1) The story of the Russian hookers peeing on Donald Trump almost certainly came from a Russian billionaire named Oleg Deripaska.
2) Christopher Steele was actually a contracted employee of Deripaska, at least Deripaska was paying Chris Steele for some type of work in the U.K.
Find video of Tom Cotton questioning Chris Wray about Steele working for Oleg. It's out there.
3) Oleg’s U.S. lawyer was a guy named Adam Waldman. You might remember that Adam Waldman was also the legal liaison between Chris Steele and SSCI then Vice-Chairman Mark Warner.
4) Adam Waldman is the connective tissue between Chris Steele, Oleg Deripaska and another name from the SSCI, former staffer Dan Jones. When Senator Chuck Grassley wanted to question the lawyer/lobbyist Adam Waldman, Waldman lied to avoid testimony
5) Oleg Deripaska was on his yacht in the summer of 2016 with a sketchy Russian sex/intelligence recruiter/worker named Anastasia Vashukevich (27).
6) Vashukevich is the Belarusian woman who was being held in a prison in Thailand under charges of recruiting women to act as prostitutes and escorts.
7) Ms. Vashukevich name surfaced early in 2018 when CNN claimed she had dirt on Trump and “tapes” of some sort relating to Deripaska and his activities with contacts around the 2016 election.
8) In the height of the Trump-Russia madness, CNN sent Ivan Watson to Thailand to interview Ms. Vashukevich in the hopes that she could validate the “hookers” and “pee-tapes” material that was in the Steele Dossier. However, by the time CNN arrived, Anastasia changed her mind.
9) It turned out the recording Ms. Vashukevich was promoting/leveraging, was actually a recording of Oleg Deripaska; and, at his request she returned them to him.
10) The tapes Ms. Vashukevich was discussing at the time (trying to leverage her way out of jail) was a previous recording by Deripaska of a conversation between Oleg and his retained employee Christopher Steele about then presidential candidate Donald Trump.
11) This is the conversation where Trump, Russian hookers and pee-tapes came up. Keep in mind, Oleg likely knew what Steele’s questions were for; Oleg knew what Chris Steele did for a living, and Oleg had a motive to snark at the entire operation and U.S. election.
12) Deripaska didn’t trust anyone related to intelligence operations in either the U.K or the U.S, and Deripaska had previously been burned by the FBI in 2009 after they asked for his help.
13) In 2009 the FBI, then headed by Robert Mueller, requested the assistance of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska in an operation to retrieve former FBI officer and CIA resource Robert Levinson who was captured in Iran two years earlier.
14) The agent assigned to engage Deripaska in 2009 was none other than Andrew McCabe.
The FBI needed financing and operational support. Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out.
15) Oleg was an easy and obvious source for Steele, and Anastasia Vashukevich just happened to be with Oleg when the conversation took place. She snagged the tapes upon departure, she was busted in Thailand and tried to use the info to get out.
16) Keep in mind, in September of 2016 Andrew McCabe was Deputy Director of the FBI, when two FBI agents approached Deripaska in New York – asking for his help. The FBI request was for Deripaska to outline Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort as a tool of the Kremlin.
17) Deripaska once hired Manafort as a political adviser and invested money with him in a business venture that went bad. Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money.
18) However, according to a John Solomon article (via Waldman), despite Deripaska’s disposition toward Manafort, he viewed the FBI request as absurd. He laughed the FBI away, telling them: “You are trying to create something out of nothing.” thehill.com/opinion/white-…
19) After Trump unexpecedly won the 2016 election, the entire apparatus of the U.S. intelligence system and DOJ turned on Deripaska because he now represented a risk.
1) Last thread on current FBI motive to throw a bag over Deripaska.
Remember, Lisa Monaco is Deputy AG, and John Carlin is back in the DOJ-NSD position. Both of them participated in the illegal political surveillance operations against candidate Trump (that involved Deripaska)
2) Byron York previously outlined documents showing the communication between Trump Dossier author Christopher Steele and DOJ official Bruce Ohr.
3) Within the early 2016 discussions, Chris Steele appeared to be advocating to Bruce Ohr on behalf of Oleg Deripaska who was banned from travel into the U.S. by the State Department.
AG Merrick Garland’s Daughter Married to Co-Founder of Company Selling Critical Race Theory Resource Material to School Districts zpr.io/rrrm5VcGQeHg
Last Month..."Existing backers Owl Ventures, Emerson Collective, Uncork Capital, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and Tao Capital Partners"...
I do not appreciate the label of "personality cult". Specifically because policies of the Trump doctrine are unique to Trump. His use of strategic econ leverage to achieve national security & expanded econ growth objectives are unmatched.
Overlooked by most financial pundits Trump pre-positioned risk mgmt with the basis for their analysis & internal investment advice.
In a similar move 2018, President Trump suspended tariffs against China based on an agreement (G20 in Argentina).
Overlooked by almost everyone. Pay close attention to the reason why General Mark Milley contacted the Chinese, as Milley stated during his testimony.
2) Video at 09:51
..."The specific purpose of the October and January calls were generated by concerning intelligence, which caused us to believe the Chinese were worried about an attack on them by the United States.”
3) The U.S. Intelligence Community, aka The Fourth Branch of Government, determined the Chinese were concerned.
...Why would John Durham spend 27 pages, outlining in painstaking detail the Sussmann background, if his true intent was to simply to spray paint the rusting corruption?
2) The answer lies in really understanding how the DC system, that permits John Durham to exist, operates.
I mean the real system, how it works in actuality, not how the former insiders and defenders of the system want us to believe it works. But rather how it really works.
3) If you were inside the system and *initially* concerned about the very beginning of public scrutiny upon a series of corrupt events that took place.
If you were, say, in the latter part of 2017, and recognizing things were going to come out no matter what.