2. This is yet another example of COVID-19 as accelerator (not disruptor).
3. The CBD was evolving in this direction before the pandemic.
4. The CBD was spreading. In many cities, additional CBDs were cropping up in other locations. And not just in cities. Edge cities like Tysons Corner outside DC. Poly-centrism has been on the rise, esp in younger SunBelt cities ...
5. And urban CBDs were adding much more amenity and housing as many urbanists and downtown types have pointed out.
6. We have also seen the rise of Central Social Districts & Central Recreational Districts ... in, around or adjacent to CBDs.
7. The big trend here is to decentralization or disaggregation or spreading of work. Co-working is also part of this.
8. One of the big impactr of the industrial revolution was the separation of the home and work into separate spaces. And those spaces were stretched further & further apart on mass production of Fordist capitalism
9. The shift to remote work - one of the biggest trends in the organization of work - accelerated by the pandemic allows for some reunification of the spaces for home & work, albeit *just* for very advantaged workers.
10. This ongoing "reunification" of living and working is a key feature of the evolution of advanced capitalism, at least for the knowledge workers who make up a new kind of labor aristocracy.
11. This shift also frees up key locational spaces, often at the very center of the metropolitan area for HOUSING, which given the housing affordability crisis faced by most advanced nations, is much more needed than locations for office work.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. "Traditional theories of cities emphasize production decisions and the costs of workers commuting between their workplace and residence."
3. "However, much of the travel that occurs within urban areas is related not to commuting but rather to the consumption of nontraded services, such as trips to restaurants, coffee shops and bars, shopping centers,
cultural venues, and other services."
1. A quick thread on the new book Survival of the City by Ed Glaeser & David Cutler. Just finished it this afternoon. It's terrific. A must, must read. There is a lot to the book, so I'll focus on what it has to say for cities and urbanization.
2. First off, it's an extremely well-crafted book - a GREAT READ.
3. For me the highlight of the book are the chapters which trace the history of pandemics & plagues & their impacts on cities and urbanization. It's clear Glaeser loves this material and that he has a penchant for economic history and it shines as a high point of the book.
1. Interested in the future of downtowns & central business districts. Let's take a little time machine back to 1958 and see what Jane Jacobs had to say on the subject in her seminal essay, "Downtown Is for People." innovationecosystem.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/6…
2. "We are accustomed to thinking of downtowns as divided into functional districts – financial, shopping, theatre – and so they are, but only to a degree."
3. "As soon as an area gets too exclusively devoted to one
type of activity and its direct convenience services,
it gets into trouble; it loses its appeal to the users
of downtown and it is in danger of becoming a
has-been."
2. Our basic position: "People are free to make all the bad choices they want when it comes to themselves, but not when they put others in danger and incur costs that we all must pay. "
3. Especially with the uber-contagious Delta variant, the unvaccinated pose direct risks to the health and well-being of the immunocompromised, the frail and the elderly, and especially young kids.
2. Our paper examines the role of 2 kinds of factors in the geography of COVID-19 in Sweden.
3. Place-based factors like density, socio-economic disparity, age levels, versus diffusion factors like proximity to harder hit areas which would be associated with the spread of COVID.