I've been studying Alberta political culture & public opinion for over a decade. I've learned that a lot of Albertans feel personally & collectively "left behind" by their governments, and by the pace of economic & social change that is challenging the "Alberta way of life." +
Acknowledegment is important. The continual airing of grievances by politicians who claim to be "standing up for Albertans" may feel good at the time. +
So, too, might spending billions of dollars on failed pipeline bets, war rooms, and public inquiries to identify and target "the bad guys."+
This is a timeworn tactic. Bible Bill Aberhart used to malign the "Big Shots" in central Canada for Alberta's woes in the 1930s. Ernest Manning played into communist conspiracies. Today, we see populists targeting the "Laurentian elites" and "activists". +
In all of these cases, Albertans are portrayed as victims of nefarious forces. It's a way of deflecting from the challenges within the province, painting the premier as a guardian of Alberta, and kicking the can on the hard work of getting our own house in order.
Thing is: eventually the provincial government is going to have to do something to help the people who are -- and who feel -- left behind. #Festivus is fun for a week or two, but eventually you have to put the aluminum pole back in the crawl space and deal with life. +
Waiting until the next oil boom or jetsetting across Canada in search of a fair deal won't make those hardships and perceptions disappear. It will only make them worse. +
We need our provincial government to stop playing into the victim mentality and put forward a positive plan to regain Alberta's stature as a respectable member of the national and international community. That's the #leverage we should be building.+
Instead, we get more bluster, more deflection, more distraction, more victimhood, more misinformation, and more anxiety.
Happy #Festivus, Alberta. Enjoy it while it lasts. The hangover's going to hurt and reality's waiting for us on the other side. #ableg
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In democracies like the US & Alberta, we are witnessing a struggle to define "political culture," that set of norms & values that define what it's acceptable to say, do, or think in politics.
There are more than two sides to these struggles.
On one side are those who seek to roll back democratic norms to the 1950s (or earlier). They want to restrict rights, dismantle checks on government power that have been built ober the past 7 decades, and rule behind closed doors.
On another side are those seeking to preserve the gains made over the same peiod. They stick up for exiating democratic institutions.
On another side are those seeking to expand rights and spread equality to include more equity-deserving groups. They want to reform or replace.
To my conservative friends: It's okay to speak out against this UCP government. Many of us have supported conservative parties all our lives. We're scared of losing face, friends, or respect. This is bigger than us and bigger than party, though.
Conservatives respect voters' intent, local autonomy, the rule of law, limited government, incrementalism (not radicalism), timeworn institutions, Confederation, and -- above all -- stability.
The UCP represents the antithesis of these values. It's okay to acknowledge that.
If you're a card-carrying member, like I used to be, it's time to make a choice.
Staying silent is the same as condoning the authoritarian slide we're witnessing every day.
Speaking out within the party needs to become louder and more public.
First, the new law must designate who has final authority over federal-municipal agreements. It might be the minister of municipal affairs, or it could be added to the responsibilities of the IGR unit of Executive Council. I worked in the latter for 6 years under 5 premiers... +
It would make sense to keep all of the expertise for intergovernmental agreements in the same shop. This allows for coordination across policy files and would create a lot of efficiencies. So let's assume they make the minister of IGR (usually the premier) the ultimate approver.+