[Cordelia Cruise Drugs Case] Delhi High Court Delhi based event organizer Arjun Jain who has moved court aggrieved by media reports from @IndiaToday over his alleged involvement in the case despite no summons having been issued to him by the @narcoticsbureau
Adv Nisha Bhambhani appears for respondents, begins addressing the Court.
Adv Adit S Pujari appearing for Arjun Jain, interjects.
HC: Mr. Pujari you have to learn some.. she's not arguing the case.
Court tells the parties that if anything is to be filed they may do so in the next half an hour so the court can hear the matter after lunch.
ASG Chetan Sharma: I think the Union has been impleaded just to make the petition maintainable, there are already guidelines - three layered ones - in place.
Noting that the court has to go through three compilations filed in the matter before lunch, Justice Palli: I will skip lunch if you want. I will live on air..
Matter is passed over.
HC begins hearing.
Counsel Pujari: Under the CTVN Rules, I'm called upon to first approach the channel @IndiaTV and after a lapse of 15 days I'm to approach the Respondent No.1.
HC: Mr.Pujari even if I ask them to present their affidavit, etc what is your present prayer?
Pujari: If I go by CTVN Rules, I'll have to wait almost 15+60 days before I get any relief, despite the fact that several High Courts have said several times how reporting to be done.
Pujari: @IndiaToday published my photo, very clearly, and then there was a lady standing outside my building, asking questions.
Pujari refers to published picture attached in compilation.
Pujari: Before that, without any notice from NCB, they name me in an article.. "The Men of Good Times" article and refer to a previous record. If I try to bring up previous records in a trial court the judge will castigate me saying..
HC: Yes, yes.
Pujari reads out the article.
HC: What are they saying about you, let's understand that.
Pujari: What I'm trying to indicate is that if the police can't do it for an acquitted accused surely the media can't do it for someone even the @narcoticsbureau did not implicate.
HC: Yes Mr. Pujari, and please at this stage you're only arguing for interim.
Pujari: I'll be very concise.
HC: Where is the question of estoppel at this stage? Whether they said A, B, C - ultimately what have they done?
Pujari: What's categorical is the Bombay High Court said they are not supposed to prejudice any ongoing criminal cases.
HC: Those are only suggestions, not directions.
Pujari: What @IndiaToday has done is included my name in the case for alleged involvement - NCB doesn't say so, I don't say so but India Today says, "I say so."
[Cordelia Cruises Drugs Case] Delhi HC: If you're famous they will try to bring your name, you don't have to be so touchy about everything!
Pujari: My Lords, don't want to be famous in this way.
Court is hearing Delhi event organizer company Arjun Jain's plea against @IndiaToday
Pujari: They've taken pictures of tobacco rolling paper, this is available outside High Court also, why doesn't @IndiaToday stand outside here and take pictures?
Justice Palli: Why should I hear people like you?? If they're making unsubstantiated statements so are you.
HC: File whatever you have to file, I'll see it.
Pujari: I'm sorry My Lords, I realize I've been intemperate, I whole heartedly take my statements back.
HC: And you should be.
HC: Mr. Jain is not as important as you're trying to make him
Delhi High Court tells Delhi event organizer company's founder Arjun Jain in relation to @CordeliaCruises drugs case.
Delhi High Court tells @IndiaToday in Delhi event organizing company founder Arjun Jain's plea against India Today for publishing things against Arjun Jain in Cordelia Cruises drugs case: You can report whatever you want but don't unnecessarily sensationalize things.
Sr Adv Hrishikesh Baruah for @IndiaToday: I've only published things from public domain and what I've come to know from sources. I'm nowhere saying he's accused, simply saying his name is there on the lines somewhere - if as a media house I can't do that, then, I don't know.
@IndiaToday says about Delhi event organizing company founder Arjun Jain that Jain is trying to short-circuit the whole process provided in the CTVN Rules, to address his grievances against publications with respect to the Cordelia Cruises drugs case.
