"First-level thinking is simplistic & superficial, just about everyone can do it ( bad sign). All the first-level thinker needs is an opinion, “The outlook is favorable, ie the stock will go up.” Second-level thinking is deep, complex & convoluted."
Let's explain how to use 2nd order thinking (what smart people do) in a very non-PC lens:
- 3 decisions politicians made to take a rich state and turn it into a poor state bc they thought like 1st level thinkers.
aka "this seems nice, I think we should do it."
DECISION #1:
San Francisco 1st order politicians: We don't want to have so many people in jail for petty crime.
Decision: Make stealing not worth punishing.... by raising limits for jailable offenses to $950 stolen.
Meh, seems reasonable?
Second-order affect:
Target stores now close 4 hours early in SF bc theft is too rampant.
Show me your incentives I'll show you your outcomes.
2nd & 3rd order thinking would mean, they look to the cause, not the symptom.
Then you find a cure instead of a bandaid.
DECISION #2
1st order politicians: We need more tax revenue, our state is in deficit and citizens are mad.
Decision: Let's tax the wealthy more, they can afford it.
I think taxes well spent are amazing, so they can do that but..
How do we avoid these decisions?
Questions like: @farnamstreet poses:
- Ask yourself “then what?”
- Think through time — What do the consequences look like in 10 min? 10 months? 10 Years?
- Write down implications
- Who am I not considering?
- How could this go wrong?
OUR MAIN PROBLEM IN THE WORLD TODAY?
Too many people are 1st order thinkers.
Not enough look down the trail.
Don't be those people and watch what happens.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We launched a course and made $82,700 in 4 weeks...
Our model was do a thing (create a $1M newsletter biz), then create a course on how you did the thing ($1M newsletter course).
Here's what we did right and wrong so you can copy us:
I was clueless when I started Contrarian Thinking.
How clueless?
Like grope-in-the-dark-and-bang-your-shin-against-the-couch clueless.
A one woman show who had a full time job and no idea about internety-things.
So I got started and tried a bunch of things.
Many things worked well, but lots of other attempts failed.
So when contrarians began to number in tens of thousands and we began to hit 5, 6-figure months in revenue, all within a year, I figured was doing something right.
No waiting for 10 yrs for a startup IPO 🤞
No hoping your companies don't run out of VC's to pump $
No 100x, just slow & steady cashflow
My lane is boring biz's, profitable, straightforward and we help 'em grow.
I'm thinking of allowing investors into deals for the first time. Most biz's are my $, or big investors.
Twitter thoughts? Would ya'll theoretically be into it?
Needs:
- accredited
- prob need $25k+ to play
- not be obnoxious
- understand investing is always risky
Also, fair warning if I did this, it'd be:
- small investor base
- very regimented w/ set investor communications
- no 1-1 calls/emails
- no pitches
- quarterly updates
- team in place for IR not me
I ran institutional inv biz's for a long time. Not doing that again :)
So you want to get paid *ahem WELL* to write for a living?
Rad.
We need 1-3 writers who are:
- Annoyingly curious - to research, compile data, & tools
- NOT BORING ie can make things like car washes sexy... surprisingly hard
- DO SH*T on time *rare
Depending on company/article we pay:
- $150 - $1000 per article
- or retainers of $1000-5000 a month
- and if u r a unicorn FT
PLZ do not email below if you haven't read contrarian thinking first.
Our writing is serious, really good (wink) & not for amateurs.