Is Michael Mann in denial about the biodiversity crisis and the general ecological crisis? This is because it is now the second time he has blocked me for simply raising a point about it. Below are screen grabs of the exchange so it can be seen he blocked me for no valid reason.
Here is my very clear question which Michael Mann responded to. Note how I was only asking a very specific studies modelling biodiversity and ecological impacts. So Michael Mann's tweet response to me made no sense, because it wasn't about this. 
I made 2 responses to Michael Mann, which I will post alone on the tweet below to make them easier to read. This is just to prove I am not leaving anything out.
Here are the two tweet responses alone to make them easier to read. Then Michael Mann blocked me.
Note how I was respectful, and I made it very clear that I deferred to experts like Michael Mann on the question of climate and carbon dynamics. But my points were about the biodiversity and ecological component.
Why is Michael Mann so in denial about the biodiversity and ecological crisis, that he will block you for just mentioning it?
At least he might acknowledge it. That is why I am suggesting he is in total denial about it. All he seems interested in is promoting his books.
At least he might acknowledge it. That is why I am suggesting he is in total denial about it. All he seems interested in is promoting his books.
Really Michael Mann, you might think the climate and ecological crisis is just about you, but no it isn't. If you want to try and disrupt people having constructive dialogue about the crisis we have. Leave it to those who do. It isn't just about promoting your latest book.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
