1/ When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Last week Hester Peirce could not give a straight answer on if punks are a security. Her comments below
2/ "I mean, I’m gonna not weigh in on that, because I have Coy [Garrison, counsel to Commissioner Peirce] standing and looking at me and telling me that I shouldn’t...
3/ "...But I think there are a lot of – I mean, you’re raising an interesting scenario. And I think this is why people need to be very careful...."
4/ "...My advice to people is, look at your facts and circumstances, set them down on a piece of paper and then read it with the eyes of an SEC lawyer. And make sure that you get someone to think about getting the advice that you need before you walk down the road."
5/ I am probably the most conservative person on NFT twitter on the topic of "ooh, that looks like a security, people should be careful" but if we get into the mode that CP (that have no rights to anything) are a security, the SEC has truly lost the plot
6/ The trick/trap here is that everything should be looked at through "the eyes of an SEC lawyer"
Well, that is fine, but there are other laws and rights in the land as well, including constitutional ones, including the 1st Amendment
7/ If CPs are a security, then Warhols, rookie baseball cards and your university memorabilia are also a security. Give me a break.
We are not giving up free speech for utterly stretched interpretations of the Howey Test
8/ We need to start prepping the 1st Amendment defense of core NFTs now.
We might have to fight for it, and I am here for that fight.
You invest in real estate - the largest and most tangible asset class in the world.
You don't believe in any of this NFT mumbo jumbo.
What you are just buying a token? The JPG is somewhere else? What are you even buying?
2/ I regret to inform you (or, actually, am happy to inform you) that you are just like us.
You trade in in paper-based tokens with no intrinsic value whatsoever
Your assets are way off-chain.
Your "ownership" of land, houses and apartments is a 100% made-up social convention
3/ Wait what?
Imagine you are off to buy a house, on a nice piece of land, somewhere in the suburbs. Or a 1BR in NYC. Or a farm in the heartland. Or a ranch in Montana.
Maybe the Bitterroot Fishing Cabin (15 acres, 226ETH)
This is a branding disaster since nobody had ever used the word non-fungible before NFTs.
But I think we are stuck with it now, so we need to make it work.
Let's address the [Non-Fungible] part first
3/ To understand non-fungible, we must first understand fungible.
"(of goods contracted for without an individual specimen being specified) able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable."
2/ For me the most amazing thing about art is "you get to see the world through someone else's eyes"
What more incredible thing than this? I go through life trying to absorb as much as possible - through travel, through books, through as much inflow to my brain as possible
3/ Art is another way to do this, from very practical "here is a picture of an iceberg or person that I might never see IRL" to conceptual "here is what Dali dreams about"
We are going to make a run at changing the arc of history.
It is a Return of the Jedi vs the Death Star style mission.
They have the money and the power. We mostly have our brains, our community and gm.
But it might be just enough
2/ A step back.
6529 has been involved in crypto since BTC summer 2013.
From the first day, I was convinced that BTC and its successors would change the world, make it a better world, decentralize power away from choke points, and that this was a net good for humanity
3/ I played a small role in BTC's development and acceptance.
Small in the scheme of things, but important to me, and, at the time, it was a "risky" move.
And since then I have been waiting for our more decentralized social systems to emerge.