Share this page!

Rob Romano Profile picture
Twitter logo
19 Oct, 5 tweets, 3 min read
New York v. NRA (NY state court): National Rifle Association's opposition to motion to intervene

"This baseless Motion is a transparent effort by a member of the Association to frustrate the collective will of millions of members..." iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…
William Davis Affidavit
iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…

David G. Coy Affidavit
iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDoc…
Defendant Wayne LaPierre’s memorandum of law in opposition to motion to intervene
Joinder In NRA's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Intervene by Roscoe B. Marshall, Jr.
Defendant John Frazer’s memorandum of law in opposition to motion to intervene by Roscoe B. Marshall, Jr.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rob Romano

Rob Romano Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @2Aupdates

Rob Romano Profile picture
18 Oct
Nelson asks McDougall about mootness. Asks if it fits into capable of repetition but evading review, or should be just kept alive for damages. McDougall says the county never said they wouldn't do it again, and they still have the power to do it again.
VanDyke asks how neutrality plays into the 2nd Amendment (as opposed to the 1st Amendment).
VanDyke says the 9th Circuit has really watered-down the concept of reasonable fit in regards to the 2nd Amendment.
Read 22 tweets
Rob Romano Profile picture
18 Oct
Judge Nelson asks how Jacobson affects this case. Kleinfeld asks about the level of scrutiny that should be used.
Nelson asks if it matters how long the closures were: What if it was one day?

Kleinfeld says he's skeptical of the court imposing itself on government in a fast-moving situation.
Kleinfeld tells Villanueva that some of the restrictions seem "wildly nonsensical" to him.
Read 17 tweets
Rob Romano Profile picture
14 Oct
NYSRPA v. Bruen (#SCOTUS, 20-843): Reply brief for petitioners

"The state now retreats to the equally indefensible claims that the right vanishes in 'populous areas' and extends only to those with a 'non-speculative need' to exercise it." supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/2…
"When the state is not rewriting the historical record, it is attacking arguments petitioners did not make, while defending a law it did not pass and licenses it did not issue."
"The Court should reverse the decision below and hold that petitioners have a right to do what even the state now concedes the Constitution protects: bear arms outside the home for self-defense."
Read 31 tweets
Rob Romano Profile picture
14 Oct
NEW: Fischer v. Remington (S.D. OH): Federal judge orders man to pay Hornady $3,600 after falsely claiming that his rifle contained the company's ammo when it exploded, when it was actually using handloaded ammo from 1993. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
From Hornady's motion for sanctions: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Mr. Shope sent a letter to the court last May after learning that Hornady wanted sanctions against him, where he said that the company "was kinda nasty with me" and that "it wasn't a deliberate lie or my grandson would have won, not lost."
Read 5 tweets
Rob Romano Profile picture
13 Oct
It doesn't apply to the police's guns, though
Claims that "ghost gun purveyors" have "preyed on vulnerable communities"
Complains that a website didn't force them to fill out a 4473:
Read 4 tweets
Rob Romano Profile picture
5 Oct
"What really propels the plaintiffs’ view that Congress is constitutionally foreclosed from eliminating or curtailing the SALT deduction is their position that, until 2017, Congress had never done so. We disagree that the Constitution imposes such a constraint on Congress."
"And while they argue that the SALT deduction lowers 'the effective cost of state and local taxes,' they point us to nothing that compels the federal Government to protect taxpayers from the true costs of paying their state and local taxes."
"In fact, the history of the deduction helps the Plaintiff States virtually not at all."
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @2Aupdates has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @2Aupdates!

Read all threads by @2Aupdates

:(