There's a flip side to this in elite circles for every group (not just Hispanics): if an actual current, practicing member of the group who still keeps to all its problematic codes/norms tries to join the circle & speak, they're rejected in favor of the LARPer.
There is an elite neuroticism around "authenticity" that has to be seen to be believed. You're supposed to perform your elite socialization while simultaneously signaling your ethnic bona fides in approved ways, in order to be an "authentic" voice for your group of origin...
...because if you just keep on being "one of THOSE people," then you get a bunch of hostility (especially from the LARPers whose franchise you threaten) like, "Oh, look who thinks they're MORE authentic. Look at this person trying be more ethnic-than-thou. What a phony!"
I realize this sounds insane if you haven't experienced it, but it's how it works. If you're in elite circles & you just stay doing your thing like the folks back home, then at some point you're seen as someone who's doing an act, while the LARPer is put forward as authentic.
The more the media obsesses over the politics of a group, the worse this weird dynamic is. Right now, there's once again a big elite media freak-out over "who will the Latinx bodied persons vote for?" This creates a market for "authentic" voices that can be held up as oracles.
Prior to that, it was "the WWC," & it was in that context that I experienced this. The fact that I have an Ivy grad school education & participate in some elite culture, but obstinately live in TX, drive a truck to a Pentecostal church, shoot guns, etc. makes me a LARPer to them.
I'm a guy who is (to them) trying a bit too hard to be an authentic WWC person. I've had these insane exchanges w/ media types where they're like, "look at you with your guns & your Jesus LARPing. You think. you're just SOOOO authentic. Why should anyone listen to you, faker?"
I'm always at a loss when I get this, because I'm not trying to be "authentic." The obsession with authenticity to one's community of origin is part of what makes neurotic elites who they are, & they project it on anyone who shows up in the room with them. It's all projection.
What it comes down to: If you're in a room where it's understood that everyone is doing a bit, then you're also doing a bit whether you like it not -- your bit is just "the one guy who wants everyone to think he's not doing a bit."

To stop doing a bit, you gotta exit the room.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jonstokes.com

jonstokes.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonst0kes

12 Oct
This is wild. Everyone buys this product for the exact same off-label usage, it seems. Can anyone guess what it's for based on the mods the algo has suggested? Image
If you're going to run one of these in rain or snow, you've got to take measures. Standard practice based on Googling is to mod out one of the Suncast outdoor storage sheds for ventilation and exhaust.
Read 4 tweets
12 Oct
TIL the current highest-grossing movie in China, which is also the biggest movie in the world by receipts & China's most expensive movie to date, is a CCP-backed patriotic war movie depicting a Chinese victory over American forces in the Korean war. military.com/off-duty/movie…
At ~29:40 in this interview with @MarkLGoldberg, the Director of the Center for China-US Cooperation at Joseph Korbell School of international studies university of Denver places this movie in the context of Taiwan invasion war drums & is alarmed. undispatch.com/how-china-make…
Suiseng Zhao on China's military right now: "They think they can win. They REALLY think they can win. If & when the supreme leader issues the order, they're ready to carry it out. I don't know if they're really ready, but they think they are. They can win the battle...
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
I cannot believe this article. I am gobsmacked. Grandmaster Jay is an open, raging anti-semite who believes all kinds of insane stuff about Jews, yet not only is this information nowhere in the article, but they frame the NFAC like this:
A lot of dude's anti-semitic material has been taking down, but this is not hard to find, and anyone who has followed the NFAC for even 5 mins knows this.
This piece by @gcaw gets into a bit of that material, & in general is far better guide to this deeply insane, violent character than @teamtrace's irresponsible woke-washing of him. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
Read 12 tweets
10 Oct
Today I tested the new Costco generator I picked up a few weeks ago by running it for 30 mins, on the theory of “test it before you need it.” If you have a generator, now is the time to get fuel for it and make sure it’s good to go.
For the curious, I picked up this Firman because it’s tri-fuel, has a manual start option (in case the battery’s dead), has a 50A RV plug, & most importantly was in stock when I was in the market. costco.com/firman-7500w-r…
I also have a nice Honda one. The Honda generators are the best from a reliability & reputation standpoint, but you pay through the nose.
Read 4 tweets
8 Oct
A quick thread on prepping for a doomsday scenario, like a war with China. The key to all of it is this: behave in the present in ways that will give you options in the future.

Finance people know: as volatility approaches infinity, so does the value of optionality.
Physical fitness? Should you find yourself in a fight-or-flight situation, or even just doing a lot of manual labor, that’s optionality.

Food? The more you have, the more optionality in terms of “stay in place or bug out.”

Weapons/ammo/goods? Options for use or barter.
Offline social network? Other people are the ultimate in optionality.

And of course, liquidity is optionality. But if you don’t know what will be liquid in the future, then diversify in the present (again, on the principle of options > *).
Read 9 tweets
7 Oct
Me, a member of society: I have thoughts on this issue!

You: This is all just a game for you isn't it! Others actually have a real stake in this issue, my dude.

Me: Ah, my bad. I thought you were demanding something of me in some way. Glad that's not the case!
But seriously, how is it that anyone thinks telling people, "this is all just an abstraction or word games for you, & you have no real stake in it" is a proper thing to pair w/ a big ole plate of asks, like resources or behavior changes or completely reorganizing society?
At the heart of deliberative rhetoric is the appeal to mutual interest. Prefacing a list of demands with, "there is no mutual interest here, so STFU" is not the behavior of people who feel they're at a disadvantage & need buy-in from all the stakeholders.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(