THREAD. See our investigations into how the UK legal process has been conflicted from the start of the US attempt to prosecute Julian #Assange
The case has implications for media freedom and the US right to prosecute anyone in the world, but also for the independence of UK law
The husband of Lady Arbuthnot, Westminster chief magistrate who initially oversaw #Assange’s extradition case to the US, was shown to have financial links to the British military establishment, including institutions exposed by WikiLeaks.
Lady Arbuthnot had even received financial benefits from two partner organisations of the Foreign Office before her appointment - yet she failed to formally declare conflicts of interests in presiding over the #Assange case.
Incredibly, the son of Lady Arbuthnot was shown to be linked to an anti-data leak company created by the UK intelligence establishment and staffed by officials recruited from US intelligence agencies behind that country’s prosecution of Julian #Assange.
As Lady Arbuthnot ruled against #Assange in 2018, refusing to release him from what the UN termed 'arbitrary detention', her husband, a former defence minister, was closely associated with a lobby group publicly criticising the WikiLeaks founder.
When Vanessa Baraitser took over the #Assange case, we discovered she had a 96% extradition record. The Ministry of Justice blocked the release of basic information about her in what appears to be an irregular application of the FOI Act
Then David Davis told us that judge Baraitser "got the law wrong" by claiming in her ruling in January this year that the UK/US extradition the treaty included political crimes, which it doesn't, in his analysis.
"There was overwhelming enthusiasm in the British media for the invasion of Iraq. In Afghanistan, it was only after mounting evidence emerged of fatalities that the media began to be critical", writes Richard @NortonTaylor, Guardian defence correspondent for 40 yrs
"The MoD knows how to seduce journalists, by showing off new weapons. This is something defence ministers and officials hope will also keep the military onside and stop them leaking about how bad their equipment is."
The British government welcomed the 2019 coup in Bolivia that overthrew democratically-elected president Evo Morales. It then strongly supported the resulting coup regime. Here's why. Thread.
On 19 December 2019 - the month after Morales fled the country - Britain’s Foreign Office appears to have paid Oxford-based company, Satellite Applications Catapult, £33,220 to optimise "exploitation" of Bolivia’s huge lithium deposits.
In March 2020, five months after democracy was overthrown, the UK embassy acted as a "strategic partner" to the coup regime, and organised an international mining event in Bolivia.
Said @BenJamalpsc of @PSCupdates: “This failure by the government to answer questions about arms exports to Israel is shamefully consistent with its systematic disregard of its own regulatory guidelines regarding arms exports". bit.ly/3w0S30w
Watch our video of a Nigerian helicopter attack on villagers and its aftermath - months after Declassified revealed Nigerian air force pilots were secretly training in the UK. bit.ly/3hmQPZH
Eyewitnesses blame the Nigerian air strikes on a helicopter gunship made by Leonardo, an Italian firm supplying Nigeria with combat aircraft.
The company has close links to the UK government. bit.ly/3hmQPZH
Nazanin’s story in Iran is not just a tragedy, it’s a warning
Richard Ratcliffe
As Iran sentences Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe to a further 2 years in Iran, her husband outlines why Britain’s secretive, unaccountable arms trade is a danger to UK citizens
"The money withheld by the British government is the reason Nazanin has been detained in Iran since her arrest in 2016 while on a family holiday with our then 22-month old daughter, Gabriella", writes Richard Ratcliffe.