Meanwhile, those envisioning a tech-powered automotive nirvana are distracted from mundane (but proven) ways to improve mobility networks.
Examples: Expanding transit service, installing bike lanes, and building densely around transportation nodes. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Autonorama draws from Norton's first book, Fighting Traffic, which explains how motordom reshaped urban policy in the 1920s to maximize car speed (i.e., inventing the “crime” of jaywalking).
Those decisions were disastrous for cities. Will we make similar mistakes with AVs?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Public officials could powerfully improve urban lives by emphasizing **access** (easily reachable destinations) instead of **speed** (fast roads + rail).
A 🧵 about this new-ish book (2019), which explains why -- and how.
Economist Anthony Downs gets credit for the idea of induced demand, but its roots go back *much* further than his 1962 article.
In 1927, engineer Arthur S. Tuttle warned that new urban roads “would be filled immediately by traffic which is now repressed because of congestion.”
In the 1920s and 1930s city officials worried about wooing suburbanites to shop and work, so they shrunk their sidewalks and ripped up public space to accommodate more cars.
Why worry about infotainment systems? They’re harmless and fun, right?
Well, not necessarily. A study by the AAA Foundation found that rerouting a destination can distract a driver for up to 40 seconds—enough time to cover half a mile at 50 mph. newsroom.aaa.com/2017/10/new-ve…
Even if a driver uses voice commands, systems often require looking at a car's touchscreen (and not the road) to verify accuracy. That’s inherently risky.
A provocative question in this book by @STS_News: Why doesn't the USA regulate car safety like emissions?
"How would automakers transform their products if we mandated that they reduce the number of automotive fatalities in new cars by, say, 40% within 10 years?"
A thread 🧵:
For a century, automobile safety has largely focused on 1) driver education and 2) voluntary agreements by automakers to build safer cars.
Both those approaches are flawed.
Here's future Sen. Daniel P. Moynihan critiquing safety education in 1959:
It "shifts public attention from factors like auto design, which we can reasonably hope to control, to factors such as the temperament and behavior of 80M drivers, who [will ignore] a bunch of slogans."
Just finished @shigashide's book about how to improve bus service—it’s good!
Loads of useful info about operations as well as advocacy. And a surprisingly easy read.
Short 🧵:
2/ Here's an excellent rebuttal to those (like Gov Cuomo) who claim fancy stuff like USB ports and wifi will attract loads of new riders:
3/ @humantransit is a clear influence, so I wasn't surprised to find this stinging critique of microtransit:
“When existing bus routes are unreliable and slow, focusing attention on microtransit is like trying to perfect dessert at a restaurant that routinely burns the entrees.”