nagarjuna articulating the doctrine of interdependent origination in second century northern india (colorized):
if you want to sound really cool this is called sunyata by the way, but the S is a SH sound like in upanisads. basically its the idea that things are inherently empty of self nature in the specific sense that they arise as a result of other things that are external to themselves
while it is true, and i cant say what its like studying this in a proper cohesive context, ie within a lineage of esoteric buddhism, for me the missing piece is slightly platonic - in that, yes, a whale arises as a result of many other factories external to the whale. thats true
so the whale is inseparable from a net of other causes that are paradoxically external to what we would view as its self, HOWEVER “the whale” still exists and we can observe that “whales” are a thing that DO have an intrinsic nature despite the physical interdependent origination
so that puts us in kind of a weird place where the non physical essence of what a whale is actually exists but its physical manifestation is locked into this constant ebb and flow of things becoming other things. to me this naturally segues into a mind of God type situation ...
which nagarjuna i suppose could conveniently not deal with as thats not really part of the framework of buddhism (a creator). actually i was working on a comic about this specific problem but ive been driving like three hours a day taking my wife to natal-baby appointments
thats actually what im doing now. im just sitting in this car (my car, i own its spiritual essence embodied in its momentary physicality) under this billboard of a dog, and all the appointments are just long enough for me to stare into the sky but not long enough for me to work
what are you guys doing

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with owen cyclops.jpg

owen cyclops.jpg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @owenbroadcast

27 Sep
this is what oversocialization is btw. anything that trips the “thats not what youre supposed to be doing” wire sets off abject panic and rage (and fear) instantly. theres no sliding scale - your perception of social norms become a binary.
its basically impossible to function now in normal society (for most of you, i know many of u know this) without understanding the thought process here. this person did not hear the words and assess them. its “he said something not positive about the thing” wired to “hes INSANE”.
people you deal with like this are not responding to information. they are responding to sensation (the sensation and feeling of being uncomfortable). you cannot reason someone out of a sensation, because its an intrinsic feeling reaction. this is not necessarily intuitive.
Read 6 tweets
27 Sep
alright im stuck in my car rn and trying not to wake my wife up so its time for a thread on terrence mckenna. might have to pause at some point but lets do it.
so, if you dont know you can look him up, but he’s basically [the] mushroom guy. if you’re into mushrooms you would know who he is. mainly his ideas were disseminated in talks and a few books, he has a few interlocking theories about life, the mind, the universe, mushrooms, etc.
i suppose in the current popular “spiritual stuff” domain he would be most well known for coining the term “machine elf” for the beings people often see on dmt. he was an early DMT guy in the sense that he was talking about it when it was still ostensibly difficult to find.
Read 26 tweets
27 Sep
its my own view of course, but that isnt why. the process just doesnt work the way he hypothesized it to. honestly, i did it. i took normal people to art spaces and to the woods and gave them acid and they eventually go back to being the same or just become more “how they are”.
i was thinking about timothy leary recently because someone brought up terrence mckenna, and i kind of view them as a one two step process. they were both ultimately wrong for different reasons, i dont even really hold it against them personally, they just didnt have the data.
its easy to imagine being a certain type of person and taking acid and then thinking, wow, we just need everyone to take this. but that didnt work, and whats mostly interesting for me about the space is that you still have people acting like this massive experiment never happened
Read 13 tweets
26 Sep
yes, this is true - both in the sense that going completely down the political rabbit hole often leads to a theology (clearly observable), and in the sense that someones political views and the specifics of them invariably flow out of metaphysics that will constitute “a theology”
what basic rights do people have and why, and what does that even mean? look at all the traits someone has: which are intrinsic and which are incidental, and how does this affect how we would ideally group them? what does the ideal society look like, why? these entail metaphysics
most political differences people have even come back, imo, to a singular theological issue: what makes and determines reality? some people are playing a game where there are set conditions and we operate within them, some people are playing a game where we set all the conditions
Read 7 tweets
25 Sep
i have often wondered if our early memories implant deep in us and effect us or if we remember them because of how we turned out. my earliest memory is visiting my great grandmother in the hospital and seeing a sunflower picture i made for her on the wall. epic foreshadowing.
i remember walking in this room, and, because i was short, it seemed like 30, 40 feet up on the wall, was this drawing of a sunflower. i can still see it in my mind. i remember thinking “woah, i made that”. im assuming i only had a tenuous grip on object permanence at this time.
but i do remember cognizing “wow. i made that. and its here... in this room, where these people are. thats crazy”. it was a classic little kid scribbley drawing of a sunflower. i had this memory but didn’t know what it was until i mentioned it to my mom, who told me the context.
Read 5 tweets
22 Sep
one semiotic social-spiritual note that is interesting considering the last year is how "normal people" talk about illness and medical stuff with others. i first noticed this around 3 years ago when a friend got this medical problem, and i noticed how people talked about it [..]
i noticed that, all the time, if we were somewhere and he said, "yeah, I have X", people would say something like "oh man, my uncle died from that". it happened all. the. time. and he's just standing there like, "okay... cool. thanks... for that information...?".
since then i notice this quite often. that someone will mention having a medical problem or potentially having one and people will just immediately say something like that. "oh yeah, a lot of people are dying from that now", or something. that is socially acceptable, for sure.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(