I am still avoiding work so let's look into "serving" "legal" documents, shall we?

An anti-Covid group served "legal documents" on Colchester Hospital

Apparently anyone can serve legal documents in England

It is recommended that you use a professional process server though as if the papers are not served correctly it can mean big issues in your court case later on.

Do we think these papers were served correctly?
At a bare minimum, the woman forced to receive these "legal documents" would have had to sign for each envelope to show that she received them

She would also have to agree that she is capable of acting as a representative of the person named in the papers
Now, I am not a lawyer but I would think that anyone other that the Trust's executive, their personal PA or the trust's solicitor would NOT be the recognised legal representative

Some poor woman cornered by because they thought she was an easy target isn't any of the above
Let's talk about the documents themselves, shall we?

While anyone can write up a legal document - you can write your own will or a business contract for example - doing so could lead to a whole host of problems
For example, the use of an Oxford Comma changed the outcome of a court case

(and yes, I know this is America but it would be applicable in the UK too)

edition.cnn.com/2017/03/15/hea…
Do we think this rowdy bunch are up on their grammar or are even aware what an Oxford comma is for that matter?

(I looked it up, you add it in after a list item for example

I like beans, cheese, and eggs

Rather than

I like beans, cheese and eggs)

grammarly.com/blog/what-is-t…
Let's assume that they are able to write their own legal documents (even for all the money in the world I can't see a solicitor penning a document stating the ways in which the NHS breached the Nuremberg Code)

You'd probably need to get them notorised
It's recommend that a notary sign if you "make a statutory declaration or affidavit for declaring certain facts and statements"

I would think saying the NHS breached the Nuremberg code and is practising child endangerment falls under "declaring certain facts and statements"
I'd love to know if they were able to find one

I'm sure there are some COVID-denying notaries out there but would they risk their reputation and their job to sign off on these "legal" documents?
Let's say that they somehow find a Notary who is willing to sign them

Are they now "legal" documents?

Well yes, sort of

You still need to get it formally legalised
To do this you need to submit it to the GOverment and pay a £30 fee

The service checks whether the Officials signature is genuine

gov.uk/get-document-l…
Now, I am not saying that the government would refuse to legalise a document based on its content but....

I mean...

Would they accept this though?
So yet again, a fringe group of COVID denying plonkers are using big words and phrases to scare people who are just doing their job

I really so sorry for the NHS staff in the video shared in the first tweet - no one should be afraid to go to work or be bullied for helping people
As we saw with my Nuremberg Code thread they pick up on a phrase (here "serve legal documents") and use it without knowing its true meaning

The likelihood of this group having proper legal papers is miniscule

And the way the documents were "served"? Well the idiots filmed it so any decent lawyer would have the serving of the papers thrown out.

I know we shouldn't be giving air to this fools, but I think it's important to know that we should not take what people say at face value
Remember:

It's okay to ask questions

It's okay to do your own research (please pick proper sources, YouTube does not count as reliable)

You don't have to agree with everyone, just don't force your beliefs on them

And most importantly, be kind
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk on why people really need to research the Nuremberg Code and Serving Legal Documents before plastering their idiocy all over the internet

You've been a lovely audience and I'll see you again soon

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Katy 🎃👻⚰️🕸️🦇🪦

Katy 🎃👻⚰️🕸️🦇🪦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @katy_whitton

22 Oct
Anti-Vaxxers recently served an NHS hostpital in Colchester with "Legal Documents"
I've already covered the Nurember Code that they site, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"

So what is it?
I've already covered the Nuremberg Code that they cite, and broken down why these documents probably aren't as legal as they think they are but one of the things that they mentioned was Motu proprio - which a few of us have nicknamed the "pope code"

So what is it?
Read 37 tweets
21 Oct
Of the back of my Nuremberg Code thread, some have been asking whether there is a legal basis for papers to have be served to Colchester Hospital

FYI I am not a lawyer, I just like researching random facts on the internet

So, Is the Nuremberg Code legally binding?

Let's see...
Well, in a nutshell, no it's not

(sorry to disappoint)

The code is an "ethical framework"

That means it's stuff you SHOULD be doing, not stuff you HAVE to do
Even if it were legally binding, the Nuremberg Code would only apply in Germany where it was codified

It was never adopted formally by the UK or, as far as I can tell, any other Government

And even Germany didn't put it into formal law

It's not legally enforceable
Read 23 tweets
20 Oct
The people who tried to use the Magna Carta to circumvent Lockdown restrictions are now attempting to use the "Nuremberg Code" to stop NHS COVID operations

Do we think that these people have ever read the Nuremberg code?

Well I have because I am avoiding work. Let's take a look
Contrary to popular belief, the code didn't come in the aftermath of the infamous Nuremberg Trials, the basics of it came into being in 1919 because even before World War II, the Germans were into some super-dodgy medical procedures
One of the biggest parts of this new code of ethics was the idea of "informed consent"

That means that in order to enter into any experiment, the participant must know exactly what's going to happen to them, who is going to be doing it and all possible outcomes
Read 20 tweets
20 Oct
We haven't done one for a while so shall we have a #BriefingDrinkingGame for the #DowningStreetBriefing in a bit?

Let's try and guess the buzzwords

- Next Slide Please
- Plan B
- Personal Responsibility
- Save Christmas
- Protect the NHS
- Sports Analogy
- Jabs In Arms

[cont]
More #BriefingDrinkingGame #DowningStreetBriefing buzzwords

- Schools are safe
- World beating
- Something about Brexit and Vaccines
- Flu
- We're better than the EU
- Some really complicated looking graphs
- Probably blame Nightclubs for something

[cont]
Even more #BriefingDrinkingGame #DowningStreetBriefing Buzzwrods

- Something about Pubs to appease Weatherspoons
- NHS not under pressure
- R Number
- Blame the North of England for something
- Moan about Scotland, N. Ireland & Wales
- NHS doing a wonderful job

[cont]
Read 54 tweets
19 Oct
We're flipping doomed

We'll never get rid of a Tory government with these boundary change proposals

I do agree that some redistricting is necessary due to population growth in certain places but this does seem to favour the conservatives massively
Interesting to note that current constituency boundaries have been in use since 2010. Neither of the two previous boundary reviews (in 2013 & 2018) have been adopted or implemented

Both 2013 & 2015 recommended dropping the number of parliamentary seats by 50 to 600
The 2023 change keeps the number of MPs at 650

BUT

the changing of the boundaries would see an increase in seats in England from 533 to 543 with both Wales and Scotland having the number of seats representing them reduced.

This would lead to an estimated +15 for CON & -4 LAB
Read 18 tweets
18 Oct
Austin Maestro Powers: International Man Of Mystery
#CarMakesOrModelsInSongOrFilm Image
Toyota Highlander - There's probably more than one

#CarMakesOrModelsInSongOrFilm ImageImage
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(