Joe Profile picture
14 Oct, 20 tweets, 8 min read
Wow…have you read the testimony of Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen? The link is below. The thread attempts to provide context and highlights what I found to be of some importance. Wow…just…wow. 🧵👇🏻 judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Chuck Grassley, the Senate Pro Tempore who was poised to step in if Pence didn’t certify the election as per Point 1 in the Eastman Memo, defense of trump is that trump ‘listened to his advisors and didn’t replace Rosen with Clark for not sending the Clark letter so no harm.’📌1
While true-ish it also completely negates the fact that there *was* a Clark letter to begin with. Yes, there was a meeting in the Oval in which 6 of the 7 lawyers present thought the Jeffrey Clark scheme was a bad one. The 7th lawyer was Clark.
It was a bad idea. It wasn’t grounded in law or reality. The most important question of all is How did the Clark letter come to be? How did trump and Clark connect for Clark to produce such a letter to begin with? Image
As you can see, this is a question not only I have, but Rosen had. And it turns out there is an answer.👀🍿 Image
@January6thCmte is going to want to speak with congressman Scott Perry from Pennsylvania. Not only should Clark never have been in the Oval with Perry and trump, but the WH council didn’t even know about the meeting either. inquirer.com/politics/penns…
WH counsel didn’t know Clark was meeting with the president. Rosen didn’t know, Rosen’s number 2 Deputy Atty General Donoghue didn’t know Clark was meeting with the president. When they found out, they started to wonder, wtf happened to Jeff Clark? And with good reason. Image
The Chinese thermostats weren’t the only crazy out there theories. Remember Italygate? Wherein WH Chief of Staff Mark Meadows sent an email to Rosen saying Italy had satellites changing votes on the Dominion machines? This was plausible to Clark?
But now, let’s remember something else. Mark Meadows used to be the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus. Rep Scott Perry, who seems to have brokered the Clark-trump relationship, *is* a member of the House Freedom Caucus.📌2
Remember when I said Grassley saying trump listened to his advisors was true-ish? He sort of gave the impression that because trump never fired Rosen and replaced him with Clark that there is nothing here to see.
As you can see here, trump did offer the job to Clark. Clark then had the stones to ask AAG Rosen to be *his* number 2 & stay on as Deputy Atty General! On a scale of Hugo Chavez counted votes in Spain to Italian satellites changed votes from trump, this is Bamboo in paper crazy. Image
While it may be factually accurate for Grassley to have said that trump listened to his advisors, it is also misleading. trump’s advisors (at least Rosen and Donoghue) knew the whole of senior leadership at DOJ we’re going to quit if trump went with the Clark plan. Image
That is to say, if trump knew because Rosen told him in the Oval, he listened to his advisors, but why then did he offer the job to Clark? Why did trump also accelerate the deadline for an answer on the job? Well, it was getting to be January and an Insurrection was coming. Image
I’m sure that had to have played a role in the decision making. How would it look for trump if 2 or 3 days prior to the Insurrection he replaced the AG? He already ‘replaced the brass’ at DOD when he cleared out everyone and installed yes-men like Mike Flynn’s brother Charles.
Now we know, at the very least, Rep Scott Perry has definitely earned himself a @January6thCmte invite if not a subpoena. Mark Meadows, to the extent he is cooperating, has a lot to answer for, and Chuck Grassley is being less than complete with the record.
AAG Rosen needs to testify in public. This deposition is from the Senate Judiciary Committee’s investigation and I do urge you all to read it. @January6thCmte needs to have him speak in prime time.
The Insurrection lives in the House Freedom caucus, folks. What was once the tea party and bain of Boehner’s existence has become hell bent on authoritarian take over.
END

@maddow @JoyAnnReid @ZevShalev @Heidi_Cuda @BaddCompani @LincolnsBible @jennycohn1 @gregolear @nancylevine
📌1. Chuck Grassley is mentioned in Point 1 of the John Eastman Memo. The Jeffrey Clark letter set the predicate for the Eastman memo to be followed. They needed both to pull this off. You can read that memo in here👇🏻
📌2. I mentioned Mark Meadows used to be the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus. Spend time in here to learn more about his successor Andy Biggs and what his reward for obstructing Obama was from another @January6thCmte subpoena recipient Amy Kremer.
P.S. Lest anyone wonder why didn’t Rosen just fire Clark for having gone behind his back twice, he couldn’t. Clark was a Senate-confirmed appointee. Confirmed by a Republican led Senate, by the way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe

