Threatening to remove equalization from the constitution is kind of akin to the richest guy in the neighborhood threatening to cut the power cable that runs through his yard if his neighbour's don't pay up.
No one thinks he's serious. Even when he tells them he's polled members of his family who agree with him.
He's whipped those family members into a frenzy, mind you. And some of them are threatening to leave. He tells the neigbbours: "I wanna stay, and I don't really want to cut the power line, but the only way I can convince my crazy family not to move is if you give me more money."
He continues, "my family's bought more Girl Guide cookies from your kids than you'll ever buy from mine. We practically put your kids through school. We're only asking for a bit of that back, so we can fix the engine on our second Hummer."
It's a ridiculous analogy. For certain. But it's not that far off how other Canadians view Alberta's equalization referendum.
Threatening to cut off a lifeline to other neighbours, despite the ill effects it would have on one's own home, is crazy. It would get the neigbbours' attention, but not in a productive way.
Some will respond with their own ridiculous threats, bogging down the neighborhood in petty struggles over sidewalk access and daytime parking. All the while, every one of those neighbours is struggling and needs to get its own house in order.
Point is: perceptions matter. There are productive ways of coming to consensus on how to improve the neighborhood. Polling your household, and threatenkng to cut the power or leave entirely, aren't among them.
To be clear: the rich man in this analogy does have problems. And his neighbours, if not directly to blame, are in a position to help. I do think there are ways of securing a fairer deal for Alberta. They involve building stronger relationships with neighbours, not ultimatums.
Many Albertans, and most Yes voters, will be offended by the rich man analogy. I agree, it's not an accurate portrayal. But that doesn't make it any less real for folks in the rest of Canada. And voting yes in this referendum does nothing to correct the stereotype.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Kenney Government's official equalization website is up. And it's... interesting. 🧵#ableg#abpoli
On the Fact Sheet, this is how the government explains equalization. Not sure about you, but this wording and sentence structure doesn't inspire much confidence in the government's ability to engage in constitutional negotiations.
Neither does this. Either the government doesn't know that Stabilization and Equalization are completely separate programs, or they are purposefully lying to Albertans.
Someone asked me today: what went wrong with Alberta's system of government that led to this catastrophe?
My answer: all democratic institutions rely on elected leaders to identify, agree upon, and pursue the common good. #ableg (Thread/rant)
We live in a Canada's richest province. A province where a majority of MLAs believe it is both politically expedient and in the public interest to allow dozens of citizens to die daily without any meaningful action.
We also live in a province where a majority of voters - and a plurality in more than half of our constituencies - chose to elect those representatives to office. This is the Alberta government we chose. Overwhelmingly. This is our government. And we can't look away.
Some may have trouble understanding why Nathan Cooper needs to resign the Speakership and why that's important. 🧵#ableg
In a loose sense, the Speaker like the referee. A former Blue team member, Cooper is expected to stop playing the game and act as an impartial arbiter. He can go back to playing, but obviously can't do both at once. Applies to linespeople (Deputy Speakers like A. Pitt), too.
Now... Imagine if a referee wrote an open letter to the head coach of the Blue team condemning his leadership. And the linesperson joined in. This happened. cbc.ca/news/canada/ed…
Looking ahead to Alberta this fall, it's challenging to compare other countries' experiences with COVID-19. Here's why. 🧵
Being one of the few (only?) jurisdictions to abandon most testing, tracing, & isolation (TTI) protocols -- the 3 pillars of pandemic management -- Alberta is creating an entirely new environment for COVID-19.
This makes drawing lessons from TTI countries quite tenuous.
When people say "kids in Country X are at low risk for contracting COVID-19," they're probably right.
A good follow-up question: "Did Country X have test-trace-isolate protocols in place?"
If not, it's tough to compare them with Alberta this fall.