We got an extension on the debt limit thanks to Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema.
They threatened to vote for a filibuster carve-out for debt issues. Within hours, McConnell agreed to suspend the debt ceiling until December. And he arranged for 11 Republican votes to do it.
1/7
All you people who insist Manchin and Sinema will never, ever, no no not ever agree to tank the filibuster--they know when to threaten to do it. And they forced Traitor McTurtle himself to ignominiously cave.
Will it work again? I don't know. But I do know this.
2/7
Even Manchin and Sinema will do what needs to be done when the time comes.
Told'ja so.
The stakes are too high for any Democrat to let failure happen. Yes, it'll be slower and more painful full of more teenage angsty drama than any of us want. But it'll happen.
3/7
By the way, this isn't the first time this happened. Back in January, McConnell was dragging his feet on approving the Senate rules for a 50-50 chamber. Then, too, the logjam was broken when Manchin and Sinema threatened to kill McConnell's filibuster.
4/7
The very day before McConnell caved on =that= issue, Senator Schumer appeared on television and assured us the rules were about to be agreed to, and that the Senate WAS GOING TO move forward. He said he a few tricks up his sleeve.
5/7
Will it work yet again? I don't know. But I do know the threats aren't idle. If McConnell again insists he won't participate in governing, Democrats will reveal the Republican Party to be irrelevant.
Meanwhile, the Jan 6 Select Committee will reveal them to be criminals.
6/7
The essence of politics is the same as that of humor, drama, love, war, and poker.
.
.
Timing.
And McConnell knows Schumer doesn't make threats he won't follow up on.
7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We watched Tommy for the first time in decades last night. It's an even better film than I remembered. The film says important things about the nature of enlightenment and the commercialization of religion--o wonder none of the critics understood it.
1/8
The performances are stunning. Except Jack Nicholson--they should have gotten someone for that part who could sing that melody. He butchered it. Tina Turner is absolutely terrifying. Elton John is delightful. The Who are brilliant, particularly Roger Daltrey and Keith Moon.
2/8
We're all agreed Eric Clapton is an asshole, but he plays an ethics-free grifter so maybe it was typecasting. Oliver Reed is absolutely odious.
And then there's Ann-Margaret. I don't have to say more. Wow.
The music holds up well too. And for fans of the original opera...
3/8
I hope y'all have learned not to listen to the punditiots and editorializing "reporters" who insist the Biden presidency has problems, or that Madam Speaker can't count votes.
Watch what happens, not who pontificates on what's about to happen.
During Obama's presidency, Rasmussen Polling created what they called a "Presidential approval index," which they calculated by taking the "strong approval" rating and subtracting the "strong disapproval" number. This was invariably a negative result. Haters gotta hate.
1/5
There are always more people who "strongly" disapprove of a president than who "strongly" approve. It is part of human nature for hate to be more of a motivator than happiness.
Hate > joy.
2/5
This method of generating an "approval" number didn't exist before President Obama. Rasmussen created it as a propaganda device to make President Obama look bad.
No one else--EVER--used this method for generating a "presidential approval index."
3/5
During the height of the last Ice Age maximum, the world was only about 2C =colder= than it was in the 1950s. A difference of 2C is the difference between half of the world covered under a mile of ice, and the climate we all grew up in.
2/7
What 2C =warmer= means is hard to understand, but it will inevitably be a difference on the same scale.
Humans have never lived in that world. Much bigger deserts, immense coastal flooding, wars over fresh water, literally billions of displaced climate refugees.
3/7
One way the most extreme cults keep members in line is by demanding they commit some horrible atrocity simply to join.
In the Mob, it's called "making your bones." You might have to kill someone, for instance. Historically, some cults have demanded crimes up to cannibalism.
1/6
These initiation rites are designed not only to prove your loyalty and to give the cult heavy blackmail to threaten you with, but also to rob you of your humanity. To later renounce the cult would mean you have to admit (even to yourself) that you did an inhuman thing.
2/6
Few people have the moral courage to admit their own such crimes were unjustifiable, and yet they did them anyway. The only alternative is to double-down and insist the acts were not crimes, but were necessary, and perhaps even served a Greater Good.
3/6