Good addition to the conversation about "evangelical elites" HOWEVER... I want to share a brief observation about this conversation from the grassroots
I live btwn 2 worlds. I've spent majority of my entire life in the working class but have a college degree & write for mid-upper class readers. I grew up poor & have lived on small church pastor's salary for 15+ years. But I've also traveled the world & move in academic circles.
For years, I taught conferences Fri-Sat in mid-upper class churches only to fly home to worship on Sunday at my rural church of >100. I've spoken at international conferences while some of my neighbors have never seen the ocean. (We can talk about imposter syndrome later.)
Here's my observation: Only a certain class of evangelical talks about the temptation of respectability. Only a certain class of evangelical worries about trends in academia.
The first time I encountered an evangelical worried about CRT or issues of diversity was an mid-upper class woman who was absolutely *beside herself* about what she perceived was happening at her child's university. I was stymied. I'd never seen this before.
What I eventually realized (b/c she said it) was that she was worried about her child's job prospects & that if they didn't accept a particular framing of issues, they might be blackballed from future educational & professional opportunities.
That's when it clicked: Mid-upper class culture rests heavily on social networks. Ivy Leagues aren't necessarily better education; they're access to better, more powerful social network. Future success depends on prof recs, introductions, getting job from your dad's friend, etc.
ALL of this is completely out of reach for poor & working class. Left to themselves, they don't care a bit about what happens in a certain dept at XYZ university b/c *they never had a chance to be there in the first place.*
They never had access to the social network that mid-upper class peers are so concerned about preserving. Like A. Ham, they "don’t have your name... don’t have your titles... don’t have your land..."
But that doesn't mean that the poor & working class don't get dragged into debates that have little significance for them. B/c what often happens is that conflicts btwn mid-upper class peers (on left & right) get reframed as a conlfict btwn "elites" & "grassroots."
Spoiler Alert: It's never about the grassroots.
So while I *am* sympathetic to the plight of those in academia & mid-upper class spaces who feel a certain pressure on them to conform, I have ZERO sympathy for conservatives who hide behind the poor & working class while they aim at their more liberal peers.
This is a conversation btwn elites. And that's totally fine! I am under no delusion that the world isn't stacked--that some people have more access to power & opportunity than others. But please don't act like what's happening in mid-upper class spaces is anything but intramural.
The real conflict btwn elites & grassroots looks completely different from the current conversation. And it's one that even mid-class conservatives generally can't stomach IME b/c it puts a finger on all the ways that the poor & lower classes have been neglected.
In fact, the real threat to poor & working class evangelicals isn't the "evangelical elite." It's that they've been abandoned to "elite evangelicals"--FAITH leaders who make their power & wealth off their backs.
The real threat to the grassroots are folks like Jerry Falwell Jr & Kenneth Copeland & Paula White & every other RELIGIOUS leader who's used them to pursue their own political & financial amibitions. All while living by completely different rules among... the elite.
All that to say, I'll believe you're really concerned about the grassroots when you 1) have true understanding of both their strengths & weaknesses 2) advocate for them in ways that challenge both left & right elitism 3) commit to discipling them & supporting their churches
(To this last point, too much of church practice & discipleship among poor & working class feel like hand-me downs from mid-upper class older sibling. By the time they get to us, they're worn out & don't fit.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think it's important to remember that hospitals are full b/c we have the ability to save people from an otherwise horrific death. They are full b/c modern medicine has kept patients alive long enough to have a chance to continue to live.
This must be factored into all our discussions about mandates & safety. Because, even if unconsciously, we are already factoring it into the risk/reward calculus of resisting such protocols. But this is not a freedom shared by those in the developing world.
Which helps us evaluate our own calculus--not of risk & reward--but of rights & responsibilities. What responsibilities do we have *because* we have access to lifesaving modern medicine when others don't?
Just left a comment on a FB post related to COVID vax. Saints, pray for me.
BUT on a related note... someone needs to look into how class divides are affecting people's confidence in vaccines. It's not about "trusting the science" so much as whether you know people you trust who are doing the science.
If you exist in a socioeconomic class that includes doctors, chemists, researchers, clinicians etc, you're more likely to have personal proximity to someone whose work you trust b/c you trust them.
Don't quote me yet, but I'm beginning to believe that the degree to which we are willing to own our particular sins is the degree to which we actually believe in grace.
It's one thing to confess the truth about human sinfulness. It's a very easy thing to do, in fact. But it's another thing to confess the truth about our particular sinfulness.
As a result, it's entirely possible to use the language of depravity & grace in such a generalized way as to make them functionally meaningless.
Obviously, certain people have higher risk of complications & serious illness if they contract COVID. That needs to be clear. Some people are more vulnerable & need more protection. But the way I'm hearing it used is more akin to, "This person didn't *really* die from COVID."
And the reason that frame is necessary, I think, is b/c so many folks have already bought the narrative that COVID isn't that serious. I think a lot of folks need to believe that they're safer than they are.
So I was up for at least 2 hours around midnight last night because my cat kept bringing live rabbits into the house.
As soon as I'd catch one & put it outside, the darned cat would bring another one in. (No, it wasn't the same rabbit.) A couple even ran behind the piano at one point so that was fun.
Around 1:30, I had a rabbit in one hand, a cat in the other, & a dog barking at all three of us.