1) Last thread on current FBI motive to throw a bag over Deripaska.

Remember, Lisa Monaco is Deputy AG, and John Carlin is back in the DOJ-NSD position. Both of them participated in the illegal political surveillance operations against candidate Trump (that involved Deripaska)
2) Byron York previously outlined documents showing the communication between Trump Dossier author Christopher Steele and DOJ official Bruce Ohr.

washingtonexaminer.com/news/emails-sh…
3) Within the early 2016 discussions, Chris Steele appeared to be advocating to Bruce Ohr on behalf of Oleg Deripaska who was banned from travel into the U.S. by the State Department.
4) I strongly urge you to read the York article because I’m going to expand on the Deripaska angle from the context of the reader understanding the relationship.
washingtonexaminer.com/news/emails-sh…
5) It is likely that Oleg’s 2016 entry into the U.S. was facilitated as part of a quid-pro-quo; either agreed in advance, or, more likely, planned by the DOJ/FBI for later use in their 2016 Trump operation; as evidenced in the September 2016 FBI request.
6) Regardless of the planning aspect, billionaire Deripaska is connected to Chris Steele, a source for Chris Steele, and likely even the employer of Chris Steele. WATCH:

7) The FBI used Oleg Deripaska (source), and Oleg Deripaska used the FBI (visa).

Here’s where it gets interesting….
8) In a May 2018 article John Solomon reported that Deripaska wanted to testify to congress in 2017 without any immunity request, but was rebuked. Who blocked his testimony?

thehill.com/opinion/white-…
9) In 2017 Oleg Deripaska was represented in the U.S. by Adam Waldman. Mr. Waldman was also representing Christopher Steele, the author of the Dossier.
10) Waldman was the liaison Senator Mark Warner (Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman) was using to try and set up a secret meeting with Christopher Steele.
scribd.com/document/37110…
11) As you can see from the text messages, the House Intel Committee wanted to interview Deripaska. However, based on their ongoing contact and relationship Deripaska’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, asks Senate Intel Committee Vice-Chair Mark Warner for feedback.

scribd.com/document/37110…
12) Oleg Deripaska was blocked from testifying to congress. Now, it was obviously not from the HPSCI (Nunes Committee), but rather by the Senate Intel Committee, via then Vice-Chair Senator Mark Warner.
13) Now, think about this…. Yes, with Oleg Deripaska in the picture there was indeed Russian meddling in the 2016 election; only, it wasn’t the type of meddling currently being sold.
14) The FBI/DOJ were using Russian Deripaska to frame their Russian conspiracy narrative. It is almost a certainty that Deripaska was one of Chris Steeles sources for the dossier.
15) Now, put yourself in Deripaska’s shoes and think about what happens AFTER candidate Donald Trump surprisingly wins the election.
16) All of a sudden Deripaska the asset becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.
17) It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump vulnerable to blackmail; it’s the conspiracy crew within the DOJ and FBI.

In essence, Deripaska now has blackmail material on Comey, McCabe and crew.
18) After the 2017 (first year) failure of the “insurance policy” it now seemed more likely President Trump will outlive the soft coup.

In May 2018, Oleg tells Waldman to call John Solomon & tell him the story from a perspective favorable to Deripaska.

thehill.com/opinion/white-…
19) As the story is told, in 2017 Oleg was more than willing to testify to congress… likely laughing the entire time… but the corrupt participants within congress damned sure couldn’t let Deripaska testify.

Enter corrupt SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner
20) Warner, the same guy who told SSCI Security Director James Wolfe to leak the FISA application to media. Which he did. I digress...
21) The Russians (Deripaska) really did have leverage and blackmail… but it wasn’t over Donald Trump. Factually, Oleg had blackmail on Comey, McCabe and the DOJ/FBI conspiracy crew. Oleg Deripaska must be kept away from congress and away from exposing the scheme.
22) Guess who else must be controlled and/or kept away from congress? Yup, Julian Assange. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange had evidence the Russians didn’t *hack* the DNC emails.

23) Between Deripaska’s first-hand knowledge of the DOJ/FBI work on both the Dossier and the DOJ/FBI intention for his use as a witness; and Julian Assange’s first-hand knowledge of who actually took the DNC email communication;… well, the entire Russian narrative could explode.
24) Control is needed.

