ICYMI -- a deal to fundamentally overhaul the global tax system is expected to be announced tomorrow. It would rewrite domestic laws & international treaties, forcing the likes of @google & @facebook to pay more, globally, where they operate.

<<Cracks knucles>> cue thread
This comes down to who gets the right to tax the world's largest companies on their global operations: these firms' home jurisidictions, or countries that are home to these companies' actual customers.

In short, it's a question of sovereignty.
Friday's deal will be viewed as global. But, it really isn't. It's come down to a fight between the US (and its tech giants) and Europe (and its push to reclaim tax revenue from these companies)
The talks have been going on for years, at the @OECD, and tbh, credit for tomorrow's likely agreement, in many ways, should go to @PSaintAmans, the main leading these talks.

Want to know more about him? Sure, we got ya covered politico.eu/article/digita…
These negotiations almost fell apart in the waning days of the Trump administration after DC suggested the whole deal should be made voluntary.

That didn't go down well in Europe where many countries had already passed their own domestic digital taxes targeting the Valley
Fast forward to April this year and Biden's White House (shephered in many ways by @ItaiGrinberg) proposed a solution: let's make the whole tax overhaul solely focus on the world's 100 companies politico.eu/article/washin…
That was a gamechanger. It allowed DC to frame this as a tax overhaul that just didn't target the Valley. And it could allow Europe to claim victory, too, because the biggest tech companies would fall within the world's top 100 companies.

Job done, right?
Well, not quite. Even when the G7 (and later, G20) approved the Biden plan (I'll get to details in a minute), there was international and domestic problems. I could go into that in depth, but you know what, read this instead politico.eu/article/global…
A key question was: would Ireland, where many of the US tech giants are headquartered, overseas, because its low 12.5 corporate tax rate, come on board? Until very recently, Dublin was a no. But they've now caved, so it's all steam ahead.
The proposals fit into two buckets:

1) A global minimum tax rate of 15 percent to apply to the world's largest companies. That should, in theory, stop them from shopping for the lowest rate in a tax haven.
Ireland gets to keep its 12.5 percent rate, but will apply the 15 percent rate (via a 2.5 percentage point 'surcharge') to Big Tech giants.

I love me a good old tax fudge.
2) In an incredibly complicated tax formula, all countries where the world's top 100 companies have operations will given some of these firms' tax revenues, above a certain threshold.
That will apply to companies with at least a 10% margin (although Amazon still gets lumped in via its AWS cloud biz) and with at least $20 billion in revenue.

Again, it's the biggest of the biggest. It will generate billions in additional revenue for countries, collectively
And yet, even at this stage, it's not a done deal. We now come down to HOW to implement the thing. That won't be easy, with officials hoping to get the minimum tax rate done by 2022, and the tax-sharing done by 2023
Two main factors to look for:

1) Will the US sign up? @SecYellen has said part of deal can be done via straight Congressional majority, so they don't need Republicans' support. But the tax-sharing component will need some form of Senate approval. That could be challenging.
2) European countries will have to rescind their domestic digital taxes (DC wants that done, now). But many say they'll only do that when a final deal is in place, by 2023 at the earliest. In short, it's a big game of chicken on who will blink first politico.eu/article/a-deal…
Phew, hope that makes sense. Big HT to my Brussels colleague, @bsmithmey, who's been crushing this story before it was fashionable (if taxes can ever be fashionable.) If you don't follow him, you should. He's a great reporter.
Rant over. Thoughts appreciated.
PS: My view is that Washington and Silicon Valley "won" this fight. Why? Because DC was able to shift the burden away from solely digital giants & tech firms lobbied successfully to make that happen.

