Absurdly, Servant of the People faction leader David Arakhamia has proposed a law to “temporarily” prohibit private companies to sell gas at commercial market prices restoring the old disastrous post-Soviet policy of subsidization that reforms ended in 2015-16.
2. Arakhamia claims that this gas can be used to the benefit of budget organizations, just as in the old Soviet days. He motivates this policy in a populist fashion as hitting against three oligarchs who produce gas in Ukraine.
3. But who would it benefit? Ukraine’s leading gas trader Dmytro Firtash, who knows how to make money on distorted gas markets. Incidentally, Ukrainska Pravda revealed that Arakhamia traveled on Firtash’s private jet to Vienna in January and February.
kyivpost.com/ukraine-politi…
4. Suddenly, the world is experiencing an extreme shortage of gas. State-owned Naftogaz’s gas production has fallen sharply because of the politically instigated chaos in its management, but private producers have compensated for its shortfall.
5. With its intrinsic logic, since Naftogaz has proven least efficient, the current Ukrainian government has given nearly all the new gas licenses to Naftogaz, while proposing a price cap for private producers to deter them from production and investment.
6. Don't Arakhamia & the Servant of the People understand that such a policy would weaken Ukraine's national security, while benefiting Putin & Firtash?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Åslund

Anders Åslund Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anders_aslund

12 Oct
Can anybody explain what US Treasury Secretary Yellen means? "Yellen spoke with IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to discuss the serious issues raised by the investigation into the World Bank’s Doing Business 2018 report."
"Secretary Yellen expressed that her priority is to preserve the integrity and credibility of the World Bank and the IMF, and for that reason, it was essential that the IMF Board conducted a thorough, fair, and timely review of the findings by WilmerHale."
"Secretary Yellen...noted it is Treasury’s view, in line with other IMF Board members, that absent further direct evidence with regard to the role of the Managing Director there is not a basis for a change in IMF leadership."
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
Putin today: "gas reserves in many European countries’ underground storage facilities dwindled as a result of the harsh winter in early 2021."
Because much belongs to Gazprom & are filled to only 10-15%.
Gazprom should not be allowed to own EU storage.
en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
Putin: "the practices of our European partners [are to blame]. These practices have reaffirmed that, properly speaking, they have made mistakes. We were talking with the former European Commission"
How can the EU be blamed for Russian extortion?!
Putin's forecast: "the gas price has broken all historical records. Today it is approaching $2,000 per thousand cubic metres of gas, which is over ten times last year’s average price."
Read 5 tweets
29 Sep
Revisiting the Joint Statement of the United States and Germany on Support for Ukraine, European Energy Security, and our Climate Goals: "We recommit ourselves today to push back against Russian aggression and malign activities in Ukraine and beyond."
state.gov/joint-statemen…
2. The US & "Germany are united in their determination to hold Russia to account for its aggression and malign activities by imposing costs via sanctions ... to respond together to Russian aggression and malign activities, including Russian efforts to use energy as a weapon."
3. "Should Russia attempt to use energy as a weapon...Germany will take action at the national level and press for effective measures at the European level, including sanctions, to limit Russian export capabilities to Europe in the energy sector, including gas..."
Read 4 tweets
4 Sep
Excellent article by David Kramer: "U.S. policymakers have consistently failed to see Putin as a true threat who will only stop when faced with serious pushback."
politico.com/news/magazine/…
"“playing nice” with Putin plays right into his playbook. While Biden may seek “predictability and stability” in the U.S.-Russia relationship, Putin’s end goal is precisely to stir up as much instability as possible."
David Kramer: "Every time the West responds weakly or not at all, he pushes even further with his destabilization efforts."
Conclusion: "Time to take the gloves off and go after the assets of Putin and his inner circle. Time to back up our warnings with actions."
Read 4 tweets
1 Sep
The Joint Statement on the U.S.-Ukraine Strategic Partnership adopted today looks quite impressive.
whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Most important is security. The headline is: "Standing up to Russian Aggression" "The United States and Ukraine have finalized a Strategic Defense Framework that creates a foundation for the enhancement of U.S.-Ukraine strategic defense and security cooperation"
The US "is announcing a new $60 million security assistance package, including additional Javelin anti-armor systems ... to enable Ukraine to more effectively defend itself against Russian aggression. more than $400 million this year alone."
Read 11 tweets
20 Aug
The Biden administration has issued more dubious Russia sanctions on Nord Stream 2: 12 ships & 5 entities (?) but not Nord Stream 2 AG so the work can be completed. This appears just a cloud of fog. Why? Is the intention to let Russia complete NS2? Say so!
home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/…
"U.S. slaps sanctions on Nord Stream 2, project's opponents say not enough."
reuters.com/world/us-issue…
In order to confuse us, Treasury has thrown in Navalny sanctions and non-proliferation sanctions in the same statement. It would be better for the cause if the administration explained rather than confused its policy. This in itself requires an explanation.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(