A confrontation between London and the EU over the Northern Ireland protocol carries grave risks for the unity of the UK, because views on Brexit are so much a matter of identity.
1/ The consequences of disruption to trade will be felt in the UK economically as inflation, shortages, real terms wage stagnation and weakness in the pound.
But who gets the blame depends on how people feel about Brexit.
2/ This #Article16Rising will play well in the “red wall” marginal seats that @Conservatives need for their majority, keep Johnson’s poll numbers high and give Brexit supporters a reason to rally around the
3/ It will galvanise @LibDemPress voters in places similar to Chesham & Amersham, and give their better candidates such as @edwardlucas opportunities to flip longstanding Tory seats.
4/ It will pile pressure on @UKLabour, keeping the tensions in its voter coalition alive, and delight @CCHQPress. This Tory majority was build on Brexit, after all.
5/ Yet though England will still back Boris, it will put heavy strain on politics in the rest of the UK
6/ In Northern Ireland it crates more space for the cross-community @allianceparty as Unionist parties vie for the pro-UK vote and Sinn Fein makes hay from heightened tensions.
7/ But it’s in Scotland where the effects will be most serious. The economic pain the confrontation causes will be blamed on London by @theSNP and most Scots will believe them.
8/ When Brexit identity dominates Scottish politics, the independence movement gains an important edge.
My forthcoming @MartensCentre paper on Brexit and Scotland will cover this in depth.
9/ Though many in England are reading the EU’s protocol proposals as a sign that they will get more if they push harder, the bigger risks are to the unity of the United Kingdom.
ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the day when a rare public rebuke of the UK by a visiting US president leads @thetimes pro-government commentators are wheeling out the excuses. But the reality is that British foreign policy has got into a mess.
A thread about why - and how to get out of it -
1/ UK foreign policy is in serious trouble. It is being undermined by attempts to wriggle out of the Northern Ireland protocol that the UK doesn’t have the power to execute. This is storing up serious trouble down the road.
2/ The justification for UK policy is that it the protocol was conceded under duress, and that the UK should try and improve the situation when the balance of power changes.
If this article turns out to be true the UK's integrated review is heading towards an unrealistic direction that will irritate the US and China, unintentionally make the case for EU strategic autonomy, and delight Russia. 1/
Even more than in trade policy, the UK can't escape geography in defence policy. Supporting democratic countries in Asia when China is becoming assertive is morally right, but unwise without the resources to back it up 3/
Biden will win this, but there are sobering lessons for the opponents of national populism. Thread.
1/ National populist candidates have appeal across different countries, and ethnic groups. They’re dangerous, and they’re not going away.
2/ They appeal to their voters in a genuine way, not only because of propaganda and disinformation. Voting for these candidates meets a need, and isn’t because people have been fooled.
Then we see that the Polish government’s anti-abortion cursade is failing - driving votes to the new Polska 2050 Party. And remember the far-right thugs outside Polish churches? They don’t need defending says the head of the Polish episcopate. Thanks @MaZaborowski
As another week of negotiations of rule of law conditionality opens, Hungary’s still applying the anti-NGO law that was struck down by @EUCourtPress — to funding from the EU’s own ErasmusPlus!
.@SuellaBraverman asserts that parliamentary sovereignty means Parliament is free to disapply treaties. This is not correct. If it were, as I explain in @ConHome today, the government would actually not have the power to make treaties. Thread.
1/ This has to do with the concept of a binding obligation, and the correlative right to enforce (or waive) that obligation.
2/ If the treaty contains a binding obligation one one party, it means the other party has the right to demand the obligation is performed, and hence the power to waive or enforce the obligation.
Before the referendum I wrote that a vote to Leave would turn Britain into Argentina, with Peronist politics, a volatile currency, leading to long term relative economic decline. 1/
It’s too early to judge the long term economic effects, but here are some straws in the wind 2/
Peronist politics: a politics where a self-dealing traditional elite uses the politics of resentment against a cultural elite to win over working class voters 2/