THREAD: why a special counsel to investigate the leaders of the coup is a good idea.
First, POWER: a special counsel has prosecutorial powers and can grant all their team members the full powers of a US Attorney. They can indict and their subpoenas are toothy. 1/
Second, SPEED: I know you feel like Mueller and Durham took forever, but it took only five months before Mueller started making it rain indictments on the likes of Manafort and Gates. It would be their ONLY focus, unlike the DoJ or FBI. 2/
Third, TRANSPARENCY: unlike the DoJ or congress, a special counsel is REQUIRED to disclose who & why they did or didn’t prosecute, & if the AG narrows the scope or blocks an indictment, they MUST tell congress they did so. DoJ doesn’t have to tell us shit. 3/
Fourth, INDEPENDENCE: special counsel has full power of a US Atty and insulates the AG and FBI from things they probably don’t want to be involved in. Sure, the select committee is bipartisan, but a special counsel is non-partisan. 4/
Finally, no, I don’t think it should be Mueller. Nor can it be someone like Yates or Schiff or anyone that would otherwise have to recuse from investigating trump over conflicts of interest. There can be ZERO conflicts. That’s the first thing donald went after Mueller for. END
PS: and if Laurence Tribe - one of the greatest if not THE greatest legal minds of our time - thinks it’s a good idea, it’s a good idea.
THREAD: a few people have expressed trepidation about my calls to appoint a special counsel to investigate trump’s plot to overthrow the government because “nothing happened” with Mueller’s probe. I’d like to point a few things out, if I may. 1/
First, Mueller didn’t do “nothing”. He had over 300 criminal charges against over 30 criminals with 9 convictions. Trump pardoned the big dogs. Biden will not. The reason you feel like Mueller did nothing is because Barr wanted you to think Mueller did nothing. 2/
As judge Walton concluded, Barr inappropriately redacted volume 1 to downplay the MASSIVE scope of Russian assistance to the trump campaign. Because of Barr’s “lack of candor”, most of those redactions have been removed, but MSM didn’t report it so you probably didn’t know 3/
BREAKING: Cy Vance has opened an investigation into Leon Black: the guy who gave $50M to Epstein for “investments”. He owns Apollo Mgmt which lent Kushner $184M. He also went to Russia with Donald and CALAMARI. I think Calamari is cooperating.
THREAD: I've now heard from multiple sources that the DoJ might be considering delaying a Bannon indictment for criminal contempt in order to secure a ruling from the courts affirming that Bannon's testimony has a legislative purpose. Now, let me be clear about a few things... 1/
First, there is nothing confirming that this is what will happen. I would strongly disagree with a months-long delay to secure a ruling on what we already know to be true: that the committee has a legislative purpose. BUT... 2/
It is a not totally stupid defense that the Bannon team would use: "If the congress does not have prosecutorial power, what possible legislative purpose exists to justify the compelled testimony of Steve Bannon?" 3/
THREAD: Reminds me of when @LeoDiCaprio had to forfeit a Picasso given to him by Jho Low who laundered money from 1MDB. Tom Barrack owned a hotel purchased by laundered 1MDB funds. Barrack was indicted in July & could be cooperating. I think this raid and Barrack are related. 1/
And the Senate Intel @MarkWarner made criminal referrals regarding Prince, #Bannon, Clovis, Trump Jr, and Kushner for lying to congress, but as with the House referral on Prince, Barr did nothing. Time for @TheJusticeDept to address these crimes. 2/ nbcnews.com/politics/justi…