Last week, I posted about the Niebel case, highlighting Judge Warren’s scepticism about the harm caused by spam, and I wondered what this might mean about the current fad for data compensation claims. This week, I received a concrete example. (1/8)
In pursuit of unpaid school fees, a law firm employee emailed the Rolfe family, but alas, the sender got one letter wrong in the email address, resulting in the email being sent to someone else. The someone else was contacted and deleted the email. (2/8)
Claiming the incident caused sleepless nights and made them feel ill, the Rolfes (both parents and daughter) sued the firm for “misuse of confidential information, breach of confidence, negligence, damages under s82 of the GDPR and s169 Data Protection Act 2013”. (3/8)
The court was unimpressed. This is a summary judgement, with the Rolfe family’s claims dismissed as implausible. “What harm has been done, arguably?” asks the judge, before describing their arguments as “plainly exaggerated”. (4/8)
The Rolfes have to make an interim payment of £11,000 to cover costs, with more possibly to come. The only positive for them is that they can appeal the decision up to 21 days after Google vs Lloyd is handed down, in case it is of any assistance to them. (5/8)
Many such claims are settled to avoid high legal bills, but this brisk, no-nonsense decision shows what happens when hyped-up distress meets legal reality. The defendants also took the sensible precaution of getting a very good lawyer. (6/8)
I’m not an objective observer: I think most of these ‘loss of control’ claims are nonsense and I’m not sorry that the Rolfes got a slap-down. But as we await Google vs Lloyd, it’s another setback for the ambulance chasers after the recent failure of action against Dixons. (7/8)
I don’t know who made it and I don’t know if you’ve spotted it, but the fact that there is a single-digit mistake in the judgement that doesn’t really do any harm is amusingly symmetrical. Read it here: bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/… (8/8)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DPOdaily

DPOdaily Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @theDPOdaily

22 Oct
An individual used the #FOI website What Do They Know to ask @ICOnews about complaints made about the Met Police; effectively, they wanted to know how many of the complaints were upheld. The info was disclosed, but the response also contained an interesting statement. (1/7)
The ICO reply said: “Please keep in mind that there is no requirement to produce a formal decision in data protection cases such as the Decision Notices issued in FOIA ones.” whatdotheyknow.com/request/795467… (2/7)
There’s a solid argument that this is true – there isn’t a line in the Data Protection Act 2018 which is as unambiguous as S50(2) of the FOI Act (the Commissioner “shall” make a decision unless certain conditions are met. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct
On Saturday, two tiny drips of water appeared on the ceiling of my front room (I believe some of you will call this the lounge or the living room). We called a plumber and he said it won't be a serious problem and would get to us after the weekend. (1/7)
The very slow moving drip continued but by Sunday, it had stopped. By Monday morning, nothing was happening. Perhaps there had been an escape of water that had stopped. Perhaps someone had got out of the bath too quickly. It happens, come on. (2/7)
Our problem was seemingly gone, and I faced waiting in for and then dealing with the plumber. From previous experience, this would take many hours (the plumber is methodical and meticulous). Couldn't we gamble that the leak was over? And then that thought passed. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(