One of the main reasons we held this important #MaskPanel discussion on Masks, COVID, Kids & Schools is because many experts have not been allowed to share their opinions and POV, w basic science and immunology being censored as "disinformation". @TracyBethHoeg address this here:
Folks, when even @IrwinRedlenerMD thinks the @CDC guidance has been “horrendous”, we got problems. And, by his own admission, he talks to the leadership frequently… #MaskPanel
Slightly OT for the #MaskPanel discussion, but important: @IrwinRedlenerMD calls out “anti-vaxxers” and @PatriceHarrisMD pushes back on that epithet, pointing out that things are not that simple when talking to and *listening to* real people in her community:
One of the hidden highlights of this important #MaskPanel discussion was the fact that neither @PatriceHarrisMD@IrwinRedlenerMD or @rweingarten seemed to know that many public schools are still forcing kids to wear masks OUTSIDE. This should be an easy win for us all *ASAP:
Here we have @PatriceHarrisMD talking about the fact that she doesn’t think we’ll ever return to “normal”, and in fact she thinks this is a *good thing*. She says that she will continue to wear masks “for the flu” : #MaskPanel
Then we have @DrJBhattacharya responding to @PatriceHarrisMD by pointing out that masks shouldn’t be used for flu because of the 14 randomized studies prior to 2020 which showed no efficacy for masks vs influenza, even in controlled healthcare settings: #MaskPanel
This is the PART 1 of soundbite that was most mentioned in our comments: @IrwinRedlenerMD decries the “politization” of the COVID & Masks, Kids & Schools discussion: #MaskPanel
Here @DrJBhattacharya points out something very important: we do not have unlimited energy and resources as a society, and focusing on low-yield, polarizing “solutions” is wasteful, counterproductive and corrosive: #MaskPanel
Thanks to @TracyBethHoeg for encapsulating the frustration parents across the country feel re this entire issue: we have been maligned, censored, talked-down-to, and even attacked for our rational POV: #MaskPanel
Next, @DrJBhattacharya addresses the issue of the loss of trust in our public institutions due to their ongoing bungling of this issue, flip flops, hypocrisy, stubborn refusal to follow science and data, and the unhelpful treatment of people who are rightly skeptical: #MaskPanel
And here we have @rweingarten asking a great #MaskPanel question about how to revive public trust in science, and our public health institutions. @TracyBethHoeg points out that the answer may seem radical, but is in fact very simple #transparency
Finally, it’s worth noting that this #MaskPanel was very well-received. The only pushback was from a few randos *demanding* that @rweingarten and @AFTunion shut down the discussion and stop the panel immediately. I honestly can’t imagine ever being someone who does this 👇
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's alarming to see Jake Tapper lose his composure like this. He's professional for about the first 2 minutes, but then completely disintegrates into a frothing, lashing mess. JD Vance knows his stuff, and comes across as extremely normal and reasonable here.
Why is Jake Tapper arguing like this? What does misrepresenting the fact accomplish? Is he a Harris surrogate? Does he think that Vance is just gonna sit back and let this stuff slide? Did he not do his homework?
Tapper defends the Russia Hoax. Full throated. Wow.
Jake Tapper acts like he's personally offended. Why?
The justices are *not* informed. They clearly had not read the evidence/case. Their questions in MISSOURI were naive, and assumed the gov did this to "protect".
Our goddamn country is at stake. You must do better in oral arguments! 😡
The back-and-forth in the MISSOURI oral was shocking. SCOTUS was clearly unfamiliar with the *core* issues, the history, the details. Yet… the lawyers assumed they were up to speed, and hadn't war-gamed a scenario where they weren't. An extremely foreseeable scenario.
All you have to do is remember when Sotomayor claimed there were "hundreds of thousands of kids in the ICU with 'covid'!" and went unchallenged.
LAWYERS: YOU CANNOT ALLOW THAT TO HAPPEN.
You must be prepared to correct the factual record!
"Legal Chaos"… yep. Once Chevron is struck down the entire Federal Administrative State will be left with a mere fraction of their current scope. It was never Constitutional for the Legislative Branch to OUTSOURCE their job to bureaucrats. Good riddance to bad governance.
The Federal government was never supposed to do as much as they currently do. The size and scope is unconstitutional. Period.
The 2 worst SCOTUS decisions were Chevron and Wickard. As long as these abominations persist, our lives will continue to get worse.
The left's arguments against overturning Chevron are "lt will be messy, thousands of bureaucrats will be fired, who will 'interpret' congress' dictates!?"
A classic case of burying the lede: it's simply illegal for the Executive branch to do 80% of what they currently do. Sry.
The other day I had a very illuminating interaction with some woke boomer protesters at an event I was attending w/ my kid, and here's how it went down:
🧵1/6
The attendees were quite diverse in terms of age, race and (assumed) income %-wise it was in-line w/ our population.
There were 8 protesters out front, they were all in their 60’s, white, & carrying hand-made signs that read:
“REPUBLICANS BAN BOOKS!”
2/6
As we were alking by I smiled, so they came up to us:
In Spring 2020, during peak COVID tyranny and public health overreach, there was one bright spot for liberty, freedom and sanity. That bright spot was the Wisconsin Supreme Court:
In Spring 2020 power mad bureaucrats across country ignored our Constitution & violating our basic human rights by issuing “public health” orders that were prima facie 100% illegal. And they did this by claiming… “emergency!”
Once our tyrannical administrative overlords began abusing their COVID “emergency” powers a lot of us started asking “WHERE ARE OUR COURTS?!” Unfortunately our courts were MIA (or worse), with one notable exception: the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
This is Twitter, not Reddit with one global sub. The POINT of this platform is short, constrained statements. Not long winded wordy bullshit.
It's such a shame that @elonmusk doesn't understand the core DNA of this platform.
@elonmusk Perhaps the greatest misconception in creativity is that "no rules" is the best brief.
Some of the greatest works in history have come from media constraints: the 3.5 minute hit song, the 100 minute feature film, the 30 second commercial.
Twitter started out w 160 characters, then grew to 220 (which was a good call).
The tweet limit is not only a little challenge, it's pleasant to the eye for the reader. It's inviting.
220 character tweets allow us to experience MORE thoughts & opinions.