This article doesn't even mention the anti-trans rights LGB Alliance, for which Kathleen Stock is a Trustee, and which is the *main focus of the Sussex students' objections*, which shows how utterly bereft of basic journalistic standards this is.
https://twitter.com/harrytlambert/status/1450848479958470658
If this piece was a proper piece of journalism, it would note that Kathleen Stock signed the "WHRC Declaration on Women’s Sex-Based Rights, which Sussex University students contend seeks to abolish trans rights".
But there's no reference to it at all.
chican3ry.medium.com/the-whrc-decla…
But there's no reference to it at all.
chican3ry.medium.com/the-whrc-decla…
If you are going to write a piece about why Sussex University students are objecting to a certain academic, and you don't even mention the reasons why those students are objecting, then you are clearly not telling your readers the truth.
This is an insult to basic journalism.
This is an insult to basic journalism.
Fascinating to watch some journalists cheer on this farcical omission of any of the facts about Sussex students' objections to Kathleen Stock.
If this was an article with the same method opposing something they believed in, they would - rightly! - cry foul. Completely unserious.
If this was an article with the same method opposing something they believed in, they would - rightly! - cry foul. Completely unserious.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
