4. EcoHealth Alliance sensing that it is in deep deep poo 💩 , doubles down again by releasing a statement saying that it is not lying by omission, by lying by omission AGAIN.
Peter and EcoHealth Alliance have been lying by omission about GOF research funded by EcoHealth at WIV
9. This report sounds exactly like Peter’s attitudes and values when dealing with the US government and the EHA board of directors: lie by omission, cheat any way to get the money, and we can manipulate everything to fit our narrative to our advantage. See links in comments.
10. Jeffrey Dible, M.Ed, BSN, RN, CGRN’S comment
"A crisis of integrity resulting in the death of millions. A reason for a Nuremberg trial. Monsters live among us and in high places"
Andrew Huff, PhD, MS response:
Exactly. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
11. Jeffrey Dible, M.Ed, BSN, RN, CGRN
"Andrew Huff No faith in that organization. They are/were active participants in a counter intel operation against the former POTUS and even when fired for cause they protect their own"
Andrew Huff, PhD, MS Response:
"Exactly"
12. Ginger Sladky PhD Health Sciences
"How do we ensure we start seeing some consequences and accountability?"
Andrew Huff, PhD, MS Response:
(edited)
"Criminal court. Make an example of them.
They willfully disregarded the GoF rules and regulations"
"Not only does Peter have to be removed, but EcoHealth Alliance needs to be completely defunded by the government. Peter is not the only person to blame here. Peter had many enablers in the US Government, EcoHealth Board of Directors, and unethical EcoHealth employees"
19. Even More:
"There needs to be a full criminal investigation of EcoHealth Alliance and its managers, board of directors, and its corrupt US government managers and sponsors need to be investigated for corruption, racketeering, waste, fraud, and abuse"
There is no evidence for claims of a natural origin of COVID.
It appears that the scientists that paid attention in school are starting to win.
There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence that COVID is the result of a lab leak subsidized by EcoHealth Alliance.
Lancet (2)
"Here is a dirty secret about academia folks: How do you get a grant when the competition is so fierce? You complete the work BEFORE you ask for the money, and AFTER the work is completed, you ask the government for money"
"This is what happens when we contract out dangerous, high risk biologics research, to an NGO, that doesn’t have the technical capabilities, training, proper risk management framework, or the best interests of the United States at heart"
24. Lancet (4)
"This is a perfect example of why the US government needs to cut funding to organizations like EcoHealth Alliance, and academic organizations engaging in international biologics R&D"
"Even DTRA thought that these guys were in way over their heads" 😂
25. Lancet (5)
NIH was like keep doing great work Peter! 😐
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the US Department of Defense are the only US organizations capable of engaging in international biologics work, that won’t end up killing all of us.
They use a dataset skewed toward Yunnan & Laos (p. 16), leading to phylogeographic models that place SARS-CoV ancestors far from Wuhan & Guangdong (p. 12).
This sampling bias undermines the reliability of their geographic inferences.
23. Neglecting Alternative Hypotheses
No SARS-CoV-like viruses near emergence sites?
They completely overlook non-bat reservoirs, like civets or pangolins, which could explain local circulation (p. 15).
This omission weakens their claim of distant ancestor origins (p. 12).
24. Inconsistent Molecular Clock Rates
The paper misuses variable NRR-specific clock rates, which give inconsistent SARS-CoV ancestor dates (e.g., 1944–2014 for SARS-CoV-2, p. 9).
Without any validation of bat-specific rates, this approach has no rational grounding (p. 14).
"our inferences of the time of the ancestors of human SARS-CoVs and their closest bat sarbecoviruses are UNBIASED"
6. Captain Obvious Strikes Again (1)
"we show that the ancestors of SARS-CoV-1 & SARS-CoV-2 likely circulated in horseshoe bat populations 100s to 1000s km away from the sites of the emergence of these viruses in humans & as recently as one to six years prior to this emergence"
7. Captain Obvious Strikes Again (2)
"Our findings indicate that there would not have been sufficient time for the direct bat virus ancestor to reach the locations of emergence of the human SARS-CoVs via normal dispersal through bat populations alone"
Fragments of human SARS-CoVs share recent common ancestors with bat viruses
SARS-CoV-like viruses have circulated in Asia for millennia
Ancestors of human SARS-CoVs likely circulated in China & Laos
Ancestors traveled unexpectedly fast
2. No Pangolins allowed!
There is insufficient temporal signal when calibrating a molecular clock using tip dating with sarbecoviruses sampled from bats & pangolins, likely as a consequence of limited sampling across space & time.
Therefore, we used SARS-CoV-1 genomes!
3. Definitely no pangolins!
As sampling locations of SARS-CoV-1, 2 & pangolin sarbecoviruses likely do not represent where their direct bat virus ancestors circulated, we EXCLUDED their locations from phylogeographic analyses to avoid the IMPACT of dispersal of non-bat hosts!
"I worked with researchers in this space - virology + combatting future pandemics - in the decade before the pandemic".
2⃣ One Fact
"The one fact that the last 5 years never readily disclosed is that the core ideology of this community of researchers was fundamentally divided"
3⃣ Lab based creation of super-viruses
"About half of the researchers, including many leading virologists whose names appeared in the news, believed and argued passionately for the lab-based creation of super-viruses and super-bacteria"