🧵THREAD: I swear to God and sonny Jesus, if I have to explain to another Pro Vaxxx lunatic why using a 116 year old Supreme Court decision saying you can mandate vaxxxes is a dumbass idea, I'm gonna scream.
Get this through your heads, you clueless twots:
1/16
The case you're referring to, "Jacobson v Massachusetts," also established forced sterilization of women as settled law.
There's a reason "Jacobson" hasn't been invoked in 70+ years.
2/16
The SCOTUS decision below enables both mandates AND "cutting fallopian tubes," based on Jacobson.
This is the legal foundation you're basing your "Mandate Fantasy" on: --