Since there seems to be a lot of confusion about how Congressional subpoenas work, let’s review it and what they can do when witnesses refuse to comply.
(THREAD)
So what is a subpoena? A subpoena is a legally enforceable demand for documents, data, or witness testimony. In Latin, "sub poena" means "under penalty."
Subpoenas are most commonly used by litigants in court cases. The Supreme Court has also recognized Congress's power to issue subpoenas, saying in order to write laws, it also needs to be able to investigate crimes.
Congress' power to issue subpoenas, while broad, is not unlimited. The high court has said Congress is not a law enforcement agency, and cannot investigate someone purely to expose wrongdoing or damaging information about them for political gain.
A subpoena must potentially further some "legitimate legislative purpose," the court has said. So assuming the subpoena is issued for a legitimate reason, what can Congress do when someone refuses to comply?
The first thing they can do is hold the offender “in contempt of Congress.” The contempt process can start in either the House or the Senate. Unlike with legislation, it only takes a majority in ONE of the chambers to make and enforce a contempt citation.
Typically, the members of the congressional committee that issued the subpoena will vote on whether to move forward with a contempt finding. If a majority supports the resolution, then another vote will be held by the entire chamber.
Democrats currently hold majorities, albeit slim ones, in both the House and Senate. The House is currently investigating January 6th with a select committee chosen by @SpeakerPelosi because Republicans in the senate rejected forming a bipartisan committee in that chamber.
Trump and the @GOP’s main strategy for avoiding accountability is to run out the clock. They tried this strategy from 2018-2020 to prolong investigations until the next Congress was seated, hoping they could dissolve the investigations or argue contempt citations have expired.
How is a contempt finding enforced? There are a number of ways. The first is arresting or detaining witnesses. The Supreme Court said in an 1821 case that Congress has the “inherent authority” to arrest and detain witnesses that don’t cooperate.
In a 1927 case, the high court said the Senate acted lawfully in sending its deputy sergeant-at-arms to Ohio to arrest and detain the brother of the then-AG, who had refused to testify about a bribery scheme known as the Teapot Dome scandal.
However, it has been almost a century since Congress exercised this arrest-and-detain authority, and most legal experts believe the practice is unlikely to make a comeback (no matter how warranted it is). So what else can they do?
Congress can ask the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia (a federal prosecutor) to bring criminal charges against a witness who refuses to appear. There is a criminal law that specifically prohibits flouting a congressional subpoena.
Worth noting this option was not viable for getting witnesses affiliated with Trump to testify while he was in office because it relies on the executive branch to be enforced. Now that Biden is President, and has said he will not invoke executive privilege, it is viable again.
The last option Congress has to enforce a contempt finding is getting its lawyers to bring a civil lawsuit & requesting a judge rule that compliance is required. Failure to comply with such an order can trigger a “contempt of court” finding, bringing daily fines and imprisonment.
Congressman @tedlieu has introduced a bill that would allow Congress to impose fines of up to $100,000 on witnesses that are found in contempt of Congress, which would greatly strengthen their power to hold witnesses accountable. They should pass this ASAP.
Yesterday, both House chairs of the January 6th select committee said they would enforce subpoenas and are considering criminal referals to hold Bannon in contempt. We need to keep pressure on them to use all their powers to #EnforcetheSubpoenas.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Wortman 🏳️‍🌈

Andrew Wortman 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AmoneyResists

10 Oct
I’m not a fan of Bill Maher, but I can recognize a prescient prediction: & this is not only terrifyingly plausible, it’s the path we are currently on & will remain on if we don’t get voting rights legislation passed or hold Trump accountable for his crimes
I want to clarify a few things. First, if your takeaway from this is that all hope for America is lost, then you’ve missed the point. These predictions are not set in stone. We have the power to change them right now. So stay involved & engaged in the fight for democracy.
Second, I do not believe Trump will be the nominee in 2024. While I know most people have lost faith in the notion that Trump will actually face some consequences for his crimes, I have not. He still faces thousands of criminal charges and he will be brought down by one of them. Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Sep
The entire ‘abortion debate’ is not about life. No one is “pro-abortion” & most people who call themselves “pro-life” are fine with mass shootings, the death penalty, & lack of mandates for masks/vaccines even after 650K COVID deaths. It’s about women’s rights to bodily autonomy.
I’m sick of this debate being falsely framed as “pro-life” vs “pro-choice.” It’s pro-women’s fundamental rights vs. anti-women’s fundamental rights. When a zygote technically qualifies as a person isn’t relevant; we don’t force people to donate blood or organs to save others.
Why should we have more of a right to make decisions over our own blood, organs, & bone marrow than women do over their uterus after WE impregnate them? Abortion bans don’t even stop abortions; they just increase the likelihood that the women DIE during labor. That’s not pro-life
Read 4 tweets
5 Sep
Justice Sotomayor’s dissent on Texas’ monstrous new abortion ban that flouts all judicial precedent and is flagrantly unconstitutional is
🔥 🔥 🔥 and places her on the record as denouncing this malicious and grotesque injustice in a way that solidifies her advocacy for women.
“The Court’s order is stunning. Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights & evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand.”
“Last night, the Court silently acquiesced in a State’s enactment of a law that flouts nearly 50 years of federal precedents. Today, the Court belatedly explains that it declined to grant relief because of procedural complexities of the State’s own invention.”
Read 23 tweets
1 Sep
What we’ve been watching unfold with the @GOP-crime syndicate operating in broad daylight while media outlets pretend we still have two normally functioning political parties IS A FIVE ALARM FIRE for America and represents the biggest threat this nation has ever faced.
🚨 I am not being hyperbolic. We’ve been sounding this alarm FOR YEARS with seemingly NO ONE in any position of authority taking it seriously. EVERY MINUTE that passes without any shred of accountability for this party of criminals, terrorists, & traitors further endangers us all
I understand Biden entered the WH with a MULTITUDE of overlapping crises to address. And I understand his impulse to prioritize vaccines and COVID relief above all else. But we are seeing now the futility of this because the @GOP literally WANTS COVID cases to continue to spike.
Read 15 tweets
31 Aug
The magnitude of delirium/malignant narcissism required to:

—Take credit for an economy you inherited, but blame your total collapse of on your successor

—Take credit for “ending the war in Afghanistan,” but blame the fallout from the terms you negotiated on your successor
—Take credit for a vaccine you had nothing to do with but “no responsibility at all” for the hundreds of thousands who died because of your pandemic response

—Take credit for “building a wall” that was never built while blaming a non-existent “border crisis” on your successor
—Take credit for “eradicating ISIS” yet blame your successor when they attack and kill our troops in Kabul

—Take credit for lack of early case #’s (due to lack of testing) by “taking early action in restricting travel to/from China,” then blaming China when case numbers exploded
Read 10 tweets
30 Aug
To people claiming we “only oppose _______ because we hate Trump”

1. Our hatred of Trump is not something we are ashamed of. He EARNED it by being a loathsome racist traitor who told over 30K lies; CAGED INFANTS; TRAUMATIZED AMERICA; & KILLED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of us.
2. But this does NOT determine if we oppose/support things. We have this ability to actually separate our justified contempt for the psychopathic criminal that used to occupy the WH and still come to rational objective conclusions like taking sheep dewormer for COVID is moronic.
3. This was Trump’s ultimate gaslight (lie); which was that if you disagreed with him on something, it was because you must “hate him” or be biased in some way. His supporters (literal cultists) even coined the term “Trump Derangement Syndrome” to dismiss our concerns as biased.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(