I think I'm in the small fringe of people who's Shorpilled but not a popularist. I agree with @davidshor that PMC navel-gazing has taken over the Dems' discourse on cultural issues, but I'd prefer to solve that through bold Rooseveltian resolve than Clintonian poll-following.
Or in plain language, yes "Latinx" is silly and "defund the police" is a non-starter, but the solution isn't just to throw more money at the health care industry even if it polls well.
We need Democratic leaders who powerfully articulate a bold Rooseveltian vision for the future of this country, including things like green energy investment that aren't at the top of the issue polls right now.
And we also need Democratic leaders who can articulate a powerful *moral* vision for our country -- a modern-day equivalent of Roosevelt's "four freedoms" -- and use this vision to contrast America with authoritarian rivals.
When Roosevelt articulated his "four freedoms", we certainly didn't enjoy freedom from want or freedom from fear. But the idea of these freedoms helped differentiate America from the Axis, and reoriented American domestic policy in a positive direction for decades.
Democrats have crafted an economic agenda that does provide a vision for a better America, but in my opinion have largely failed to articulate that vision. What should be seen as a coherent agenda thus appears like a grab bag of progressive goodies.
On cultural issues, instead of articulating a positive moral vision of American values, Dems have largely confined themselves to reactive outrage against the transgressions of Trump and other Republicans.
This void of unifying moral rhetoric from Democratic politicians has left the progressive cultural stance to be dominated by activist and media figures who tend toward negativistic America-bashing rather than constructive positive visions.
This leaves Dems in the odd position of screaming about the threat to the republic from GOP coups and electioneering, even as they leave their cultural messaging to a class of people who mainly just condemns that same republic.
Anyway, this is a lot of words just to say that the Dems have weak leadership. We need leaders like FDR who can communicate a coherent vision of a better America and connect that vision to a focused policy agenda. And right now, we don't have such leaders.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The truth is that neither climate economists nor leftist activists is a barrier to solving climate change; they are both simply much less helpful than they could be.
The barrier is the fossil fuel industry and its political and lobbying clout.
The fossil fuel industry was, is, and will continue to be the force preventing action on climate change. Its political hold on the GOP and key Democrats is vastly disproportionate to its economic importance, and countering that political power is key to taking action.
1/One reason I'm so happy about the popularity of South Korean stuff in America is that I think it'll help Americans become less provincial.
One of my big theses is that most Americans barely even realize that other countries exist, and need to get out more.
2/In this regard, the South Korean wave is very different from the Japanese entertainment products that Americans like. Those products are mostly fantasy stuff -- cartoons, comics, video games...
3/Japanese entertainment products are of course influenced by Japan, but they are filtered through several layers of fantasy and whimsy.
Americans who get into Japanese fantasy generally aren't connecting with the actual country of Japan.