How we know that climate change is bullshit, even if it's real.
In this episode Gavin Schmidt and colleagues demonstrate the pathological bad faith that prevents them from engaging in cool-headed, rational, dispassionate, and objective scientific debate.
In this episode Gavin Schmidt and colleagues demonstrate the pathological bad faith that prevents them from engaging in cool-headed, rational, dispassionate, and objective scientific debate.
https://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/1451560843028705291
What this tells us is that the climate debate does not improve as its location moves from the Internet and its flame wars, up the ranks of institutional science and global political agencies.
This has been obvious to many since the late chair of the IPCC, Rajendra K. Pachauri asked, "What is the difference between Lomborg’s view of humanity and Hitler's?"
But Gavin and his pals have been at the centre of an project to spawn countless climate sceptics for longer than that.
As demonstrated by this childish performance...
As demonstrated by this childish performance...
Keep up the good work, Gavin. Many people have told me that you were their introduction to climate scepticism, and I can say with confidence that you encouraged me in their direction, too.
From a long time ago, here is another fine example of the graceless, boorish, angry fumbling of the climate advocates that has helped so many on their journey to scepticism, with many more to follow.
intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/global…
intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/global…
As a general rule, wisdom that falls from the heights that climate advocates claim, lands on Earth with more grace, you see.
That's how we
That's how we
... know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
