I know a fair amount about New York State law for hiring and firing clergy. I know a fair amount about shul politics. This is not a thread about those. So about the rebbetzin-ate, and what it is to inhabit and lose that role, and my heart goes out to @avitalrachel, a thread:
(I get to decide what this thread is for, and what it is isn't. Will viciously block anyone who brings any ugly into this thread. Not interested; not having it. You don't like it, start your own.)
I've spoken--publicly, in my shul, in my then-role as a rebbetzin--about how strange the role is. A job you get with no training or preparation, by virtue of your ketubah. (2/n)
And while some rabbis' wives have renounced the role, and some shuls have come to see that expecting unpaid labor from rabbis' wives is archaic (at best), in a lot of places, it is still what is. Even if the rabbi's wife in question has a whole other professional life. (3/n)
(Also, too, if you're saying "But the shul pays for their housing/tuition/household help/etc.", welcome to rabbinic contracts in the 21st century, certainly in many places. My shul paid for none of those for my family. I rebbetzined anyway.) (4/n)
Please do not misunderstand. I loved and love my shul community; I am no longer a rebbetzin but am still a regular mitpallelet and now dues-paying-member. I actually enjoyed the role. I'm just sharing the reality. (5/n)
So, without salary or training, and despite other responsibilities, you do the work. The hosting. The teaching. The listening and guiding (and referring for counseling, when it's way above your pay grade.) (6/n)
The inevitable political navigating. (7/n)
But it's not your job. Not your contract. And that means that you can lose a role and a community that you invested in, not just with no control over what happens (the rabbi may not have much of that, either), but just as collateral damage. (8/n)
There is real pain and loss in that, and no place to put it. You didn't lose a job--you never had one. But you may have lost a home (spiritual and physical) and a community. And you certainly lost a role and place that you'd been working to fill for years. (9/n)
When there is speculation about (or hard evidence of) rabbinic misconduct, the rebbetzin absorbs some of the blame, whether or not she made the choices or knew about them. I spoke at length to a woman in this position. I can't even imagine. (10/n)
I could be making a political point here (if we hired and paid women for clergy/clergy-adjacent work, this could at least somewhat more transparent, intentional, and maybe even fair and respectful [although obviously, rabbis, too, are not always treated fairly and respectfully.])
But I'm not, right now. I'm just sharing what it feels like to invest a decade of your life in a role you weren't trained or hired for, but married into, tried to fill as well as you could, and then lost for reasons entirely beyond your control. (12/n)
I was very fortunate in that in losing my rebbetzinate I did not lose my shul community. Some former rebbetzins, given their circumstances, do. I have other jobs and roles. I have more than enough other upheaval in my life to keep me occupied. (13/n)
But in reading this story, that's what sits with me. Not the shul politics, the speculations about who-did-what-right-or-wrong, the violations of New York State law. The putting a decade of your life into a role, when you certainly had other things to put it into. (14/n)
And then losing it.
Not on the basis of choices you made, or actions you took.
Because the role may have demanding, and time-consuming--but it was never yours to begin with.
The loss, though. The loss is yours. And in the noise, the loss is what I'm thinking about. (15/15.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am utterly blown away by this appearing in Cross Currents. (You can read it and tell me all the ways it falls short, or you can read it and realize what an enormous sea change is reflected in this discussion, of these issues, this way, for this audience. I prefer the latter.)
(For those not familiar, Cross Currents is a publication of and for the intellectual/open haredi world. If you go back and look at R' Shmuel Kaminetzky (with Arthur Goldberg!) in Hakira on "same-sex attraction" a decade ago and then this, it's light-years. Parsecs.)
I cannot give a big enough yasher koach to Rabbi @YisraelMotzen for stepping up and saying these things, in this community, about LGBTQ members of our community and their families. There is neck-sticking-out here, and there will be backlash. Thank you for braving it.
Well, here's a conundrum. I declined to participate in this the first time I was asked. I changed my mind after a change on the masthead. And now find myself alongside a denunciation of "the subtle takeover of our generation's mind by progressive ideas...." (And @DBashIdeas. 😄)
I don't feel quite as compromised by who-else-is-commentating (which I didn't know until I saw it in print) as I would appearing in a publication whose editor had been inside the Capitol on January 6th. But perhaps that's post-hoc motivated reasoning.
Another version, @DBashIdeas, of the complicated calculuses (calculi?) of which ideas we use and share, and which songs we sing, and whom we'll appear with. Interested in hearing thoughts. (And of course, he may be as dismayed to be alongside me and my @SHI_America affiliation.)
Following up on @DBashIdeas, the Jewish Action issue, and @themishpacha supplement that I haven't read yet, I want to say one thing about cost-of-frum-life discussions: enormously underrated in this conversation is the choice of where to live--*not* in the cost-of-living sense.
In the setting your barometer of what's normal, acceptable, adequate, and setting your kids' barometer of what's normal, acceptable, adequate.
I think people consider a lot of factors when they choose a community in which to live and raise a family, and "how will this set our family's materialism-barometer" is not necessarily one of them.
As someone who lived through the awful days of March and April of 2020 in New York City, I cannot believe that a political movement made an active choice to replicate what we suffered through.
My son is an EMT. At one point, they received orders that if a cardiac arrest patient couldn't be resuscitated outside the hospital, they should be pronounced dead and not brought to the hospital for further treatment--resources couldn't be spared.
FOX hosts and GOP electeds chose this for their listeners and constituents.
אֶת־חֲטָאַ֕י אֲנִ֖י מַזְכִּ֥יר הַיּֽוֹם
I was once Mr. Logic Man. Everything was a debating society point; if I could argue my way around you I was right and you were wrong. (And I could usually argue my way around you.)
Not only were lived experience and feelings irrelevant, introducing them into the conversation proved the weakness of an argument that could not stand up to the rigors of reasoned debate.
(If this sounds like a whole lot of frum internalized misogyny, you are absolutely right.)
I remember in college at some point getting into a vigorous argument with someone about how disabled people would be best served by robust Access-A-Ride programs that would give them rides places, rather than retrofitting public transit stations. Cost/benefit analysis, you see.