Zaid Jilani notes an email Supt. Ziegler sent out the same day as the first incident. Deevoe replied with a quote from the letter.
I replied to Deevoe, incorrectly, "The Sheriff's Dept. was apparently not notified till Scott Smith showed up at the school to complain."
But my tweet did say that the Sheriff's dept. was notified the same day as the alleged rapes occurred. So I never made the claim he wishes to pin on me.
3) I never said or implied that the Sheriff was trying to cover anything up. That's just more 🐴 💩
But #gammas gotta gamma. He has to be right about _something_, and thus prove his superiority.
My original point remains: the school board knew of the rape charges weeks before the hearing where Smith was arrested, the hearing where they claimed they knew nothing of any such incident. That sounds like a cover-up by the school board, a board desperate to get their #Woke
bathroom policy in place, and desperate to hide the fact that they've been breaking the law in regard to reporting assaults in the schools.
The #gamma just couldn't leave it alone. Long thread, probably boring.
By the "deputy" I presume he is talking about the School Resource Officer. The Daily Wire story that was my source said the SRO was "investigating" under the guidance of the school administration.
He now implicitly concedes that the DW story was correct: no one outside the school was called there to investigate until Scott Smith showed up.
Well before reading this latest post, I'd formed a hypothesis. Deevoe read a story about the incident, and misunderstood it.
He somehow got the idea that multiple agencies were involved. He tweeted to that effect. Then, when I asked for his source, he reread it and realized he was wrong. Rather than admit that, he tried to bluff.
Ah, a quote. I can copy and paste that, in quotation marks, and I get . . . "No results found" for the quotation. Various results without the quotation marks, as one would expect with a widely covered story.
First two sources quote the Daily Wire story, and support Smith's claim
The story quotes "dispatch records" showing the School Resource Officer (SRO) reporting the incident at 1:33 PM, but no outside police called to the scene until 2:21.
Two more calls are said to be made at 2:28 and 2;30.
And an interesting story from a local news station. They tried to get an interview with Supt. Ziegler, but were stonewalled when they showed up with a camera running. No interview would take place if the interview was filmed.
I saw the exchange between @Cernovich and @ twitter.com/Nomi33719537, and didn't realize what was going on. I looked at the article Cerno had linked, but missed the 2018 date. Rather misleading, Cerrno.
So I found out that someone was 'accidentally' shot on a movie set, although that story is mondo weirdioso itself (one round of something fired, two or three people injured by the same shot). I considered deleting my original tweet, then decided to apologize to Nomi instead.
But in only about an hour, Nomi's account has vanished. The now-nonexistent tweet accused Cernovich of believing that Baldwin had deliberately shot someone.
What Sky says. The "multiple major outlets" don't want to admit what anyone with a brain knows, things like 'some people who claim to be supporting a political cause are liars', and 'when you put males into the same space as naked women, many of the women will be distressed'.
So when news of the Wi Spa incident began to circulate, the "major outlets" REFUSED to investigate. They eagerly swallowed a story about how the whole tale was made up, and that the mother who complained was an #evil#transphobe.
Andy Ngo DID investigate the story.
Ngo found out the incident probably had occurred, and that the police had charged someone. QUIETLY charged the someone. LAPD wasn't very eager to publicize this.
His same arguments, when he has them, are made in relation to IQ tests, and they have been shot down again and again. E.g., the racial differences in the IQ distribution remain when you use tests without language, like progressive matrices. Or adjust for parental income.
He makes the elementary logical fallacy of imputing anti-black racism to teachers for watching black kids more closely for misbehavior, when the reverse may be true: a demonstrated history of misbehavior results in greater surveillance.
.#Protip: A nice example of deception, this. A calm reasonable tone. Who would guess Mr. William is #lying?
Yes, go read the letter at web.archive.org/web/2021093010… Although there are frequent mentions of "threats," the examples given are people showing up at school board meetings
and angrily opposing policy. Why, some of them even shouted, and made other loud noises. The Horror! Oddly, when done by #Leftists, this is regarded as perfectly legitimate.