Thoughts on the joint statement issued by Royal College, BMA, etc..

Defending healthcare from new government demands

Please RT, change will only occur if the public support it..

bit.ly/3aneDrU
A number of national bodies have written a joint statement highlighting the pressures on the health service and staff.

The public are upset they have reduced access to care.

The government wants more face to face consults and for waiting lists to fall…
But these demands are made when:

1. Our bed capacity remains lower than it has ever been. Despite WHO advice to increase basic care capacity to manage the additional patients, this Leadership reduced it by 8%. Less beds = less frontline staff.
2. The government have embarked on a herd immunity strategy, leading to 500-1000 admissions per day!

At the current rate of covid, this has TRIPLED the healthcare burden of pneumonia - already one of the highest burden diseases. And taken up around 6% of all beds.
3. We have still been unable to provide the level of care to Covid patients they need, even at the level recommended for low-income countries.

thelancet.com/journals/lanep…
4. There are even less GPs than last year, due to unmanageable working conditions. And many HCWs are leaving the profession.
So in short, the gov have released a high burden pathogen into the community, shrunken the capacity of the NHS, and are now asking us to provide more consults and reduce waiting lists. It is a delusional rhetoric, in my view, designed to apportion blame to the “lazy” NHS when …
the reality is that the lack of access to healthcare the public are suffering is a direct result of this leaderships decisions or lack of an actual plan #CovidInquiryNow

What we need now is…
1. Clinical Prioritisation

Trying to deliver the same level of care with more patients and less capacity will only lead to worse outcomes for all involved, and more people leaving the profession.
The colleges (@RCPhysicians @rcgp, @RCEMPolicyVP, @rcpsych) need to issue guidelines about clinical priorities within the context of this government’s healthcare rationing policies. We need to keep patients safe and staff functioning.
2. Any resources made available must first go directly to increasing frontline staffing. Acute, urgent, and primary care must be first priority (includes psychiatry).

We have to accept, we are not working in a world-class health system. Focus limited resource on high risk areas
3. We need an urgent public inquiry to understand what provision the state is making for protecting the health of the UK public.
Finally, to my colleagues, our duty is not to government or policy or even our managers,…our duty is to the patient. We must prioritise our workloads. It is unsafe to work 80 hours per week. And yes, the public will be unhappy…but they have the address of the man in charge.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Dan Goyal

Dr Dan Goyal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danielgoyal

9 Oct
Thread on FLU versus COVID

Apologies for lots of previous single tweets on this. Thread…

It seems many people believe Flu and COVID are in some way similar.

Many use this as an argument for easing Covid mitigation strategies.

Simply and utterly, completely wrong ..

1/n
To clear the first point up:

In the UK,

Flu deaths are 1200 per year.

At our current rate, COVID-19 kills over 40,000 per year. [this is even with vaccine coverage of >60%] Image
COVID-19 is currently killing more than 30 times more people than FLU.

FACT! Anyone says otherwise, ask for the evidence.
Read 8 tweets
9 Oct
What would a modern, properly funded NHS look like?

The NHS has been severely restricted by government funding. This has led to rationing of care at levels never seen in the NHS.

But what would the NHS look like were it allowed to grow with demands…
1/n
#NHS

Add ur own…
ACCESSIBILITY

A modern health service is accessible in a timely fashion to all patients.

A variety of mediums are available…email your pharmacist, physio, specialist nurse with a query; consult via phone, video, or face to face; interactive messaging;
TIMELY

Time to doctor contact is defined by illness not staff availability.

Expert advice available without delay.

Delay in diagnosis (eg cancer) relates only to the biological delays in processing investigations.

Treatment commences at the point of diagnosis.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
#COVID19 UK thread:

Why has the UK mortality been so high?

Overall mortality of the pandemic can be measured as total deaths.

Deaths per 100k inhabitants:

UK - 205
Sweden - 144
Germany - 113
Ireland - 103
Norway - 16
Japan - 14
Singapore - 2 (yes, two)

1/n
So why has the UK had more deaths?

Sweden pursued a herd immunity strategy. Germany had a similar public health response to the UK. Both have done much better than the UK.

if you get Covid-19 in the UK, you have a higher chance of dying. Why?
The first FATAL flaw of the UK response was the “stay home” approach.

Instead of triaging (assessing) covid cases, the UK opted to make NO routine clinical contact with ANY covid cases. UK national policy relies on the patient to come forward if severely unwell.

NO TRIAGE
Read 17 tweets
4 Oct
There are some misconceptions about private healthcare versus the NHS.

It is not a choice between reduced waiting times and better rooms.

1. A major change is motives. What is the motive of your doctor or service provider when offering tests or treatments?

1/n
2. Where patients are seen as profit-making opportunities, the treatments offered changes. Now, NHS treatments are offered based on efficacy: does the treatment actually benefit the patient? Privatisation means corporations decide whether you treatments should be offered.
Both must consider money, but the outcome of the public service is how much bang for the buck…how much extra, good quality life can we get out of this treatment. It’s all about health and the patients life.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(