Control is a reaction to fear.
25) You can almost hear the corrupt U.S. intelligence officials calling their U.K. GCHQ partners in Britain and yelling at them to do something, anything, and for the love of God, shut down Assange’s access to the internet STAT…. Yeah, funny that.
26) By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc.
27) And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?
28) Throughout the Trump term in office the DOJ, FBI and intelligence community protected themselves by impugning the motives of Oleg Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.
29) However, with Trump out of office the intent of those same DOJ and FBI officials shifts from impugning motives to putting a bag over Deripaska and keeping him locked down.
30) On the day after Mueller completed his investigation in April 2019 the FBI moved to arrest Julian Assange.

On the day after Chris Steele and ABC broadcast their Steele Dossier documentary, the FBI moves to raid Oleg Deripaska.

See how that works?
31) /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheLastRefuge

TheLastRefuge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastRefuge2

19 Oct
1) The story of the Russian hookers peeing on Donald Trump almost certainly came from a Russian billionaire named Oleg Deripaska.
2) Christopher Steele was actually a contracted employee of Deripaska, at least Deripaska was paying Chris Steele for some type of work in the U.K.

Find video of Tom Cotton questioning Chris Wray about Steele working for Oleg. It's out there.
3) Oleg’s U.S. lawyer was a guy named Adam Waldman. You might remember that Adam Waldman was also the legal liaison between Chris Steele and SSCI then Vice-Chairman Mark Warner.

theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2018/08/2…
Read 21 tweets
11 Oct
2) When there is virtual zero risk to children and they want to jab age 5 and up children, it means this is not about health. Image
3) When a jabbed and an unjabbed person can both get and transmit the virus but only the unjabbed loses their job, it means this is not about health.
4) When Americans lose the right to decide what goes into their body, it means this is not about health.
Read 12 tweets
6 Oct
AG Merrick Garland’s Daughter Married to Co-Founder of Company Selling Critical Race Theory Resource Material to School Districts
zpr.io/rrrm5VcGQeHg
Last Month..."Existing backers Owl Ventures, Emerson Collective, Uncork Capital, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and Tao Capital Partners"...

techcrunch.com/2021/09/02/pan…

cc: @BenjaminT0001 , @almostjingo , @MWBarnesEsq
AG Merrick Garland's son-in-law's real name is Alexander Newman Tanner.

Why would he want to go by the name "Xan"?
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
I do not appreciate the label of "personality cult". Specifically because policies of the Trump doctrine are unique to Trump. His use of strategic econ leverage to achieve national security & expanded econ growth objectives are unmatched.

I will debate anyone on this.
The border security and migration “agreement” with Mexico was a brilliant example of President Trump in action.

Most were so focused on ridiculous personality issues they had no idea what he put into place.

state.gov/u-s-mexico-joi…
Overlooked by most financial pundits Trump pre-positioned risk mgmt with the basis for their analysis & internal investment advice.
In a similar move 2018, President Trump suspended tariffs against China based on an agreement (G20 in Argentina).

theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/01/kud…
Read 16 tweets
29 Sep
1) HIGHLY IMPORTANT...

Overlooked by almost everyone. Pay close attention to the reason why General Mark Milley contacted the Chinese, as Milley stated during his testimony.
2) Video at 09:51

..."The specific purpose of the October and January calls were generated by concerning intelligence, which caused us to believe the Chinese were worried about an attack on them by the United States.”

3) The U.S. Intelligence Community, aka The Fourth Branch of Government, determined the Chinese were concerned.

Note what this is *NOT*...
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
1) A good and reasonable question:

...Why would John Durham spend 27 pages, outlining in painstaking detail the Sussmann background, if his true intent was to simply to spray paint the rusting corruption?
2) The answer lies in really understanding how the DC system, that permits John Durham to exist, operates.

I mean the real system, how it works in actuality, not how the former insiders and defenders of the system want us to believe it works. But rather how it really works.
3) If you were inside the system and *initially* concerned about the very beginning of public scrutiny upon a series of corrupt events that took place.

If you were, say, in the latter part of 2017, and recognizing things were going to come out no matter what.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(