1/ Thread: $FB 3Q'22 Earnings Update

When Evan Spiegel was busy cajoling Apple during the disruptive iOS changes, Zuck understood the gravity and prepared FB quite well ahead of the changes.

But the battle seems to change every quarter. Now it's capital allocation.
2/ 3Q'21 topline grew 33.2% but since spending ramped up, incremental operating margin fell a lot.

As you will see in this thread, it may take quite some time before we see ~60-70% incremental operating margin from FB.
3/ DAU and MAU both +6% YoY

Revenue by geography YoY
North America +35%
Europe +31%
APAC +28%
RoW +50%

# of Ad impressions and price/impression in '21
Q1: +12%/ +30%
Q2: +6% / +47%
Q3: +9% / +22%
4/ Zuck started with the nuances of the challenges FB faces. Don't think his critics are afraid of coming across as prejudiced.

$FB invested $5 Bn in security so far in 2021.

"I believe that's more than any other tech company even adjusted for scale."
5/ Three priorities

I. Creators
II. Commerce
III. Next Computing Platform

"Reels will be as important for our product as Stories is. We expect to make significant changes to IG and FB next yr to further lean into video and make Reels a more central part of the experience"
6/ 18-29 yr old is now core focus for FB

"we are retooling our teams to make serving young adults their North Star rather than optimizing for the larger number of older people."
7/ Commerce is a multi-year journey. Plan is to work with a few biz that are doing well on FB, learn from their experiences, and then scale the solutions broadly next year.
8/ "We're building multiple generations of our VR and AR products at the same time as well as a new operating system, a development model, a digital commerce platform, content studio and, of course, a social platform."
9/ From next quarter, FB will segment Facebook Reality Labs (FRL) separately and expects it to eat away $10 Bn operating profit!!

FB is swinging at AR/VR pretty hard, will share in a bit how I think about it.
10/ iOS changes were indeed a headwind. Although FB didn't quantify, they mentioned without the changes, FB would see sequential, instead of flat, revenue growth.

It sounds more work is required, but doable over LT.
11/ FB enhanced its buyback significantly this quarter and announced $50 Bn buyback authorization. Cash on balance sheet now is $58.1 Bn.

I believe Zuck will use buyback as his machete if shareholders don't agree with his metaverse ambition.
12/ Outlook: 4Q'21 guidance $31.5-34 Bn (+16-25% YoY)

CY'21 expense narrowed to $70-71 Bn. But the real news is CY'22 expense guide is $91-97 Bn. 👀

Important to remember FB has a history of providing very aggressive expense guide which later is tampered down.
13/ Even capex guide for CY'22 is $29-34 Bn (+70% YoY at mid-point)

Some explanations here. Seems the increase in capex to enhance the core product experience whereas opex increase is due to FB's metaverse ambition.
14/ As I mentioned last q, FB doesn't have the shareholder base for speculative bets which is why the capital allocation concerns have been raised.

I expect this tension to grow in future, especially since Zuck seems to be focused on the decade whereas investors are on NTM P/E.
15/ My opinion is it is simply too early to have a dogmatic opinion on Zuck's AR/VR ambition in either direction. I have decided to educate myself on the topic for the next few quarters.

I actually registered for this after the earnings call 😂

facebookconnect.com/en-us/communit…
16/ Buying FB is betting on the intersection of media, communication, and tech. It's extremely dynamic and missing a big pivot will be VERY expensive.

Zuck seems to have conviction on AR/VR. We don't have to necessarily believe it now, but I most certainly won't laugh at it.
End/ I will cover $GOOG and $AMZN this week.

All my twitter threads here: mbi-deepdives.com/twitter-thread…
Edit: It's 3Q'21 Earnings Update. Unfortunately, I'm not living in the future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mostly Borrowed Ideas

Mostly Borrowed Ideas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @borrowed_ideas

27 Oct
1/ Thread: $GOOG 3Q'21 Earnings Update

Google continues to post numbers that would probably break analysts' DCFs.

