Link to UK Parliament hearing - Facebook whistleblower starts momentarily. Chair of committee is @DamianCollins who led multi-party, impressive hearings in 2018/2019 and made himself into one of the smartest lawmakers on the planet regarding the issues. /1 parliamentlive.tv/event/index/cd…
For those who didn’t spend many hours tracking as Parliament DCMS investigated, tried to summons Zuckerberg to answer to cover-up and called them a ‘digital gangsta’, prepare for a session where they’re able to go deeper into dialogue and details rather than talking points. /2
As an example @DamianCollins is already diving into the mechanics of Facebook Groups and how they can amplify problematic engagement and recommend and organize groups and networks of groups around harmful themes. /3
Remarkable exchange between MP @MrJohnNicolson as he mashes with Facebook whistleblower on whether the company is “negligent,” “evil,” or “malevolent.” /4
I really like @DamianCollins follow-up here. It’s where an area where I feel pretty strongly and Facebook lost the most trust with me. Trust is earned based on how you act at a point of vulnerability. Once you know something harmful is happening, how did you deal with it? /5
I wasn’t expecting this line of discussion but 🙌🏼 it’s as if the Facebook whistleblower was a fly on the wall when I had direct access to Facebook and they failed to listen. /6
Good perspective why it’s not sustainable the only group that can ask questions and get answers from Facebook is Facebook itself. It’s important context we just learned from unsealed docs in lawsuit FB terminated PWC’s audit initiated by board after Cambridge Analytica breach. /7
wicked smart question as @DamianCollins connects dots between microtargeted amplification for advertising $$$ / profits and the microtargeted spread of harmful content. Yes, advertisers $100+B per year funds same systems that also spread harm. Profit > Civil society. /8
And @DamianCollins fact checks Facebook PR Nick Clegg’s silly misleading “two to tango” blog post putting blame of the users to accurately represent Facebook’s integral role in providing accelerated velocity and reach for harmful content. /9
In a sane world, this would freak investors on earnings day. Towards close of hearing we get to “Enron” discussion. First, whistleblower clearly points out the extraordinary percentage of new accounts which aren’t authentic (Facebook plays “denominator game” here, too). /10
And @DamianCollins rightly inquires why the ad sales wouldn’t be fraudulent. Whistleblower points to SUMA (actually means Single User Multiple Accounts based on evidence we helped unseal) and yes there is an active fraud lawsuit involving c-level. Will post thread below. /11
Here is a thread on SUMA, fake accounts, “potential reach” and advertising sales concerns and allegations including FT and WSJ reporting on them. /12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

26 Oct
And the Senate Commerce "We're not toxic like Facebook" hearing is underway. I'll thread thoughts here but having now read written testimony, Snap uniquely stands out as an "antidote" to the problems being uncovered in Facebook. /1
super interesting data point in Snap's written I don't think I've seen previously...throttling acceleration of velocity+reach for influencers until a human reviews it. "human-reviewed and moderated before it can be viewed by more than 25 people."
Opposite of FB's whitelist. /2 Image
And Sen Blumenthal pops bubble by saying "we're not Facebook" isn't a good bar because that bar is "in the gutter." I do think nuance is important here. Tech and social media aren't de facto bad. There are clear distinctions in Google and Facebook's biz model and market power. /3
Read 11 tweets
26 Oct
Tuesday morning, critically important this week is keeping real and not allowing Facebook to set its own reality and then hack attention with rebrand and event this week. Everything should be in context of the 75+ news reports yesterday on what we’ve learned, the facts. /1
Politico podcast from @birnbaum_e has a corporate comms source describing Facebook as “flailing.” That’s probably more right than wrong with CEO’s rant on earnings suggesting we should want more companies like Facebook and its results for the world. /2 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/pol…
There is a 10am Senate Commerce (same Committee whistleblower testifies) hearing with TikTok, Snap, YouTube execs. Facebook is desperate to reshape issues to be about all social media but the entire hearing and coverage should be in context of differentiating from Facebook. /3
Read 8 tweets
25 Oct
this is a nauseating and embarrassing enthusiastic sales snow job by someone with absolutely zero remaining credibility or trust as a CEO of a major tech company let alone one the one with the greatest impact on global information, civil society and democracy. /1
I'm trying to keep track of his adversaries he's trying to paint and neuter with these prepared remarks:
So far I've logged:
- apple's privacy improvements
- the whistleblower's leaking
- free and plural press "coordinating"
- antitrust enforcers

GTFO with the metaverse. /2
Snap CEO supported Apple's privacy changes. Sheryl Sandberg is about to lay out all of the problems it's causing for the company while not supporting them and instead trying to still hug small business. Every word should be parsed. /3
Read 10 tweets
25 Oct
Took a tour of the web while watching Facebook whistleblower testify (thank you, picture-in-picture). I’m going to post homepages here for the record.
Here are The Atlantic and Washington Post…
CNN and NBC News.
Associated Press and CBS News.
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
what a week for Facebook, Attorney General Racine's complaint just posted to the docket with Mark Zuckerberg now added as a defendant. This was widely reported last week but interesting to see (and not see). /1
By "not see," I mean there is a ton of redactions specific to Zuckerberg presumably tied to the limited discovery they've been able to do so far. As part of this, DC will increase its press to depose and do discovery on Zuckerberg, something FTC failed to do. /2
It seems something was more recently discovered that increased their interest in going for the king. /3
Read 8 tweets
24 Oct
3 things on latest WSJ edition of Facebook Files.
(1) Joel Kaplan shouldn’t be anywhere near or have any damn influence on Facebook product design decisions. He is frankly the antithesis of the integrity you want in decisions impacting informing the public and civil society. /1
As an example, and @WillOremus has covered, Twitter specifically does NOT include its policy and public relations people in these decisions. They are reportedly only told the decisions *after* they’ve been made to avoid this exact issue at Facebook. /2
(2) this statement from Breitbart PR, or whatever they have, has to be the most delusional statement they’ve ever made. I just can’t even believe they made it but it’s on brand. /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(