It's not just policymaking by other means; it is using administrative burdens to both deny a clearly expressed democratic preference while also restricting the right of people to vote.
It is anti-democratic in both process and effect.
It so not just the compliance costs of petitioning for restitution and paying to do so. It is the learning costs of navigating a labyrinthine process to do so.
This is a description of Catch-22's, where the government has designed a system that makes it impossible for citizens to reclaim the rights of citizenship.
The outcome of this system is predictable: it is not just to remove the formal rights of citizenship, but to alienate people from any sense that they are citizens in a community with a functional social contract. nytimes.com/2021/10/07/opi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Don Moynihan

Don Moynihan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @donmoyn

8 Oct
So I did a tweet that some people liked, and some people didn't and I ended up being featured on Fox and the College Fix.

And then I got a bunch of angry, profane and harassing emails. Which is part of the point of this media ecosystem.
foxnews.com/media/georgeto…
As I wrote here, the central purpose of the "campus craziness" ecosystem is to discredit faith in higher education. Donors like the Kochs or DeVos that fund outlets like College Fix and Campus Reform view higher ed as at odds with their interests. heterodoxacademy.org/blog/academic-…
There is a predictable pattern where coverage by the "campus craziness" media ecosystem generates harassment. But faculty of color face a more intense version of this, and untenured faculty are more vulnerable to losing their job. theintercept.com/2021/04/10/cam… Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
Same energy
The underlying ethos here is Jacksonian populism: the idea that public work requires no special expertise or discretion, and must be subject to close political control.
This is the ethos that ushered in the spoils system, mass corruption and incompetence. college.cengage.com/history/ayers_…
The problem with the Jacksonian view is that public work is actually hard (simple tasks get privatized).

Teaching is complex, and to be done well requires professional expertise. For expertise to improve performance you have to give teachers discretion to use it.
Read 7 tweets
5 Oct
US Chamber of Commerce:
Sat - We are the biggest boosters of the infrastructure bill. Should have been passed 6 years ago.
Tues - We oppose the infrastructure bill.
The fact that the Chamber of Commerce will abandon its publicly announced position in order to stay aligned with Republicans says much about its supposedly nonpartisan status
There isn't much of a difference between the Chamber of Commerce and the GOP. Look at its executive leadership: stacked with people with deep Republican connections without a countervailing Dem influence.
uschamber.com/about/executiv…
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
The CRT moral panic is built on a mixture of deliberately obtuse language (in other words, bullshit) and misleading branding.

New post from me, consider subscribing:
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/bullshit-bra…
One irony I didn't have room to include is that the anti-CRT advocates connect CRT theorists to diversity training as a big gotcha. But actual CRT theorists are themselves either doubtful of such trainings (Crenshaw) or certainly didn't model them in their own teaching (Bell).
Bullshit performs different tasks:
*conveys sophistication, a reassurance that “this is a smart man, an intellectual"
*establishes conspiratorial beliefs
*provides coded language that signals in-group membership.
*denies any simpler alternative explanations
*enables branding
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
Absolutely called this one
Upgrade
What is amazing about this diatribe is that the President of Claremont makes no effort to disagree that Eastman plotted to overturn the election. Or to distance Claremont from it.
Instead he argues that political scientists have no right to weigh in on the Eastman memo!
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
She doesn't play by Washington's rules! (Apart from centering her political identity on keeping an archaic Senate rule)
She has spreadsheets! (But won't define her policy positions in a way that facilitates negotiation).
The substantive reporting in this bit sort of underlines a) the incoherence of her position - limit tax increases but wants lots of expensive stuff b) what she actually disagrees with
"Secret spreadsheets" - Drink!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(