What really boggles my mind is YouTube, a ~$29 Bn run-rate biz, is growing at ~40% 2-yr CAGR whereas $NFLX, a comparable topline company growing at ~22% 2-yr CAGR. Image
2/ Unlike FB, GOOG's incremental operating margin remains >50%.

Cloud's operating margin remains similar to last quarter, but clearly easier to imagine today profitability reaching sooner than what I thought after looking at negative 35-45% margin last year. Image
3/ "We recently surpassed 50 million music and premium subscribers, including those in trial, and YouTube shots continues to see higher adoption rates. In the past year, the average number of daily first-time creators more than doubled"
Read 10 tweets
20 Oct
1/9 I have noticed a counterintuitive benefit from sharing my portfolio publicly. This isn't call for you to share your portfolio publicly; I'm aware it is not feasible/rational for many out there.

I'm just explaining how I think it helps *me*.
2/9 Before talking about the benefit, let me briefly mention the potential negative.

Well, the negative is probably obvious. Sharing my portfolio publicly may create a commitment bias. It's hard to change your mind once you propagate all the bullish pov on stocks you own.
3/9 There is truth to that, especially since I say I intend to be long-term investor.

It would create a cognitive dissonance if I get in and out of stocks every few months and yet claim myself long-term oriented simultaneously. So I kinda have to remain invested unless...
Read 9 tweets
14 Oct
1/8 Thread: Installation vs Deployment era investors

Ben Thompson recently wrote about Carlota Perez's theory related to "Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital".

Some thoughts on this topic.
2/8 As I kept reading and thinking on this, it occurred to me that the defining debate in investing for the next couple of decades may not be "value" vs "growth" investing rather "installation" vs "deployment" investing.
3/8 Perez identifies five distinct era for tech revolutions:

The industrial revolution
Age of Steam and Railways
Age of Steel, electricity, and heavy engineering
Age of Oil, automobiles, and mass production
Age of information and telecommunications
Read 8 tweets
9 Oct
1/ Final thread on $ETSY

Lots of thoughtful and gracious feedback (both in support and against) on my decision to sell Etsy. I’ll recap some of these discussions and share my thoughts in this thread.

For the uninitiated, here’s the original post: mbi-deepdives.com/etsy/
2/ Pushback #1: You should look at GMS/active seller instead of GMS/active buyer

If you followed my original work, that’s exactly how I modeled my GMS in future years. Now I believe that’s an inferior approach.
3/ Most marketplace literature comes from VCs who rightly focus on both sellers and buyers in a two-sided marketplace as it faces an acute chicken and egg problem. Since VCs take the marketplace from embryo to a toddler stage, BOTH buyers and sellers are of paramount importance.
Read 20 tweets
6 Oct
1/9 Thread: quick thoughts on @benthompson's piece on "Facebook Political Problems"

Fascinating and intriguing read. Perhaps one of the very few analysts who wrestle and ponder on the many parallel pros and cons of Facebook and its centralized power.
stratechery.com/2021/facebook-…
2/ Analysts who pretend otherwise are probably either not paying attention or being intellectually disingenuous.

The article reminded me of one of earlier realizations before buying $FB.
3/ All social media companies at scale are eventually going to be state propaganda machines unless the judiciary and the legislative branch are independent. In such a scenario, value may mostly accrue to the state, not the shareholders.
Read 9 tweets
5 Oct
1/ Thread: Facebook's follies

I am an $FB shareholder, and intend to remain so despite the constant negative press coverage.

I'm not oblivious to FB's follies, but disagree with the motivated inferences of the detractors. I do, however, have sympathy for some concerns.
2/ I admit any social media has incentive structure that makes it difficult for the company not to optimize for engagement.

If everyone logs into FB for just a minute/day to get the relevant stuff they want and logs off promptly, an ad-based model cannot work in such a case.
3/ A subscription based model could work for such a "social media".

Of course, any subscription product comes at the expense of lack of access which was non-starter for Zuck from Day 1.

It's instructive to read the very first sentence Zuck wrote in his letter on FB's S-1:
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(