Funny thing is that I both agree some people are really good at certain things
AND I also believe that certain environments are conducive to elevating everyone such that one person being really good at something doesn’t mean much (though it is helpful)
1/n
AND I also believe that certain environments are conducive to elevating everyone such that one person being really good at something doesn’t mean much (though it is helpful)
1/n
https://twitter.com/kocienda/status/1446847062717255680
The difference boils down to predominantly team oriented views of our work vs individual oriented views.
If you got all the best ppl at doing X in the world together and put them in a room… the differences would be minimal
In their org they are…. 2/n
If you got all the best ppl at doing X in the world together and put them in a room… the differences would be minimal
In their org they are…. 2/n
Much better than everyone at X. They might even be 10x at it. If you leave them alone to do X they will outperform everyone at X.
But in a team setting, you’ll also need to do Y and Z. And A, B, and C.
Being 10x at X doesn’t mean much. 3/n
But in a team setting, you’ll also need to do Y and Z. And A, B, and C.
Being 10x at X doesn’t mean much. 3/n
The core of this ongoing debate is actually a clash between perspectives:
between 1) the individual can he a lot better at X and that matters VS 2) that may be true but it doesn’t really matter (and holding the idea over people might actually hurt)
4/end
between 1) the individual can he a lot better at X and that matters VS 2) that may be true but it doesn’t really matter (and holding the idea over people might actually hurt)
4/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
