I just noticed for the first time that in the beginning of Parshat Noach, the word translated as "corrupt" in the description of the world, and the word translated as "destroy" when God tells Noach what God is going to do about it are literally the same word.
In Ber. 6:12 the JPS translation reads:
"When God saw how corrupt the earth was, for all flesh had corrupted its ways on Earth"
Both instances of "corrupt" there, the adjective and the verb, are conjugations of
שחת
In Ber. 6:13, immediately following, God tells Noach "I am about to destroy them with the Earth". The word "destroy" is a conjugation of the exact same word:
שחת
The Flood is almost always cited as a primary example of the "OT God is mean" line of rhetoric. God, in the plain reading of the English translation, decides that *everything*, the whole Earth, gets destroyed because of some bad actors.
But reading it through this time, it seems to me like the plain reading of the Hebrew says that the whole Earth is *already* destroyed. Verses 11 and 12 tell us *why* it's already corrupt/destroyed - because "all flesh" has turned it's ways to corruption/destruction.
The repetition of 'shachat' in the preceding two verses makes God's stated action seem less like a decision and more like an inevitability. A natural consequence of the extent to which destruction has already been enacted.
There's a lot of commentary on Ber. 6:13 about why the end is written as 'eth-h'eretz'. The general consensus is that it should be read as "along with the Earth". Which makes total sense, since the exact same verb is applied to the Earth in the two preceding verses.
Translating it the same throughout:
"God saw how the Earth was destroyed, for all flesh had made destructive its ways on Earth. God said to Noach... I will destroy them along with the Earth". Read that way, it's God disallowing destroyers from escaping their own actions.
The repetition of the same word makes it seem to me more like poetic justice (contrasting with 'injustice', which is another meaning of the word that describes what the world is filled with) rather than the action of a vindictive God.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radical Traditional Jewish Person

Radical Traditional Jewish Person Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JustSayXtian

6 Oct
As someone who is raising kids in this context, I can confirm that counteracting white-Christian hegemony is no small feat. And one of the things that makes it hard is that progressive Christians and Christian atheists sometimes confuse "strong connection" with "indoctrination"
And I do get the fear around indoctrination, especially from people who themselves grew up in authoritarian religious systems and are dealing with the trauma of that. It's a real thing, with real consequences, and it's not bad to watch out for it.
But a lot of the time, when you are raising kids in a non-Christian tradition in a hegemonic Christian culture, you have to be pretty clear and direct about saying 'this is OUR culture, these are OUR traditions, these are OUR beliefs. They are not co-equal options or curiosities'
Read 17 tweets
5 Oct
Cool cool cool. Let's talk about why doing word counts is silly.

First off, I'm gonna guess that the count of 39 incidences in Exodus was arrived at by running a query on a website that provides the text in multiple translations. There's only 16 independent instances I find.
Of course, I am also looking for the English word "smite" - so it could, second of all, be a matter of some translations using different synonyms for one word, or translating multiple words all as "smite". The text isn't actually in English.
Putting that aside, though, of the 16 independent instances of "smite" I find in Exodus:

5 are about what the consequences are when humans smite each other
4 are about smiting inanimate objects
The other 7 are all about one event in Egypt, not multiple events.
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
There's this thing that happens whenever we discuss generally applicable things about Jewishness where the halacha-heads show up with edge cases and technicalities, and it's an example of what I think is a deep misunderstanding of what halacha is and what it's for.
As @N_S_Dolkart puts it here - halacha means the way of walking. The idea that it's a static, monolithic thing that can be referenced as an Eternal Truth is counter to the whole way (I think) it was meant to be used in the first place.
Throughout the Talmud, rabbis do exactly what we do on Twitter today. Someone says "Here's the rule" and someone else says "Okay, but what about X example that clearly contradicts your rule" and the answer is "Well that's different."
Read 23 tweets
26 Sep
A thing that I bring up often on here is that Judaism is an ethnoreligion - one indivisible thing, not two separate things, which means every Jew is ethnically Jewish and no non-Jews are ethnically Jewish. But does that also mean all Jews are religiously Jewish?
Yes, yes it does. Which I think can be upsetting to hear for some Jews who do not consider themselves religious, who are staunchly atheist, or who have major struggles with problematic parts of Judaism, so I would like to explain what I mean by way of a joke:
A man is walking one day, and as he passes a synagogue the rabbi steps out. "Excuse me, are you Jewish?" the rabbi asks. "Actually, yes" the man says. "Oh good," says the rabbi, "Could you come in for a minute? We need one more so my friend can say kaddish."
Read 8 tweets
20 Sep
Over the high holidays I heard a teaching that helped with a section of Torah I've always found troubling - the that God visits the guilt of the parents upon the children, upon the third and fourth generations. This repeats several times in the Torah.
It's softened a bit by what follows: "but showing kindness to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments".
But it still seems pretty harsh. What kind of God would punish children for the wrongs their parents did? And aren't we told elsewhere God *doesn't* do that?
Read 22 tweets
15 Sep
It isn't "by religion" if you're only comparing between denominations of one religion. This is egregious.
And look, this is from a public health study, not a religion study. If you're not *trying* to get a statistically significant sample of non-Christian religions then it's not surprising it problematic to not have a statistically significant sample. There aren't a lot of us.
But if that's the case it should be reflected in the visualization title and labels. Don't just pretend we don't exist.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(