Except there is a reason, they overextended their real estate liabilities in urban areas & introduced a “Store Optimization Program” in 2017 & have since closed 750+ stores, according to SEC filings. Certainly possible shoplifting played a part but they’ve closed… 100s of stores
Mostly notably in NYC—where no such shoplifting justification was cited—where Walgreens closed 27% of their stores in 2020 vs 24% in SF. Walgreens closes stores all the time, for a host of reasons laid out in their corporate strategy -> s1.q4cdn.com/343380161/file…
No one is arguing Walgreens closed stores for the lolz, what’s being contested is they closed SF stores ONLY or LARGELY due to shoplifting. When asked by reporters and city officials to explain how this is the case and/or show evidence they get hostile and ignore the requests
Walgreens has tremendous incentive to embellish shoplifting as the ONLY reason (1) people are mad about the closings and corporations always blame anyone but themselves (2) they, like all large retailers, support harsher larceny laws, namely repealing prop 47
No one has ever doubted shoplifting is A factor, the narrative being presented in literally hundreds of headlines is that it’s the ONLY or DISPOSITIVE factor which doesn’t pass the basic sniff test. These decisions are rarely that pat and politically convenient
Again, mainline reporters from the SF Chronicle and SFGATE with no particular ideologically axed to grind—whose papers have been on the forefront of pushing the initial story—asked Walgreens for basic info on their internal economics and reasoning and they just ignored them 🤷‍♂️
Perhaps more details are forthcoming but in the meantime reporters are doing what they’re supposed to be doing, and ought to have done four month ago, which is ask basic questions and consider potentially ulterior motives of large corporations.
And anyone who doesn’t simply echo the retail lobby’s press release Official Narrative is viewed as suspect and off program and glib about the social costs inherent in large scale retail theft, all to further bully reporters into not doing the basic work of “crime” reporting

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam H. Johnson

Adam H. Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamjohnsonNYC

19 Oct
the ‘Colin Powell was a public servant who make “mistakes” and was simply lead astray’ obits put in focus a key asymmetry propping up our imperial moral ecosystem: US crimes are the result of discrete, good faith bumbling parties with little broader planning, whereas 1/4
crimes by Official Enemy states are uniform, topdown and existential to the nature of the regime. The Iraq War is generally agreed to be bad but in our popular depiction we are told it was the product of bad intel and a handful of good faith ideologues who simply went too far 2/4
Powell made “mistakes” and was just a soldier doing his part. Bush was pushed by neocons, the neocons were seduced by Chalabi, Again no such hyper compartmentalized, individualized, elaborate psychobabble excuses exist with Official Enemies. They are just a sinister blob 3/4
Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
Zero self awareness. To refute the claim US media has done a bad job covering the substance of the reconciliation bill Keilar shows a handful of decontextualized online articles & CNN screencaps many of which came AFTER Sanders and AOC pointed out the lack of substance weeks ago
CNN has millions of dollars, it could choose to pay its dozens of interns & researchers to analysis their reconciliation bill coverage, compare their horse race vs substance & show the comparative % instead it flashes random headlines on screen and moves on to pissy defensiveness
Sanders et al didn’t say the media NEVER covered the substance, they said they focused far more on horse race which is true EVEN IN THE SEGMENT DETERMINED TO REFUTE THE CLAIM
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
amazing that SF media has dozens of reporters assigned to the “Walgreens are closings over organized retail theft” beat and not a single one has asked the obvious question of “if CVS is subject to the SAME organized crime theft ring why have ZERO CVS’s closed in 2020 and 2021?”
Why did a higher percentage of Walgreens close in NYC during the same timeframe? What about the thing where in Aug 2019 Walgreens announced they were closing 200 stores over the next few years? What about the 2K RiteAid stores Walgreens acquired in 2018? Was there any redundancy?
Why do exactly zero people in San Francisco media (sans a couple token articles in the Chronicle) bother to ask these basic questions??
Read 4 tweets
7 Oct
Power-flattering pseudoscience that calls “authoritarian” statements like “We need to replace the established order by any means necessary” & “Getting rid of inequality is more important than free speech”—all under the assumption the status quo & poverty aren’t “authoritarian”
To the AEI author of the piece and the researchers she references the absence of POSITIVE RIGHTS such as housing, education, healthcare are not authoritarian. People dying on the streets is not authoritarian. Being forced into sweatshops is not authoritarian.
This is a capitalist liberal view of rights but it is not a universal or ideology-free thing one can objectively measure. One can view liberal negative rights as important but absent positive rights of economic security and healthcare and food and childcare they don’t mean much
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
just completely craven. Manchin's scam for yrs has been to rarely specify what anti-poverty program he wishes gut––instead engaging in phony, vague deficit concern trolling. Sanders called him on this, asking him to be clear & now he's cowardly putting the burden on progressives
to "pick just one", thereby shifting the responsibility back on to anyone but himself. Sanders et al called his bluff, insisting he SPECIFY and commit to a (very popular) program (that polls well) he wants to dump but he's too chickenshit to do this. So this is his only play.
Manchin has the evergreen excuse that he's just in a conservative state and Has No Choice But To Vote For Big Business but he never wants to commit to opposing specific popular things. Thus the need to pick arbitrary budget numbers under the thin pretext of Deficit Conerns
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
Every 2 years someone new just reinvents Third Way and thinks they cracked the Da Vinci Code
“What if we werent left or right but fact-based” is such a hollow, smarmy sentiment targeting a specific cohort of people who view themselves as existing outside politics, partly born from genuine failures of our political class, but mostly it’s just calculated self-help bullshit
yes! it's very popular and its why many run-of-the-mill conservatives have historically used this posture. See: Third Way, Bill O'Reilly. It's very effective and disarms people who see themselves as too hip for the right.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(