I've been studying Alberta political culture & public opinion for over a decade. I've learned that a lot of Albertans feel personally & collectively "left behind" by their governments, and by the pace of economic & social change that is challenging the "Alberta way of life." +
Acknowledegment is important. The continual airing of grievances by politicians who claim to be "standing up for Albertans" may feel good at the time. +
So, too, might spending billions of dollars on failed pipeline bets, war rooms, and public inquiries to identify and target "the bad guys."+
This is a timeworn tactic. Bible Bill Aberhart used to malign the "Big Shots" in central Canada for Alberta's woes in the 1930s. Ernest Manning played into communist conspiracies. Today, we see populists targeting the "Laurentian elites" and "activists". +
In all of these cases, Albertans are portrayed as victims of nefarious forces. It's a way of deflecting from the challenges within the province, painting the premier as a guardian of Alberta, and kicking the can on the hard work of getting our own house in order.
Thing is: eventually the provincial government is going to have to do something to help the people who are -- and who feel -- left behind. #Festivus is fun for a week or two, but eventually you have to put the aluminum pole back in the crawl space and deal with life. +
Waiting until the next oil boom or jetsetting across Canada in search of a fair deal won't make those hardships and perceptions disappear. It will only make them worse. +
We need our provincial government to stop playing into the victim mentality and put forward a positive plan to regain Alberta's stature as a respectable member of the national and international community. That's the #leverage we should be building.+
Instead, we get more bluster, more deflection, more distraction, more victimhood, more misinformation, and more anxiety.
Happy #Festivus, Alberta. Enjoy it while it lasts. The hangover's going to hurt and reality's waiting for us on the other side. #ableg
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First, the new law must designate who has final authority over federal-municipal agreements. It might be the minister of municipal affairs, or it could be added to the responsibilities of the IGR unit of Executive Council. I worked in the latter for 6 years under 5 premiers... +
It would make sense to keep all of the expertise for intergovernmental agreements in the same shop. This allows for coordination across policy files and would create a lot of efficiencies. So let's assume they make the minister of IGR (usually the premier) the ultimate approver.+
Take Back Alberta folks are fond of telling city slickers and experts they need to spend more time in rural areas.
As someone who grew up in a small town and whose research team spends a lot of time outside the cities... I don't disagree.
There are a lot of misconceptions.+
The regressive resolutions passed at this weekend's UCP AGM demonstrate that the reverse is true in equal measure.
Whether it's denigration or fear of "the other," the source is the same: mistrust and misunderstanding. +
University campuses aren't the training grounds for communists any more than small towns are chock full of right-wing reactionaries. They're both home to hard-working, compassionate folks just trying to make their world a little better.+
More than any other 10 minutes in her premiership, Danielle Smith's call with Artur Pawlowski makes it clear she is unfit for office.
Here are 5 reasons why. +
1) She took the call in the first place.
Smith admits she knew, if not admired, Pawlowski for his activist record. This includes, among other things, hate speech, homophobia, transphobia, and separatism.
He was also a charged man with a court case pending. +
2) She took the call without (qualified) staff.
This sort of call isn't something you should take at all, let alone solo.
If a lawyer, staffer, or the minister of justice were on the line at the time, her judgment is all the worse for selecting incompetent advisers.+
A lot of folks seem confused or disinterested about the dire effects of Danielle Smith’s Sovereignty Act on democracy in Alberta.
The constitution can be boring and tough to understand, so let’s try some analogies. +
There are 3 core problems embedded in Smith’s Sovereignty Act:
1️⃣ Cabinet shouldn’t do the legislature’s job.
2️⃣ Cabinet shouldn’t do the courts’ job.
3️⃣ No one should be compelled to break the law. +
1️⃣ Smith is asking that she and her ministers be able to write laws without having to table them in the legislature for approval. This would mean no public debate and no ability for MLAs to amend or reject those laws.+