Trust can't be restored within the framework of the regime. It can't allow itself to be reformed, because pulling up any plank of the system undermines nearly every other part of it as well. Reform, for it, is collapse
So its survival requires enforcing complete submission to it
Complete submission is by no means guaranteed, they actually have very little will to use force (so far), and use of force tends to be a failure-mode within democracy, hence "nudges," "policies," and anarcho-tyranny, all forms of hand-washing away responsibility
But as for restoring trust, that simply can't happen within this framework. Coercion is their only remaining option. Engineering and enforcing the fake appearance of trust, to match the rest of the fake and gay regime
Trust can only be restored by outsiders, who will never be *allowed* real influence within the fully captured institutions.
Trust is only possible after the regime ends. The good news is, that in rejecting reform, the regime risks suicide instead.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
lmao. This is why @Tinkzorg is one of my most favorite recent follows
It's no coincidence that Jurassic Park as explained here "got it," because Michael Crichton "got it," that's how Crichton coined the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect, the original "fake news"
One of the simplest ways of understanding American politics, and by extension all Western politics, is that you have a once-stable political system (post-WW2 order) increasingly pushed toward a chaotic instability
Hence Brexit, Trump, Italy, Hungary, even Bolsonaro, etc
The ruling order—described in this piece as the guy automating the electric fences to keep the dinosaurs out—is increasingly unable to sustain those once-electric fences
It won't allow a "Trump" etc to repair them, either. That's why I think we're inevitably headed towards chaos
This is the Big Fat Skeleton Key to understanding nearly everything around us. This culture's basic ideological framework is that everything that exists is a result of nurture and environment (including "socio-economic status")
This is shocking and upsetting in many ways, because a culture that promises everything is the result of nurture means that you can always wildly improve your lot in life—and especially your children's—by adhering to the scientifically-approved nurture, environment, and policies
But the fact is we're all limited, in many ways, and to an immense variance between us all, from the moment we are conceived
Yet I find this immensely liberating, in the *real* sense of the word. For it relieves everyone of being in constant competition with everyone, for life
"Why have our discussions about class shifted away from money?", asks the genius, whose political party has become the party of the wealthy and whose propaganda media organ sets the national political narrative
Imagine believing that the car dealership owner in Wherever Ohio with a net worth of $4M has any real political power in comparison to the entire academic-media class whose ideology has also conquered Google Facebook etc
This is the precise position of a huge amount of them, which is why they are nonetheless "elites" despite not having much money, in that they have real political power that they wield to further advance the interests of the "true" elites they wish to join
The Cathedral looking as strong as it's ever been in some ways while also being on absolute fucking life support is just beyond all reckoning. No one can predict where this is going at this point
On the one hand: almost total institutional capture. On the other hand: it can't even answer the questions of its own pet media anymore
And this phenomenon isn't just about the presidency, it's about every realm of it
Science is increasingly shutting down all internal questions that might contradict it; higher education the same (while also panickedly treating its students like convicts until a broken Science finally solves the plague); even the military purging itself for purity over function
Civil War discourse is very simple: if you can't honestly explain the South's perspective for deciding to do something as extreme as (mostly peaceful) secession, then you don't understand the Civil War, at all.
And yes, you may absolutely include slavery. That's a no-brainer.
We all know the North's perspective (although not really lol, but let's just pretend). But if you can't explain the South's perspective, then you don't actually understand the Civil War.
To understand the Civil War, you must be able to explain *both sides*
Wish I could remember the exact book that flipped my perspective on this. But it was just a normie book, not even "based," everyone loved it, even scholars. 700-page tome
It just laid out very plainly the political conditions on both sides that convinced the South to secede.
And by contrast to the vax, I have no objection to seatbelts, as far as I know there are no real tradeoffs (please tell me there isn't a seatbelt-pill)
But that only makes the insistence on seatbelt laws stranger: custom should have accomplished the same as laws, very fast.
Delegating these decisions to insta-law by the Law-Givers, instead of leaving it to the people to organically adopt as custom, which then becomes tradition, suggests to me an imposition of values from a Managerial Class onto a Managed Class.