2021 saw the warmest summer for the Earth's land regions, and is on track to be between the 5th and 7th warmest year since records began in the mid-1800s. For an update on temps, models, GHGs, and sea ice see our @CarbonBrief Q3 State of the Climate: carbonbrief.org/state-of-the-c…
Summer land temperatures were relatively flat until 1975, with only around 0.2C warming up to that point. Today, summer land temperatures are around 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, with around 1.3C of that warming happening in just the past 45 years.
NW North America, Eastern Europe, Middle East, Northern Africa, and Siberia all had an exceptionally warm summer. China, sub-Saharan Africa, South America and Australia were modestly above average, while parts of Central America and India were below average.
The figure below shows the temperature anomalies – changes relative to the 1981-2010 average temperature – for each year since 1970, along with the average over the first nine months of 2021.
So far, 2021 is tied for the 5th warmest to date with 2015 and 2018. It had a cooler start than those years, but warmer temperatures over the past few months have pushed year-to-date values upwards. However, there is a growing La Niña event in the tropical Pacific.
The table below shows how each month in 2021 ranked across all the datasets examined – with “2nd” indicating the second warmest temperature on record for that month occurred in 2021.
El Niño and La Niña events – collectively referred to as the El Niño Southern Oscillation, or ENSO – are the main driver of year-to-year variation on top of the long-term surface warming trend. El Niño years tend to be warmer than average, while La Niña years tend to be cooler.
La Niña conditions have played a role in cooler 2021 temps. Models now forecast modest-to-moderate La Niña conditions will persist through first quarter of 2022. This may result in 2022 being a bit cooler than the past few years as well, though it is too early to know for sure.
Using the data from the first nine months of the year, plus both past and forecast future ENSO conditions, Carbon Brief has produced a prediction of where 2021 temps will most likely land for different surface temperature records. (Hadley/Berkeley will be added when available).
The figure below shows the 2021 to-date temperatures and annual 2021 projected temperatures (with uncertainties) for Copernicus/ECMWF’s ERA5, along with the long-term temperature trend based on data from 1979-2020.
While 2021 temperatures will be lower than many of the past few years, they are quite consistent with the longer-term warming trend due to human emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses.
With each month of additional data, the uncertainty in the expected 2021 annual temps shrinks as there are fewer remaining months to change the average. The figure below illustrates this, showing that both the best estimate (red) and uncertainty range (black whiskers) over time:
Global temperatures have been well in-line with climate model projections from the generation of models used in the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (CMIP5). We will be showing a comparison with the new warming projections in the AR6 in our year-end review.
Human emissions of greenhouse gases have increased atmospheric concentrations of CO2, methane and nitrous oxide to their highest levels in at least a few million years – if not longer.
Arctic sea ice extent was at low levels for much of the first half of 2021, setting new records in parts of both June and July. The summer minimum was the 12th lowest on record. Average Arctic sea ice to-date (first 289 days of the year) is the 9th lowest on record.
There is a weird narrative in some quarters that wind and solar are pure good, while electric vehicles are a necessary (or even unnecessary) evil. This is wrong for many reasons. Yes, we should invest more in public transit and cycle more. We should also be more energy efficient.
But all replacements to fossil fuels will have impacts. Covering 14% of all the US land area with wind and solar farms is potentially doable – but it still has a big impact. EVs are heavier and thus potentially more deadly than ICEs, and batteries are GHG intensive to make.
This does not mean they are not worth doing. We can build much more renewables (and clean firm generation), invest in public transit, replace ICEs and EVs, etc. But if we pretend it will be small and beautiful rather than big and messy we are setting ourselves up for failure.
One of the biggest long-term impacts of climate change is sea level rise. Even in more moderate emissions scenarios we likely commit the world to many meters of future sea level rise over the next millennium – barring massive anthropogenic carbon removal in future centuries.
The folks at @ClimateCentral have an evocative new visualization of what sea level rise over the next ~1000 years would look like if it happened to cities today. They focus on a 3C warming case – consistent with best estimates of current policy outcomes: picturing.climatecentral.org
Of course, 1000 years is a long time. Who knows what our cities (or species) will look like that far in the future, what actions we might be able to take to slow down or reverse ice sheet loss, or what infrastructure we may build to hold back the rising seas.
The new @IEA 2021 World Energy Outlook provides more evidence that the world has moved away from high-emissions scenarios where coal powers the 21st century. We still have a long way to go to meet Paris Agreement goals, but are making real progress: thebreakthrough.org/blog/iea-repor… 1/12
The IEA WEO 2021 makes a number of notable changes to its scenarios. It extends its scenarios out to 2050 (vs 2040 in prior reports), and adds a new "announced pledges scenario" (APS) to model mid-century net-zero pledges that have proliferated over the past year. 2/
Heres a comparison of current policy (CPS), stated policy (STEPS), and announced pledges (APS) scenarios over time in the WEO. Note that IEA retired their CPS scenario after 2019, arguing that the world was moving too quickly for a current policy scenario to be of much use. 3/
Interesting op-ed on geoengineering today by @coralsncaves and @MichaelEMann. Unfortunately, I have to disagree with their suggestion that negative emissions technologies (NETs) are "unlikely to make a meaningful dent in atmospheric CO2". thehill.com/opinion/energy…
A thread: 1/14
In the article they note that IPCC scenarios that peak warming at 1.5C by mid-century later involve substantial drawdown of atmospheric CO2 that prevents further increases in surface temps and is followed by global-scale cooling after emissions go negative. 2/
This is broadly accurate; for example, the new SSP1-1.9 scenario overshoots mid-century resulting in around 1.6C warming, before falling back to 1.4C by 2100 though a very aggressive deployment of net-negative emissions: 3/
Oil and gas prices have been skyrocketing in recent months. This is effectively a carbon price – and a pretty high one at $67 per ton CO2 for oil and $62 per ton for gas relative to January 1st 2021 prices – but only as long as prices don't fall: nytimes.com/2021/10/04/bus…
Note that while expensive oil and gas can make clean energy alternatives more cost-competitive, there are real equity impacts on poor households for whom energy is a non-trivial part of their budget.
My assumptions (in case its helpful):
oil_price = 77 - 48. //dollars per barrel
oil_carbon = 0.43080 //tons per barrel
gas_price = 6 - 2.6 //dollars per million btu
gas_carbon = 0.0544311 //tons per million btu