The Federal Reserve sets short term interest rates.
But attempts to control long term interest rates are considered "unconventional".
In truth the Fed has full control of short and long term interest rates. The yield curve is merely a policy choice.🧵 apricitas.substack.com/p/the-yield-cu…
America's yield curve has been decreasing and flattening since the Great Recession. That means that short term and long term interest rates are decreasing, and the gap between them is narrowing. To understand why, we have to understand what determines a bond's yield.
Yields can be decomposed into expected short term interest rates plus bond risk premium.
Expected short term interest rates reflect expected future Fed interest rate policy.
Bond risk premiums reflect duration risk (bond price sensitivity to rate changes) and liquidity risk.
Critically, both expected short term interest rates and bond risk premiums are set by Federal Reserve policy!
If the Fed wanted to, they could pin bond yields wherever they pleased by changing expected future interest rates and liquidity/duration risk.
This is exactly what Bank of Japan is currently doing. Since 2016, they have set yields on 10 year government bonds to 0%.
They have not even had to "enforce" their Yield Curve Control (YCC) policy through large purchases of bonds. Their commitment is enough to keep yields low.
Credibility is therefore critical to successful YCC policy. Policy targets that are not seen as credible will fail to keep yields pinned down!
Understanding that the yield curve is a policy choice is critical to understanding the power of monetary policy.
Even if short term yields are stuck at 0% the central bank has tremendous power to affect nominal growth though its control of the yield curve!
If you like what I write, consider subscribing! It's free and helps me out a ton.
I wouldn't be able to write this newsletter without the support and feedback of my readers! apricitas.substack.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the last twenty years, the observed Phillips curve relationship in the United States has been extremely flat. In other words, the unemployment rate no longer seems to predict inflation the way it previously did. This has lead many to declare the Phillips curve dead.
But what if it was always dead? Hazell, Herreño, Nakamura, and Steinsson constructed state level price indexes of non-tradeable goods to measure the Phillips curve at different points in time.
Their results? A Phillips curve that is consistently flat!
János Kornai spent his life studying socialist economies. But what did he learn by studying the capitalist system?
If Kornai believes socialism creates a shortage economy, capitalism creates a surplus economy. Surplus inventory, capacity, and workers.🧵 apricitas.substack.com/p/capitalism-a…
In planned economies, firms are resource constrained because of their soft budget constraint. Because the state covers their financial losses, they hoard inputs and workers with no regard to productivity. In market economies, firms are constrained by profits and therefore demand.
Since demand is finnicky and unpredictable, firms keep surplus capacity and inventory. That way they always have products for consumers and can pounce on any opportunity for expansion.
In Kornai's mind, this surplus inventory and capacity is one of capitalism's main benefits.
First, lets take stock of the damage: GDP/capita in Greece and Italy were reset to mid-1990s levels. Growth in the Euro area has tanked. Even powerhouse economies like France weren't spared. The EU area's GDP/capita could be as high as Germany's if the trend had continued.
What happened? After the Great Recession, terrible monetary policy from the ECB almost destroyed the Euro. The ECB tightened too quickly and refused to act as a lender of last resort to member countries. Bond spreads - the risk differential between countries' debt - exploded.