2nd paper 📰📰 Vaccine Cohort 💉 We analysed vaccine responses in 585 patients with cancer after COVID-19 vaccination, measuring neutralising responses against the original SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern (incl. Delta) and T cell responses (1/11)
After two doses of either Pfizer-BionTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca, 83% of infection-naïve patients with cancer developed antibodies against the original strain, but only 54% of those had neutralising antibodies against Delta (2/11)
Importantly, we show that while the proportion of patients with S1-reactive antibodies is concordant to patients with NAb against WT SARS-CoV-2 it can overestimate neutralising responses against variants of concern (3/11)
Patients with blood cancer were less likely to have neutralising antibodies against Delta than patients with solid cancer (31% blood cancer, 62% solid cancer). Apart from anti-CD20, cancer therapies did not negatively impact neutralising responses (4/11)
Following 2 vaccine doses, patients previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 had higher neutralising responses against Delta than those without previous infection. This lends support for boosters in patients with cancer, especially patients with blood cancers (5/11)
Patient age and vaccine type associated with neutralising responses independent of cancer type, suggesting that patient age and prior vaccine type can also guide prioritisation for booster doses (6/11)
79% of cancer patients had detectable T cell responses independent of cancer type incl. patients without NAb. T cells may offer a level of protection, in keeping with our finding that patients with blood cancer recovered from COVID-19, in the absence of NAb (7/11)
Our data highlight that patients with cancer, but ESPECIALLY blood cancers, should be prioritised for booster doses 💉🚨 Variants of concern, especially in times of high community transmission, pose an increased risk for patients with cancer (8/11)
Our data suggest that patients with cancer, but esp. blood cancer should continue to take precautions in high-risk situations. Simple public health measures, such as mask mandates on public transport & indoor spaces may help protect all vulnerable groups, and their carers (9/11)
Summary ✅Most cancer patients have functional immune responses to vaccine/after infection but some with blood cancer may not ✅3rd doses likely to be beneficial even against Delta ✅High community transmissions will impact the more vulnerable 😷😷😷(10/11)
Going forward, we are looking at breakthrough infections 🌡️and functional immune responses to 3rd dose vaccines 💉💉💉 & established the #InternationalCancerCOVID19Vaccine #ICCV consortium @VriesElisabeth @HaanenJohn @myESMO @ASCO @ASCOpost (11/11)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Turajlic Lab @ The Crick

Turajlic Lab @ The Crick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TurajlicLab

28 Oct
📰Out NOW in @cancercell ‼️👉cell.com/cancer-cell/fu… 🎉What underpins anti-PD-1 response in ccRCC?

Results from ADAPTeR Phase II clinical trial, bulk/single-cell analysis of longitudinal tumour samples ⤵️(1/15) @royalmarsdenNHS @TheCrick @uclcancer Image
Intratumour heterogeneity (ITH) is pervasive in ccRCC & longitudinal data on anti-PD1 response is scarce 🚨 Thus we performed multi-omics analysis on 115 multiregion tumour samples, taken at baseline, week-9, & PD, from 15 treatment-naïve patients treated with nivo 🔬 (2/15) Image
What are the determinants of anti-PD1 response? 🤔 In keeping with other studies, no nsSNV/fsINDEL/copy number event, nor TMB/wGII (measure of chromosomal complexity) correlated with response, pre or post-nivo, even accounting for ITH (3/15) Image
Read 15 tweets
27 Oct
1st paper📰 Infection Cohort 👉We analysed neutralising and T cell responses in 118 patients with cancer, where SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined by positive PCR or antibody test. COVID-19 severity ranged from asymptomatic to severe (1/6) nature.com/articles/s4301…
Most patient with solid cancer had neutralising antibodies while blood cancer patients had reduced or absent neutralising responses (2/6)
Patients who were infected with either the original strain or the Alpha variant had neutralising responses that were reduced against the Beta and Delta variants (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
27 Oct
Two papers OUT NOW in @NatureCancer ‼️ What does the immune response in cancer patients look like after COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection? We present results from the #CAPTURE study. Two-part thread (vaccine & infection cohort findings) to follow... 🧵🧵 (1/4) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43018-021-00274-whttps://www.nature.com/articles/s43018-021-00275-9
About the study: #CAPTURE a prospective, longitudinal cohort study established in April 2020 and conducted at @royalmarsdenNHS and @TheCrick. #CAPTUREstudy recruitment and analyses are ongoing (2/4) cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
CAPTURE assessed functional immunity in cancer patients – given registry studies @COVID19nCCC @UKCORONACANCER show cancer patients are vulnerable to COVID19 & vaccines induce robust adaptive immunity but may be lower in blood cancer patients @EJohnWherry @florian_krammer (3/4)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(