Oops. @llaurieclarke, that’s unfortunate. A crashing mistake in your very first paragraph. @IndependentSage didn’t organise that summit. 😱 Oh & they’ve never been called ‘iSAGE’. 😱😱 And the letter you refer to wasn’t them either 😱😱😱 
This ain’t right either. ‘Activist’, sigh, Cambridge Analytica didn’t ‘break’ in 2016 & I’d love to hear more about this ‘troll army’ 🧐 Oh, & I don’t do ‘media support’ for the group that most definitely isn’t ‘iSAGE’ but if you’d answered my message you could have asked me that
Hello @bmj_latest. You literally footnote the paper yet failed to spot that the lead author *has nothing to do* with Independent SAGE. And that’s literally the opening to your article about how wrong they’ve been 😂
Oops.
Oops.
Thank God for ‘coincidences’ though.
‘When the names of official SAGE members were eventually published by the UK govt in May 2020, it cancelled coincidentally on the same day as iSAGE’s first official meeting - a coincidence that ISAGE has made much of’
😂😂😂
‘When the names of official SAGE members were eventually published by the UK govt in May 2020, it cancelled coincidentally on the same day as iSAGE’s first official meeting - a coincidence that ISAGE has made much of’
😂😂😂
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
