3. This time all Huff's posts are archived for doubting journalists.

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.

(I have a dirty secret to share about this specifically - coming soon).

More evidence that Peter is a crazy maniac.

linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…

archive.ph/EGxgD
4. EcoHealth Alliance sensing that it is in deep deep poo 💩 , doubles down again by releasing a statement saying that it is not lying by omission, by lying by omission AGAIN.

I promise you, there is more to the story though…

linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
archive.ph/Ytk0I
5. More Interesting Huff Responses

1. We need to make an example of Peter and Fauci.

2. Even worse, he is partly responsible for the death and suffering of BILLIONS of people.

INTERPOL
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…

archive.ph/Ytk0I
6. Daszak partly responsible for death and suffering of billions of people quote
7. I worked at EcoHealth Alliance and reported directly to Peter Daszak.

The NIH documents prove that Dr. Fauci lied to Congress about gain of function research at the WIV

linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…

archive.ph/knefh
8. Lying by omission

Peter and EcoHealth Alliance have been lying by omission about GOF research funded by EcoHealth at WIV
9. This report sounds exactly like Peter’s attitudes and values when dealing with the US government and the EHA board of directors: lie by omission, cheat any way to get the money, and we can manipulate everything to fit our narrative to our advantage. See links in comments.
10. Jeffrey Dible, M.Ed, BSN, RN, CGRN’S comment

"A crisis of integrity resulting in the death of millions. A reason for a Nuremberg trial. Monsters live among us and in high places"

Andrew Huff, PhD, MS response:

Exactly. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
11. Jeffrey Dible, M.Ed, BSN, RN, CGRN

"Andrew Huff No faith in that organization. They are/were active participants in a counter intel operation against the former POTUS and even when fired for cause they protect their own"

Andrew Huff, PhD, MS Response:

"Exactly"
12. Ginger Sladky PhD Health Sciences

"How do we ensure we start seeing some consequences and accountability?"

Andrew Huff, PhD, MS Response:

(edited)

"Criminal court. Make an example of them.
They willfully disregarded the GoF rules and regulations"

linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
13. Dominik Pieniazek Question

(Engineering Consultant at HV Engineering, LLC)

Why isn’t this story HUGE?

Andrew Huff PhD, MS Response:

Great question!

The MSM is suppressing it.

I have the real dirt on EHA. 😈
14. "Don't get Suicided, Bro"
15. "I dealt with this maniac"

Write your congressman.

Please repost.

I dealt with this maniac.
17. Huff goes #DRASTIC

It turns out that the DRASTIC gain of function research proposed by EHA at the Wuhan Institute Virology was real (FOIA).

linkedin.com/posts/aghuff_p…

archive.ph/ScFQQ
18. More:

"Not only does Peter have to be removed, but EcoHealth Alliance needs to be completely defunded by the government. Peter is not the only person to blame here. Peter had many enablers in the US Government, EcoHealth Board of Directors, and unethical EcoHealth employees"
19. Even More:

"There needs to be a full criminal investigation of EcoHealth Alliance and its managers, board of directors, and its corrupt US government managers and sponsors need to be investigated for corruption, racketeering, waste, fraud, and abuse"
20. Huff blows a #DRASTIC #DEFUSE
21.Lancet:

There is no evidence for claims of a natural origin of COVID.

It appears that the scientists that paid attention in school are starting to win.

There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence that COVID is the result of a lab leak subsidized by EcoHealth Alliance.
Lancet (2)

"Here is a dirty secret about academia folks: How do you get a grant when the competition is so fierce? You complete the work BEFORE you ask for the money, and AFTER the work is completed, you ask the government for money"

linkedin.com/posts/aghuff_a…
23. Lancet (3)

"This is what happens when we contract out dangerous, high risk biologics research, to an NGO, that doesn’t have the technical capabilities, training, proper risk management framework, or the best interests of the United States at heart"
24. Lancet (4)

"This is a perfect example of why the US government needs to cut funding to organizations like EcoHealth Alliance, and academic organizations engaging in international biologics R&D"

"Even DTRA thought that these guys were in way over their heads" 😂
25. Lancet (5)

NIH was like keep doing great work Peter! 😐

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the US Department of Defense are the only US organizations capable of engaging in international biologics work, that won’t end up killing all of us.

archive.ph/WKZPp
26. Petrovsky's Question @vaxine_news

Have you talked to the US senate enquiry or provided testimony?

Andrew Huff, PhD, MS

Nikolai Petrovsky No. I need to get on some large platform with a mainstream audience where I won’t be edited.
29. Someone picked up on Nipah

AI Helps Identify Bat Species Suspected of Carrying Nipah Virus

researchstash.com/2019/07/04/ai-…

CONTAMINATION OR VACCINE RESEARCH?

zenodo.org/record/5067706…

@quay_dr @MonaRahalkar @BahulikarRahul
Unroll Huff Loves #DRASTIC @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillyBostickson

May 12
🧵THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE UGLY!

