Working alongside investigative journalist Sharri Markson we uncovered that over the past decade, the U.S. has funded over 60 projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
WCW and Markson found that the National Institutes of Health, United States Agency for International Development, Department of Defense, and Department of Energy all funneled YOUR tax dollars to the Wuhan Animal Lab.
Thanks to Senator Joni Ernst, the Senate has passed legislation to prohibit any future tax dollars from being used at the WIV but it still needs to pass the House. If it doesn’t, the “Wuhan Loophole” means that WIV will continue getting money for dangerous animal tests until 2024
According to @anthonybellotti 26 more labs in China are still being funded by the US taxpayer via The NIH.
@WhiteCoatWaste told you about some of the other horrible animal experiments happening at the Wuhan lab. But what if we told you that U.S. taxpayers had been subsidizing a lot more experimentation in the Wuhan labs, for a much longer time, than anyone has admitted?
We need to close out funding for WIV as soon as possible.
1. Academic mobbing is a non-violent, sophisticated, ‘ganging up’ behaviour adopted by academicians to “wear and tear” a colleague down emotionally through unjustified accusation, humiliation, general harassment and emotional abuse
2. These are directed at the target under a veil of lies and justifications so that they are “hidden” to others and difficult to prove. Bullies use mobbing activities to hide their own weaknesses and incompetence.
Dr. Callahan can run around the world picking clinical isolates out of disease outbreaks and prioritize things that way.
"If I were, you know, doing things, I might do what I know. I might resynthesize SARS, put a toxin on it, infect myself, and cough on people"
Dr. Callahan:
"Yes. We find avian influenza disquieting in the extreme, and the reasons are basically that most of the work is already being done for the terrorists.
Several of those countries have become more difficult to work with in recent history" (China)
A few people have recently proposed changing the R in DRASTIC from "Radical" to "Rational".
Reminder, since May 2020, DRASTIC is:
Decentralised Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating Covid-19
Please read some comments below which address this issue.
1. Changing that word in our acronym at this stage after nearly 2 years will be perceived as a sign of weakness 2. This vote is a waste of time. The acronym for drastic is in print in several books” 3. We will become a laughing stock
4. The meaning of radical is ambiguous, but as an adjective the meaning here is the Number 1 meaning
thorough, complete; change etc. nothing to do with a political point of view.
Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and "batified" mice, and much, much more.