The Cosmic Tusk blog is promoting a new article by Tankersley et al., "The Hopewell airburst event, 1699-1567 years ago (252-383 CE)" that claims "a cosmic airburst event occurred over the Ohio River valley during the late Holocene." @MarkBoslough? cosmictusk.com/hopewell-comet…
The abstract of the article notes: "A comet-shaped earthwork was constructed near the airburst epicenter... While Hopewell people survived the catastrophic event, it likely contributed to their cultural decline."
Other important stuff was happening in the Americas around that time. I wonder what else will be pinned on comets. The Teotihuacan entrada? The Lord of Sipán?
Oops, my bad. It's a preprint.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A really cool paper was published yesterday in Nature Human Behaviour:
Origins and spread of formal ceremonial complexes in the Olmec and Maya regions revealed by airborne lidar. It reports on 478 sites with rectangular complexes like one at San Lorenzo. nature.com/articles/s4156…
Origins and spread of formal ceremonial complexes in the Olmec and Maya regions revealed by airborne lidar nature.com/articles/s4156…
Since folks have been watching “The Dig,” about the Sutton Hoo Anglo-Saxon shop burial whose remarkable treasures you can learn about by following @NT_SuttonHoo, this morning I’ll be tweeting about what was going on in eastern Costa Rica around the same time (ca. 400-700 CE). 1/
The preceding period in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica, about 300 BCE to 400 CE, is known as El Bosque. This terminology was first used by the late archaeologist Michael Snarskis, who referred to the period from about 400 to 700 CE as La Selva.
These arbitrary names are used by archaeologists to describe periods of time for which we can recognize patterns in material culture. However, the boundaries of these are not clearly defined. For example, the transition from El Bosque to La Selva has long been a matter of debate.
Twitter is a completely appropriate forum for questions, feedback, criticism, and ongoing discussion of #pseudoarchaeology and its implications for the advancement of knowledge.
Read the essays and let us know what you think!
Part of my impetus for addressing this topic was the fact that I kept meeting professional archaeologists who professed to have never even heard of Graham Hancock.
I apologize to all of you who would have been better off never knowing about him and his books.