Thread. The idea that "defund the police" is a "failed slogan" is one of the silliest things you see a lot of in the media today. If you hear people saying it, here are some thoughts on how to respond:
First, the idea that a social movement is a "failure" a few months after it first appears is odd. People like this would have declared the anti-slavery movement a "failure" in 1850, and would have said that women's suffrage, same-sex marriage, climate change, etc... all "failed."
Second, "defund the police" isn't a "slogan." It is a demand that people harmed by police violence make to get people to see that unprecedented U.S. spending on cops, weapons, and cages could be reduced and investment in arts, housing, schools, healthcare, wages, etc.. increased.
Third, what we are seeing is a panicked backlash by people who are threatened by the power/moral clarity of "defund": it asks for the most important kind of systemic accountability: changing our social spending priorities about what safety means and *who* can flourish.
Third, most pundits who talk about "defund the police" misrepresent it and haven't thought deeply about it. The police are historically bad at what they do, and mass human caging is horrible policy. In this thread, I talk about real safety and harm:
Fourth, the reporting on "defund the police" linked above is not rigorous, and serious people should not be citing it. It's filled with misrepesentations and bias. I lay it out in this thread, and the same flaws are in every similar media piece I've seen:
Finally, if all these pundits are saying is that they agree we should reduce investment in the machinery of caging and family separation and increase investment in vulnerable people, but they prefer other messaging, we should all talk strategy. But don't avoid hard conversations.
Thanks to the great @NewlandGabe for pointing out this fantastic related commentary by @Josmar_Trujillo medium.com/copwatch-repor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Karakatsanis

Alec Karakatsanis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @equalityAlec

20 Oct
Thread. The copaganda crisis is now causing a scandal at the Associated Press. This @ap article on Portland police is one of the single worst examples of media reporting on police I've ever seen. I explain below why it's so dangerous. abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/l…
The thesis of the article is that police are powerless to stop Portland from becoming "lawless" because of a relatively toothless law that restricts use of rubber bullets and chemical irritants. (The history of police violence and criminality that led to it are not mentioned.)
1st, note that the article is basically a police union press release. It takes a pet issue of the union and local real estate developers and is full of false claims (repeated without skepticism).
Read 19 tweets
17 Oct
Thread. This week, the New York Times's recent dangerous reporting on "crime" reached a new low. I try to document what happened carefully below, because what happens to the leading newspaper in the U.S. has effects on how we all get information about the world.
The NYT just published an article blaming nationwide corporate consolidation at Walgreens on a supposed wave of shoplifting by the poor in San Francisco. nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/…
As you read, ask yourself: who determined that this Walgreens press release blaming shoplifters for corporate consolidation should be a NYT story, and why did they chose to tell the story the way they did?

"All the news that's fit to print."
Read 17 tweets
16 Oct
THREAD: In January, I argued a case before the California Supreme Court. The question was: is it illegal in the United States for a human being to be caged and separated from their family prior to trial solely because they lack cash, even though they are presumed innocent?
Think about how easy this legal question should be. It is easy for people like my grandmother--she got to listen to the oral argument online and immediately thought we won the case because she believes that it's wrong to put someone in a cage because they are poor.
And yet, wealth-based human caging is so normalized (and beneficial) for prosecutors, judges, and wealthy bureaucratic interests that our civilization is still pretending to argue about this issue in its highest courts as if it's a serious intellectual question.
Read 7 tweets
15 Oct
Thread. This story of rampant physical and sexual attacks against children inside Texas's prisons for children is not an isolated incident of "bad guards." This is what child cages look like in every state. We must draw a few lessons: nytimes.com/2021/10/15/us/…
First, this is what Texas's child prisons look like decades after so called "reform." When the purpose and function of a bureaucracy is control, domination, punishment, violence, discipline, submission, and crushing the human spirit, it cannot be "reformed."
Second, notice that almost none of the rampant "violent crimes" against children were recorded by Texas police and prosecutors and judges as "crimes." When "crime data" is reported to you, it systematically excludes crimes against people in cages.
Read 7 tweets
11 Oct
Thread: There are some important things missing from the media's welcome attention on the humanitarian catastrophe at Rikers. Here are a few more things you should know about it: nytimes.com/2021/10/11/nyr…
First, not once in this story about the deplorable conditions at Rikers are the words "judge" or "prosecutor" mentioned. But know this: the most proximate cause of this disaster are the illegal and inhumane money bail, probation, and punishment practices of local judges/DAs.
Second, people have been talking about horrific jail conditions in thousands of U.S. jails since jails were created. Look at Eugene Debs' fantastic memoir Walls and Bars, or read this fantastic interview with Michel Foucault in the NYT from 1975: archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.co…
Read 9 tweets
10 Oct
Thread. This morning, the NYT published another dangerous piece of copaganda, filled with misrepresentations and strategic omissions, all to confuse the public into normalizing and supporting record human caging budgets. nytimes.com/2021/10/10/us/…
First, the NYT conflates cops budgets and "public safety." Without an explanation or evidence, NYT says increase in cops shows mayors "prioritizing public safety." The opposite is true. How does NYT write this clause without noting that experts disagree?
A cardinal rule of police propaganda in the NYT is that it always subtly suggests--usually in unsupported clauses in the middle of sentences presented as so unarguable that they require no citation--that cops are connected to narrow, vague notions of "public safety."
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(