Back story on how that went down here w/ @birnbaum_e politico.eu/article/washin…
It’s official. Ireland backs @oecd deal, though claims victory in that smaller firms can keep using the 12.5 percent rate. Also: tax write-offs for multinationals👇
Amazed to see Ireland claiming victory after signing up to @oecd tax deal. It was made very clear to Dublin by Washington that if they didn’t sign up, the US would tax American companies,
domestically, to make up the difference to 15% minimum corporate tax rate if Ireland didn’t

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Scott

Mark Scott Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @markscott82

8 Oct
And so it's done. After almost a year, my three-part series on the murky world of undercover lobbying in Brussels is out. (Whoop!)

Here's my on our podcast talking about the whole operations. Enjoy politico.eu/podcast/macron…
Part One looks at EU Reporter, a Brussels-based media organization and its undisclosed ties to foreign governments and companies eagerly promoting themselves within the EU halls of power politico.eu/article/brusse…
Part Two looks specifically at how @Huawei used media organizations to lobby EU (and Belgian) officials without disclosing those associations politico.eu/article/huawei…
Read 5 tweets
5 Oct
Anyone in DC looking for suggestions on what to do about social media companies’ harm on society? Want to police algorithms and increase transparency on what everyone sees online. Here’s a quick guide to EU’s Digital Services Act proposals that do just that 👇 Image
Reminder: these rules will likely get passed in first half of 2022. They have changed since first being announced in December, 2020, but hit on everything @FrancesHaugen touched on today in terms of algorithmic and data accountability
And unlike similar content moderation proposals put of Canada, UK or Germany, they balance free speech and online protection that, imo, is a pretty good balance
Read 7 tweets
29 Sep
US & EU senior officials meet today in Pittsburgh to talk tech & trade. It's part of efforts to rebuild the transatlantic relation after Trump's 4 years.

Here's a thread on what you need to know about today's meeting and what it means for US-US relations.

<<cracks knuckles>>
First, the basics. The EU-US Trade and Tech Council was an idea dreamed up by @EU_Commission president Ursula von der Leyen to pigeonhole US thinking about digital policymaking and trade. The goal: to get DC to follow Brussels' lead
That, obviously, did not happen. The US quickly pivoted the conversation to "let's use this against China!," including efforts to stop Beijing from buying up EU & US companies and creating a Western alliance to set the next generation of tech/trade standards
Read 23 tweets
26 Aug
After talking to folk today, two things have become very clear: UK govt is willing to walk away from its adequacy deal w/ EU; almost no one with power in London understands how privacy regulations work
There is a feeling within part of UK govt that GDPR has been a hindrance to growth (it has not); and that business wants more freedom to “innovate” (most do, but not at expense of privacy rights)
But what is missing is context. The UK’s data protection regimes is decades old, is based on existing (EU-based) global norms and, for the most part, has worked.
Read 11 tweets
26 Aug
Current scenes in Brussels after London announces it wants to reach a international data deal w/ the US (and Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Kenya, South Korea, India & Singapore)
Fun fact: while the UK is pursuing these post-Brexit deals (as is its right), if such agreements leads to EU data being transferred to third-party countries that don't have adequacy deals w/ EU, then the UK's own deal w/ the EU could be in jeopardy
Worth remembering that the EU has tried to get a data deal done w/ Australia for years, but Canberra has been unwilling to meet Brussels' demands (as is its right). Also: EU's future data deal w/ US still very much up in the air.
Read 9 tweets
19 Aug
Two things are pretty clear. 1) Taliban continue is all over social media. 2) Western far-right groups have embraced the militants' message as their own.

Read all about how that's shaking out in this week's Digital Bridge newsletter 👉 politico.eu/newsletter/dig…
.@Facebook's publication of a new (US-focused) transparency report has again got people talking about how to hold these companies to account.

FWIW, both EU & US officials are (finally) putting pen to paper 👇
.@Apple really screwed the pooch on announcing plans to scan ppl's images for sexually explicit material. But as US & EU officials gather in Washington next week to discuss encryption, the iPhone maker's attempts at finding a middle group btwn privacy & security are worth a look
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(