How Iraqi resistance axis media brought back Kata'ib al-Imam Ali (KIA) into KH/AAH line?

Thread:

KIA's SG, Shibl Zaidi, tweeted on Oct. 20 that "the next gov. is inevitably a national unity one because political blocs need one another & they are forced to accept the other... Image
...this is a reality produced by a distorted electoral process & political sharing process since 16 yrs. accompanied by deep and accumulated failure. Those who posses vetos & preconditions will only be a delaying factor to national consensus...
...or put themselves out of the equation and flock. Manual vote counting for candidates who legally appealed is a legal right and religiously legitimate. Delaying & rejecting this is unacceptable and things will end at manual counting because there is insistence & grievance...
...The map in the [Kurdish] region is clear & the same applies for the [Iraqi] Sunni brothers. So there is no choice for the major four Shiites (Sadr, Hakim, Ameri, and Maliki) but to crystalize a project and framework with a unifying vision for commonalities and challenges."
This statement: 1) is a direct breach to the resistance-backed position held by the Shia Coordination Framework, 2) failed to recognize AAH's SG, Qais al-Khazali, as a Shiite power node along w Ameri, Maliki, Hakim...etc.

Zaidi however strived to balance his tone versus the SCF.
The result? Resistance media largely ignored Zaidi's statement, esp. on Telegram. Sabereen News did not share Zaidi's statement. Tura News & few others however did. Ignoring the statement by several key pro-paramilitary media was a form of punishment by mainstream resistance.
Apparently, this contributed pressure on KIA's Zaidi to issue another statement to reflect his conformity with the mainstream resistance & traditional Shiite political actors' line (i.e. SCF). Zaidi issued this statement three days after (Oct. 23) after his first. Image
KIA's SG: "We read & heard the clear and unprecedented support from the UNSC & UNAMI for the election's integrity and the magnificence of the electoral process & its radiance before deciding on thousands of appeals, which reaffirms our conviction & certainty...
...about the suspicious role that the [UNSC/UNAMI] plays, especially that we know that it is a tool for the West in exterminating states & emancipatory movements where its role is adding legitimacy & hegemony over 3rd world countries with its dubious resolutions & activities...
...and an example is its position on the repression of the Palestinian, Yemeni, & Syrian nations & a 13 year siege imposed on Iraq with injustice & confirming the presence of WMDs, so who believes in its integrity is delusional."
In response to Zaidi's statement (that contrasts cleric Muqtada Sadr supporting UNSC statement), mainstream resistance axis media rewarded Zaidi for his latest statement by widely circulating it. For example, AAH's Ahad tweeted bits of it (endorsement). Image
How did Sabereen and Tura differ in circulating Zaidi's 2nd statement? 1) Sabereen shared the statement as issued by KIA w/o mentioning Zaidi, 2) Tura issued the statement in the name of Zaidi & called him "Hajj" (used for seniority and respect in the resistance community). ImageImage
KIA's SG Zaidi is often associated w/ M. Kawtharani, a LBN Hezbollah convoy to Iraq, that KH & AAH have not been positive about for his alleged support for a 2nd Kadhimi term. Kawtharani's potential position is maybe why Zaidi issued his 1st statement.
This is not the first time Zaidi appears to take a position radically different from KH. In April 2020, Zaidi appeared to cautiously endorse Kadhimi's premiership. Not limited to KH, that position was different from Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada's hostility.
KIA is assumed to be part of the IRCC (Tansiqiya), although not a very outspoken actor and it does not have a strong media dep., unlike other peers. See: this diagram in @Mikeknightsiraq, Crispin Smith, and @HamdiAMalik's latest paper.
ctc.usma.edu/discordance-in… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tamer Badawi تامر بدوي

Tamer Badawi تامر بدوي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TamerBadawi1

11 Oct
A few hours prior to the Iraqi resistance axis' backlash against elections' results (e.g. see KH Askari's escalatory statement), Iraq-focused former Iranian diplomat Amir Mousawi congratulated cleric Muqtada al-Sadr on the gains he realized in elections.
Mousawi "hopes" that Sadr allies with the SoL/Fatah (whom he refers to as "the believing powers") to create the biggest bloc. Can Mousawi's conciliatory tone vs resistance brinkmanship indicate some sort of disconnection btw. Iranian policymakers and the resistance at this stage?
Already, friction was apparent between KH-AAH and Hezbollah's Iraq envoy a few days before elections as media figures linked to those two groups were criticizing Kawtharani for his potential support for PM Kadhimi.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jul
Spot on. The Iraqi Resistance Coordination Commission's wording in its latest statement issued today on US "combat troops" withdrawal was carefully ambiguously worded to provide the groups the leeway to (de-) escalate vs. US without rhetorical commitment to either tactic.
The IRCC commits to "readiness" to escalate against the US and this is different from commiting to "escalation" as an ultimate strategy and end to itself.
But a group like KSS, a key member of the IRCC, make it clear that their decision is "escalation" rather than mere "readiness". Its commander Abu Ala says: "The resistance's operations continue till the occupier is forced to withdraw in a servile way".
Read 5 tweets
28 Jun
Who speaks 1st on behalf of the PMF/Iraqi resistance casualties after US airstrike(s)?

The Iraqi Resistance Coordination Commission was probably the 1st to condemn US airstrikes, promising revenge (5:19 AM Baghdad). Aim: reflect an early semblance of Iraqi paramilitary unity. Image
The IRCC recently established a Telegram channel (Sabereen News shared it) and created a logo: a 16 vector-Islamic design may have been chosen to signal the multiplicity of actors involved. The channel and logo come many months after the IRCC 1st appeared in Oct. 2020. ImageImage
The PMF 14th Brigade Commander's comments on the event were circulated around half an hour after that of the IRCC (5:51 AM - Fariq al-Wilaya). Ahmed al-Magsosi expressed readiness to respond and take revenge, waiting for the orders of the "general command." Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(