1. GOOD NEWS

Thanks to @BumblebeeJoe I have 250 new followers!



Welcome aboard!

To summarize the state of affairs in my world

As you may know, I am one very hard-working🙊

12-15 hours a day investigating "lab leak"✅
🧵2. My Recent Work

I demolished Pekar et al., (2025)

x.com/BillyBostickso…

This paper is so bad it is not even wrong!

Das ist nicht einmal falsch!

(Wolfgang Pauli)

azquotes.com/author/21450-W…
🧵3. I completed my 40,000-word final report

(Possibly final..😉)

The Pangolin (Coronavirus) Papers

x.com/BillyBostickso…

I provided summaries and explainers here:

x.com/BillyBostickso…
Read 35 tweets
May 9
“We are not a Cult”

DRASTIC and the investigative network that broke the Corona laboratory taboo

Must Read Interview!

The hard working "Two Ronnies" of DRASTIC

@gdemaneuf & @BillyBostickson

Interviewed by @franzbecchi for @berlinerzeitung

berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesell…
1. Who are the “pandemic detectives”?

We speak with 2 of DRASTIC's prominent members:

@gdemaneuf (a data scientist & engineer)

and @BillyBostickson, longtime activist who was formerly part of opposition networks in China & HK & who operates anonymously for security reasons.
@gdemaneuf 2. My Responses

How did DRASTIC come about?

I started in January 2020, triggered by an article by Dan Sirotkin on the origins of the virus.

I connected with people like @R_H_Ebright & others on Twitter.

In May 2020, I chose the name "DRASTIC" for this decentralized group.
Read 18 tweets
May 8
22. Biased Sampling distorts Geography!

They use a dataset skewed toward Yunnan & Laos (p. 16), leading to phylogeographic models that place SARS-CoV ancestors far from Wuhan & Guangdong (p. 12).

This sampling bias undermines the reliability of their geographic inferences.
23. Neglecting Alternative Hypotheses

No SARS-CoV-like viruses near emergence sites?

They completely overlook non-bat reservoirs, like civets or pangolins, which could explain local circulation (p. 15).

This omission weakens their claim of distant ancestor origins (p. 12).
24. Inconsistent Molecular Clock Rates

The paper misuses variable NRR-specific clock rates, which give inconsistent SARS-CoV ancestor dates (e.g., 1944–2014 for SARS-CoV-2, p. 9).

Without any validation of bat-specific rates, this approach has no rational grounding (p. 14).
Read 33 tweets
May 8
5. Why did they resort to using the POW model?

To show that :

"our inferences of the time of the ancestors of human SARS-CoVs and their closest bat sarbecoviruses are UNBIASED"
6. Captain Obvious Strikes Again (1)

"we show that the ancestors of SARS-CoV-1 & SARS-CoV-2 likely circulated in horseshoe bat populations 100s to 1000s km away from the sites of the emergence of these viruses in humans & as recently as one to six years prior to this emergence"
7. Captain Obvious Strikes Again (2)

"Our findings indicate that there would not have been sufficient time for the direct bat virus ancestor to reach the locations of emergence of the human SARS-CoVs via normal dispersal through bat populations alone"
Read 12 tweets
May 8
1. Last sick joke of the Zoonati?

Fragments of human SARS-CoVs share recent common ancestors with bat viruses

SARS-CoV-like viruses have circulated in Asia for millennia

Ancestors of human SARS-CoVs likely circulated in China & Laos

Ancestors traveled unexpectedly fast
2. No Pangolins allowed!

There is insufficient temporal signal when calibrating a molecular clock using tip dating with sarbecoviruses sampled from bats & pangolins, likely as a consequence of limited sampling across space & time.

Therefore, we used SARS-CoV-1 genomes!
3. Definitely no pangolins!

As sampling locations of SARS-CoV-1, 2 & pangolin sarbecoviruses likely do not represent where their direct bat virus ancestors circulated, we EXCLUDED their locations from phylogeographic analyses to avoid the IMPACT of dispersal of non-bat hosts!
Read 24 tweets
May 4
1⃣ Virological 🦠 Whistleblower 😮‍💨?

"I worked with researchers in this space - virology + combatting future pandemics - in the decade before the pandemic".
2⃣ One Fact

"The one fact that the last 5 years never readily disclosed is that the core ideology of this community of researchers was fundamentally divided"
3⃣ Lab based creation of super-viruses

"About half of the researchers, including many leading virologists whose names appeared in the news, believed and argued passionately for the lab-based creation of super-viruses and super-bacteria"
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(