ASG Chetan Sharma for the Centre: Your Lordships is right this is not just clever drafting, this is dexterous drafting, we have only been made a party to maintain this petition!
There is a full-scale Robbers' Regime.
Delhi High Court dictates order in Cordelia Cruise Drugs case.
HC: The grievance of the petitioner is that even though he's a well known entrepreneur with best business practices - Justice Palli pauses and smiles -
Pujari: They give free water in concerts My Lords, normally people charge Rs.300 just for water.
Bench resumes dictating order.
HC: He mentions that he has been compelled to approach this court, and seeks creation of an emergency grievance redressal system, inter alia.
HC: @IndiaToday submits that Arjun Jain doesn't himself come with clean hands - it's not like you've not been arrested before. Though I find merit in that the Petitioner has tried to conceal, I am of the view that the guidelines need to be examined.
[BREAKING] Delhi High Court issues notice on, refuses interim relief to Delhi event organizer company's founder Arjun Jain's plea stating that @IndiaToday has done violative reporting against him in the @CordeliaCruises Drugs case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court is hearing a plea pointing out the poor condition of the LNJP Hospital, New Delhi stating that dead bodies are lying in the same ward for 5, 10, 20 hours and they are not releasing them.
Petitioner's counsel: There are 3 people on the same bed.
"It is high time that your hospitals gear up", Delhi High Court tells @AamAadmiParty led Delhi Govt.
HC: Who are you?
Petitioner: My Lords, I was being treated at the hospital.
HC: And are you treated?
Petitioner: Yes, my Lords.
HC: Mr. Aggarwal (for Delhi Govt) is smiling. You've been treated by LNJP, hope you're thankful for that.
#SupremeCourt to hear over the issue of sentence in a matter where Rajeev Dahiya had been held guilty of Contempt of Court in a plea for non-payment of cost of Rs. 25 Lakh in PIL filed by Suraz India Trust who was later banned from filing PILs for life.
Rajiv Daiya appearing in person submitted that Milords I have submitted another unconditional apology.
Justice Kaul- Earlier also we said that there is no necessity.
Daiya: I had no other intention.
Justice Kaul said, it's your way of raising issue then you make alligations.
Daiya- Milords, This is my true Apology.
Court said, How many times this will occur it is not pleasure of ours to convict somebody.
SupremeCourt to hear plea challenging the amended reservation(s) policy by the Government of India to provide 27% reservation for OBCs and 10% reservation for (EWS) in AIQ scheme for undergraduate and postgraduate medical/dental courses from current academic year 2021-22 onwards.
Natraj, ASG preliminary objection: All the issues are a subject matter of petitions pending before a larger bench. There is also a misjoinder of parties like States, they are not before the court since its AIQ seats
Natraj: DOPT and Social justice department are not made parties.
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing Jarnail Singh, a matter it had decided in 2018, wherein a constitution bench held that the issue relating to reservation in promotion has already been decided in Nagraj’s matter and needs no reconsideration. #Reservation #JarnailSingh
Court said, Mr Sankaranarayanan, AG Argued in the Jarnail Singh reservation on the basis of population, then what can we do, we cannot go against Jarnail Singh.
Sankaranarayanan- Milords on the basis of representation in the houses reservation of Anglo's has been done away with and the SC/ST continues.
That is why 334 provided a timeline. There has to be some sort of timeline with reference to reservation also.
After last night’s suo motu cognisance of the #Lakhimpur_Kheri incident, #SupremeCourt bench led by #CJI NV Ramana to take it up today at item 17.
Case Title: IN RE VIOLENCE IN LAKHIMPUR KHERI (UP) LEADING TO LOSS OF LIFE
We have directed the registry to list the matter as suo motu, #CJI tells two lawyers who have addressed a letter to him seeking Intervention in the #LakhimpurKheriMassacre