“Anti-Racism” often assumes that virtually ALL social inequalities are due to structural, social injustice. If you are a criminal or poor it is not your fault.
Anti-Anti-Racism often teaches that virtually NO social inequalities are due to structural, social injustice. If you
...are a criminal or poor it is always your fault.
Because Christianity teaches both individual yet corporate responsibility, both humanity in the image of God yet deep sinfulness, the Bible doesn’t promote either simplistic view. It fully critiques both yet fulfills the best
...aspirations of each without either combining them or borrowing from them. It calls strongly for biblical justice but acknowledges the deep complexity of the causes and the solutions without being reductionistic.
BTW- Most people are on a spectrum between anti-racism and anti-anti-racism. But there are definitely people at the end of the spectrum. I've read their books and articles.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵-The thread on the ‘Third Way’ has been good. A lot of the pushback from "the Left" seems confused on idolatry.
Idolatry is false consciousness. The idol projects the illusion that it can heal & fix life in a way that only God can. It also leads us to reductionistic 1/
solutions that are too simplistic to work. Niebuhr writes: “Every form of modern secularism [that denies God] contains an implicit or explicit self-glorification and deification…” He names four kinds of idolatry in the modern world. 2/
1) Liberalism deifies human reason and science. It doesn’t realize that science can only tell us what ‘is’ but not what ‘ought’ to be. It is a necessary but also an insufficient guide to life. Moderns often fail to see that science cannot give meaning or purpose or morality. 3/
Long 🧵! Some have said that my being attacked by both the “right” and the “left” is a sign I am teaching truth because truth is found in the middle between extremes. I appreciate the support, but that’s not accurate. 1/
First, it's important to note everyone occupies SOME middle because there’s always someone to one side or the other on issues who thinks YOU have compromised. Nearly everyone is in a ‘middle’—the question is: which middle is the right one? 2/
Second, Christians should never seek a middle ground for its own sake. The goal should be to take positions that do justice to the Biblical teaching, regardless of whether the world sees you—in its categories-- as an extremist or a moderate. 3/
🧵 Dear Social Media-
God sometimes mocks (Ps 2:4) and so some things deserve it. Yet those who habitually and constantly mock, who ‘sit in the seat of mockers’ (Ps 1:1), are in great spiritual danger. Mockers nurture high pride in themselves (Prov 21:24) which appears knowing 1/
and sophisticated but ruins relationships (Prov 22:10; 29:8) and cuts them off from truth that only the humble discover (Prov 9:7-8,12; 15:12; cf. 1 Peter 5:5). To ‘see through’ everything is the same as not to see. (C.S. Lewis). 2/
Preachers and teachers who engage in a great deal of mockery toward their opponents, instead of speaking the truth in love (Eph 4:15; Gal 6:1; 2Tim 2:24-26), often nurture an abusive spirit that brings down their own ministries in disgrace. There are many on social media whose 3/
To PCA GA: WLC 139 puts “sodomy, all unnatural lusts; all unclean imaginations, thoughts...affections” in a single list all violating the 7th command. No gradations. To argue some sinful sexual desires are disqualifying for office but others are not, you can’t use the confession.
Before we put modern words like “identify” or “identity” into our Constitution we should first do a major study to be sure we are using the word to convey biblical truth. Start with terrific essays by Michael Allen buff.ly/31AAGYH; also Scott Swain buff.ly/3ybQYV1
We want to make sure we use a word that won't be considered in twenty years as opaque and obsolete.
For PCA friends at the 2021 GA. WLC 151 says these sins are more “heinous in God’s sight” than others- Paragraph 1: if the person doing the sin should know better or is a visible bad example to others. Paragraph 2: If the parties more immediately offended are—1/8
God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, leaders, the weak, and the communal common good. Paragraph 3: If the sin itself—a) breaks many express biblical commandments at once; b) is not merely a desire but is acted upon so that “reparations” cannot be made; 2/8
c) is against laws obvious not only to Christians but to general reason (“the light of nature”) and society (“civil punishments”); d) is against specific covenants and vows made to God and men; e) if done deliberately, obstinately, frequently/continuously, boastingly, and 3/8
This long tweet 🧵 is mainly for my PCA colleagues who are meeting at our denominational assembly. As we gather, I believe it is wrong to dismiss the concerns of “conservatives” in the PCA [quote marks because the whole PCA is very conservative] who want to be vigilant 1/7
in a culture that is moving into a more highly secular, and anti-religious direction. It’s right to assume that such a pervasive, anti-Christian culture may have a powerful influence on especially our younger generations. Its also right to assume that the cultural winds are 2/7
against orthodox, evangelical Christianity and that it will be very difficult to thrive and grow as a denomination going forward. As a whole body, we should be talking about this—how will we convert people and grow as a faithful communion in a culture like the one that is 3/7