Joe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DempseyTwo

8 Oct
The Subverting Justice report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee shows a scheme by former president trump to use the Department of Justice 🗣 to OVERTURN THE 2020 ELECTION. It reveals a lot more than that if we care to look. Here is a wee meaningless thread🧵👇🏻
Some may argue the first impeachment of trump for his quid pro quo with Ukraine on a not perfect phone call was meaningless because the Senate had no intention of convicting their golden goose that laid federal judges and tax breaks for donors.
Some may say that impeaching trump for a second time for inciting an Insurrection was meaningless. He was out of office during the Senate trial. Ted Cruz, a sitting juror in the impeachment, was seen providing aid to trump’s lawyers. It was a sham.
Read 28 tweets
7 Oct
We absolutely cannot allow the media to do to this Senate Judiciary Committee Report on trump’s Pressuring the DOJ to OVERTURN THE ELECTION, what they did to the Mueller report and Volume 5. These things are all connected and the context matters. 🧵👇🏻
The pieces are coming together. Jeffrey Bossert Clark (not in a position of leadership at DOJ) was making a proposal to the President of the United States, without the knowledge of his bosses, to send a letter to ‘relevant’ states 🗣to aid him in OVERTURNING THE ELECTION!!
The letter was not signed by then Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen so it was never sent to the states. The scheme was for the DOJ to tell the states they thought there were irregularities that should be reviewed. Just because they felt like there might have been fraud.
Read 20 tweets
7 Oct
Sen Kyrsten Sinema’s objectively hypocritical approach seems very Republicany. Why? When she was shoulder to shoulder with John Cornyn, I began to worry she was a plant so I took a wee look.

All plants need sunlight. 🧵👇🏻

azcentral.com/story/news/pol…
Sinema was the lead sponsor of a bill called S1967, the “Childcare Expansion for Military Families Act of 2021”. Her bill provides construction of child development centers. But she won’t support the Build Back Better Act which provides universal pre-k and other child provisions?
Sec 3 of Sinema’s Bill reads: ‘Education and Infant And Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Services for Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health’, but she doesn’t support the Build Back Better Act that would expand healthcare to children?
Read 16 tweets
29 Sep
Do you guys remember the Horowitz Report? It was the investigation done into “FISA abuses.” It was like the John Durham investigation before the John Durham📌 investigation.

It is really important for us to understand its findings. justice.gov/storage/120919…
You may remember, then chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham, leaned heavily on the Horowitz Report. He used it as a tool to beat up Andrew McCabe. Curiously though, he never called Horowitz in to testify about his report.🤷🏼‍♂️
But Joe, why bring this up now? Because John Durham who was tasked by Bill Barr to invest the investigators has just indicted someone for lying about a server being used as a communications channel in trump tower to Russia.
Read 22 tweets
23 Sep
It’s time for us to wake up, everybody. The alarm has gone off a few times. We’ve hit the snooze button maybe once too many. It’s cold water in the face time. The 6 point plan John Eastman put together to overthrow the government, was A 6 POINT PLAN TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT!
If you think that there were only 6 points to this plan, good morning, I hope you slept well. No matter how big you think it is, double it. Now triple that. This story is bigger than you know and more frightening than your scariest nightmare.
The @January6thCmte is going back to April 2020 with their requests. Their request letter has a ton of names on it you haven’t heard about, names you have, and those that you need to know but who aren’t listed. One such name is Russell Ramsland.
Read 41 tweets
21 Sep
I know you remember the crazy Kraken press conference given by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell wherein Rudy’s hair ran down his jowls. But do you remember the details? The trump campaign knew these things to be untrue when the lawyers said them.
nytimes.com/2021/09/21/us/…
In the thread above, you’ll see that Sidney Powell referenced vote %s being taken by an algorithm from trump to Biden. What was she talking about? Hammer and Score card, that’s what. It is coming together, folks.

@maddow @JoyAnnReid @ZevShalev @glennkirschner2 @BaddCompani
Let’s think this through, everyone. If Powell and Giuliani were aware what they were saying was not true, then everything they said in that presser is suspect. Including Powells mention of vote tally changes.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(