Apparently anyone can serve legal documents in England
It is recommended that you use a professional process server though as if the papers are not served correctly it can mean big issues in your court case later on.
Do we think these papers were served correctly?
At a bare minimum, the woman forced to receive these "legal documents" would have had to sign for each envelope to show that she received them
She would also have to agree that she is capable of acting as a representative of the person named in the papers
Now, I am not a lawyer but I would think that anyone other that the Trust's executive, their personal PA or the trust's solicitor would NOT be the recognised legal representative
Some poor woman cornered by because they thought she was an easy target isn't any of the above
Let's talk about the documents themselves, shall we?
While anyone can write up a legal document - you can write your own will or a business contract for example - doing so could lead to a whole host of problems
For example, the use of an Oxford Comma changed the outcome of a court case
(and yes, I know this is America but it would be applicable in the UK too)
Let's assume that they are able to write their own legal documents (even for all the money in the world I can't see a solicitor penning a document stating the ways in which the NHS breached the Nuremberg Code)
You'd probably need to get them notorised
It's recommend that a notary sign if you "make a statutory declaration or affidavit for declaring certain facts and statements"
I would think saying the NHS breached the Nuremberg code and is practising child endangerment falls under "declaring certain facts and statements"
I'd love to know if they were able to find one
I'm sure there are some COVID-denying notaries out there but would they risk their reputation and their job to sign off on these "legal" documents?
Let's say that they somehow find a Notary who is willing to sign them
Are they now "legal" documents?
Well yes, sort of
You still need to get it formally legalised
To do this you need to submit it to the GOverment and pay a £30 fee
The service checks whether the Officials signature is genuine
And the way the documents were "served"? Well the idiots filmed it so any decent lawyer would have the serving of the papers thrown out.
I know we shouldn't be giving air to this fools, but I think it's important to know that we should not take what people say at face value
Remember:
It's okay to ask questions
It's okay to do your own research (please pick proper sources, YouTube does not count as reliable)
You don't have to agree with everyone, just don't force your beliefs on them
And most importantly, be kind
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk on why people really need to research the Nuremberg Code and Serving Legal Documents before plastering their idiocy all over the internet
You've been a lovely audience and I'll see you again soon
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anti-Vaxxers recently served an NHS hostpital in Colchester with "Legal Documents"
I've already covered the Nurember Code that they site, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"
So what is it?
I've already covered the Nuremberg Code that they cite, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"
The people who tried to use the Magna Carta to circumvent Lockdown restrictions are now attempting to use the "Nuremberg Code" to stop NHS COVID operations
Do we think that these people have ever read the Nuremberg code?
Well I have because I am avoiding work. Let's take a look
Contrary to popular belief, the code didn't come in the aftermath of the infamous Nuremberg Trials, the basics of it came into being in 1919 because even before World War II, the Germans were into some super-dodgy medical procedures
One of the biggest parts of this new code of ethics was the idea of "informed consent"
That means that in order to enter into any experiment, the participant must know exactly what's going to happen to them, who is going to be doing it and all possible outcomes
- Schools are safe
- World beating
- Something about Brexit and Vaccines
- Flu
- We're better than the EU
- Some really complicated looking graphs
- Probably blame Nightclubs for something
- Something about Pubs to appease Weatherspoons
- NHS not under pressure
- R Number
- Blame the North of England for something
- Moan about Scotland, N. Ireland & Wales
- NHS doing a wonderful job
Interesting to note that current constituency boundaries have been in use since 2010. Neither of the two previous boundary reviews (in 2013 & 2018) have been adopted or implemented
Both 2013 & 2015 recommended dropping the number of parliamentary seats by 50 to 600
The 2023 change keeps the number of MPs at 650
BUT
the changing of the boundaries would see an increase in seats in England from 533 to 543 with both Wales and Scotland having the number of seats representing them reduced.
This would lead to an estimated +15 for CON & -4 LAB