One of the 1st times I really zeroed in on this was when I realized that Indians (all Desis really) may be one of the only people who gloat about their service in an occupying forces' army (British Raj service - muh martial race).
Isolate that. Remove British/Indian.
You get invaded. Your people are pitted against each other by the invader. You become conquered. You are recruited into the conquering forces' army to oppress your own. And then you brag about your valor & militaristic prowess.
Maybe because I am not from "muh martial" background that I don't understand this. But seriously, if an alien looked at this scenario, they would assume the absolute worst of the Indian psyche.
Like I get the British Indian Army was a fearsome force. One of the most successful in the world at that time, but come on dude...
This kanging is honestly just a cope for defeat & betrayal.
But it gets deeper...I think the death-knell of India is that it lacked unity. A vicious and myopic tribalism infested the subcontinent much before the deservedly maligned Islamic & European invaders came.
But most don't want to accept this.
It touches a nerve across all of Indian society. A simple question:
What did India produce prior to 500 CE & what did it produce after 500 CE? Why did India change so radically & start decaying after that date? What's so special about that time period?
500 CE is when rigid jati endogamy calcified across India. I'm not gonna beat around the bush: endogamy retarded Indian society. It killed merit & competition. I get the arguments for tradition & diversity for today
But the hardening of caste endogamy coincides with Indian decay
At least some fluidity, competition, churn is needed in society for natural selection to create new winners & losers. Ibn Khaldun talks about how mobile raiders upend settled societies, become settled & lazy themselves, & get upended by another group, churning society...
Did this intra-societal competition even happen in India after 500 CE at the scale other societies had it happen? Imho, endogamy led to a stale & stagnant society. We slowly lulled into lethargy. The spirit of dynamism & adventure that spread Indian civilization across Asia died.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the disputed parts of inter/intra Dharma debates was the status of Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu.
I think what is most fascinating in the whole discourse is that Buddhism paved the way for the supremacy of Vaishnavism to supersede the dominant ritualistic Hinduism.
It's clear as day from reading Buddhist texts that his devotees had a deep "Bhakti" towards the Tathāgata. From the way he talked, walked, looked, everything about him, his devotees were enamored with.
Buddhism was filled with Bhakti.
Vishnu, so often seen as the Sattvik Lord of the Trimurti, of course shares this serene personality with Buddha, above base emotions and in eternal bliss.
Emphasis on ahimsa, shaven head saffron monks, universal access to moksha, the individual's relationship with the divine...
In 1860, the South democratically seceded from the US. The South felt oppressed due to the US not respecting their ethnic ideals & traditional way of life.
Instead of respecting democratic freedoms, Lincoln obliterated the rebellion as his troops committed horrid atrocities.
Ofc a ridiculous narrative that is routinely used in Kashmir where religious (& racial) supremacists purged the land of non-Muslims claiming it as their birthright. Meanwhile renaming Kashmiri sites & cities into Arabic & Persian & smashing the temples of their ancestors.
India has not even shown 1/20th of the ferocity the US & other nations have shown when it comes to secessionist elements
Gandhian tolerance & Nehruvian romance have won out instead of Lalitadityan ambition (Kashmir's greatest King who most of them probably don't even recognize)
Something that I can’t wrap my head around is now on earth Ambedkar thought that Buddhism was a religion centered on social justice.
Hot take but Lord Buddha endorsed jati-varna/caste more then Lord Ram or Lord Krishna ever did.
🧵Thread🪡
Across various sutras, Lord Buddha explicitly endorses the 4 fold varna system. Emphasis is placed on Brahmin and Kshatriya castes as respected communities and the castes where Buddha’s and Bodhisattvas are born into (All Buddhas thus far were born in Brahmin/Kshatriya lineages).
Jati especially is endorsed as birth based and it seems that in some ways, jati/varna are used interchangeably interestingly enough.
The passage below clearly shows how caste-conscious and conformist Indian/Buddhist society was during Lord Buddha’s time.
"There is no power on Earth that can undo Pakistan" - Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah
🧵 on Creating a New Medina by Venkat Dhulipala.
The political & ideological formulation of Pakistan & how the seeds of its creation lead to the rot of the present.
We start off with a legendary séance with the ghost of Jinnah who bemoans the state of Pakistan. As well as challenges to the idea of Jinnah being secular. The idea of Pakistan was founded on anti-Indianness & Islamic separateness/supremacy
The GOI Act of 1935 where the British tried to prop up regional chauvinism and provincial emotions to break the central revolution of Indian independence.
A mirror of the regional supremacist movements in India today who are detriment to the country
Thanawi noticed the closeness of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, an organization of prominent Deobandi scholars with the Congress, & sought instead to forge the JUH with the ML.
He sent questionnaires to both to inquire their goals. Nawab Ismail Khan of the ML, answered his questions.
The National Agriculturist Party began as a loose coalition of landlords, both Hindu & Muslim in the run up to the 1937 United Province elections (modern day Uttar Pradesh).
The tale of the NAP reveals the role of provincial panchayat level squabbling in the Partition
One of the NAP’s prominent leaders was the Nawab of Chhattari, Muhammad Ahmed Said Khan.
A frenemy of Jinnah’s, he parted ways with the Muslim League in a quest for power, believing economic interests would defeat communal interests (he still agreed with Jinnah’s supremacy.)
The NAP compromised of Muslim & Hindu Zamindars, landlords who believed they could strong arm their subjects no matter the religion in a battle against land reform (very familiar huh?).
They collapsed in slow motion once communal & economic realities hit them.